Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans
Background: Treatment plans for head and neck (H&N) cancer are highly complex due to multiple dose prescription levels and numerous organs at risk (OARs) close to the target. The plan quality is inter-planner dependent since it is dependent on the skills and experience of the dosimetrist. This s...
Main Authors: | Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders Bertelsen, Irene Hazell, Ruta Zukauskaite, Niels Gyldenkerne, Jørgen Johansen, Jesper G. Eriksen, Carsten Brink |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630816300040 |
Similar Items
-
Co-registration of radiotherapy planning and recurrence scans with different imaging modalities in head and neck cancer
by: Morten Horsholt Kristensen, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
RapidPlan head and neck model: the objectives and possible clinical benefit
by: A. Fogliata, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Delineation uncertainties of tumour volumes on MRI of head and neck cancer patients
by: Ruta Zukauskaite, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Radiotherapy of prostate and head-and-neck tumour: an optimal treatment planning comparison for intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arctherapy techniques
by: Ghulam Murtaza
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Comparison of Different Dosimetric Indices for Volumetric Arc Modulated Treatment Planning Using 2 Different Treatment Planning Systems: A Feasibility Study for Total Body Irradiation
by: Reena Kumari, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01)