Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array Selection

Background: Radiological high-resolution computed tomography-based evaluation of cochlear implant candidates’ cochlear duct length (CDL) has become the method of choice for electrode array selection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if MRI-based data match CT-based data and if this impac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan Peter Thomas, Hannah Klein, Imme Haubitz, Stefan Dazert, Christiane Völter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/4/633
_version_ 1797604736524877824
author Jan Peter Thomas
Hannah Klein
Imme Haubitz
Stefan Dazert
Christiane Völter
author_facet Jan Peter Thomas
Hannah Klein
Imme Haubitz
Stefan Dazert
Christiane Völter
author_sort Jan Peter Thomas
collection DOAJ
description Background: Radiological high-resolution computed tomography-based evaluation of cochlear implant candidates’ cochlear duct length (CDL) has become the method of choice for electrode array selection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if MRI-based data match CT-based data and if this impacts on electrode array choice. Methods: Participants were 39 children. CDL, length at two turns, diameters, and height of the cochlea were determined via CT and MRI by three raters using tablet-based otosurgical planning software. Personalized electrode array length, angular insertion depth (AID), intra- and interrater differences, and reliability were calculated. Results: Mean intrarater difference of CT- versus MRI-based CDL was 0.528 ± 0.483 mm without significant differences. Individual length at two turns differed between 28.0 mm and 36.6 mm. Intrarater reliability between CT versus MRI measurements was high (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.929–0.938). Selection of the optimal electrode array based on CT and MRI matched in 90.1% of cases. Mean AID was 629.5° based on the CT and 634.6° based on the MRI; this is not a significant difference. ICC of the mean interrater reliability was 0.887 for the CT-based evaluation and 0.82 for the MRI-based evaluation. Conclusion: MRI-based CDL measurement shows a low intrarater difference and a high interrater reliability and is therefore suitable for personalized electrode array selection.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:50:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d8c71a1c1694aafa49a2ca5d5abe989
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4426
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:50:59Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
spelling doaj.art-5d8c71a1c1694aafa49a2ca5d5abe9892023-11-17T19:59:55ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262023-04-0113463310.3390/jpm13040633Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array SelectionJan Peter Thomas0Hannah Klein1Imme Haubitz2Stefan Dazert3Christiane Völter4Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Johannes Hospital, Cath. St. Paulus Society, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Münster, Johannesstr. 9-17, 44137 Dortmund, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, GermanyBackground: Radiological high-resolution computed tomography-based evaluation of cochlear implant candidates’ cochlear duct length (CDL) has become the method of choice for electrode array selection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if MRI-based data match CT-based data and if this impacts on electrode array choice. Methods: Participants were 39 children. CDL, length at two turns, diameters, and height of the cochlea were determined via CT and MRI by three raters using tablet-based otosurgical planning software. Personalized electrode array length, angular insertion depth (AID), intra- and interrater differences, and reliability were calculated. Results: Mean intrarater difference of CT- versus MRI-based CDL was 0.528 ± 0.483 mm without significant differences. Individual length at two turns differed between 28.0 mm and 36.6 mm. Intrarater reliability between CT versus MRI measurements was high (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.929–0.938). Selection of the optimal electrode array based on CT and MRI matched in 90.1% of cases. Mean AID was 629.5° based on the CT and 634.6° based on the MRI; this is not a significant difference. ICC of the mean interrater reliability was 0.887 for the CT-based evaluation and 0.82 for the MRI-based evaluation. Conclusion: MRI-based CDL measurement shows a low intrarater difference and a high interrater reliability and is therefore suitable for personalized electrode array selection.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/4/633cochlear implantlateral wall electrode arraycochlear duct lengthradiological measurementCTMRI
spellingShingle Jan Peter Thomas
Hannah Klein
Imme Haubitz
Stefan Dazert
Christiane Völter
Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array Selection
Journal of Personalized Medicine
cochlear implant
lateral wall electrode array
cochlear duct length
radiological measurement
CT
MRI
title Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array Selection
title_full Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array Selection
title_fullStr Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array Selection
title_full_unstemmed Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array Selection
title_short Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array Selection
title_sort intra and interrater reliability of ct versus mri based cochlear duct length measurement in pediatric cochlear implant candidates and its impact on personalized electrode array selection
topic cochlear implant
lateral wall electrode array
cochlear duct length
radiological measurement
CT
MRI
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/4/633
work_keys_str_mv AT janpeterthomas intraandinterraterreliabilityofctversusmribasedcochlearductlengthmeasurementinpediatriccochlearimplantcandidatesanditsimpactonpersonalizedelectrodearrayselection
AT hannahklein intraandinterraterreliabilityofctversusmribasedcochlearductlengthmeasurementinpediatriccochlearimplantcandidatesanditsimpactonpersonalizedelectrodearrayselection
AT immehaubitz intraandinterraterreliabilityofctversusmribasedcochlearductlengthmeasurementinpediatriccochlearimplantcandidatesanditsimpactonpersonalizedelectrodearrayselection
AT stefandazert intraandinterraterreliabilityofctversusmribasedcochlearductlengthmeasurementinpediatriccochlearimplantcandidatesanditsimpactonpersonalizedelectrodearrayselection
AT christianevolter intraandinterraterreliabilityofctversusmribasedcochlearductlengthmeasurementinpediatriccochlearimplantcandidatesanditsimpactonpersonalizedelectrodearrayselection