Effectiveness of Three Types of Moisturizers on Senile Dry Skin: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Background. For dry skin, the application of a hypoallergenic moisturizer twice daily is recommended in elderly individuals. However, it is not known which is the most effective and appropriate moisturizer among the commercially available moisturizers. Aims. In this study, we aimed to investigate th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miku Aoki, Natsuki Hata, Junko Yotsuya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2023-01-01
Series:Dermatology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/1809109
_version_ 1797770886537805824
author Miku Aoki
Natsuki Hata
Junko Yotsuya
author_facet Miku Aoki
Natsuki Hata
Junko Yotsuya
author_sort Miku Aoki
collection DOAJ
description Background. For dry skin, the application of a hypoallergenic moisturizer twice daily is recommended in elderly individuals. However, it is not known which is the most effective and appropriate moisturizer among the commercially available moisturizers. Aims. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of the three widely used moisturizers for the treatment of senile dry skin. Patients/Methods. This interventional study involved elderly individuals aged >65 years who were living in a nursing home. The participants were randomly divided into the interventional (moisturizers A, B, and C) and conventional care groups. Moisturizers A, B, and C were applied on the skin of each member of the three intervention groups twice daily for 8 weeks. The water content of the stratum corneum and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were evaluated before and after the intervention. Changes in these parameters among the groups were compared using two-way analysis of variance and a posthoc test. Results. Moisturizers A, B, and C and conventional care groups comprised six, seven, five, and four participants, respectively. The water content of the stratum corneum was significantly higher in the moisturizer A p=0.01 and B p=0.047 groups than in the conventional care group. There was no significant difference in TEWL among the groups. Conclusions. In terms of the appearance of the skin, white powder and small scales were both reduced in group A. Taken together with the water content, this was considered a clinically significant change.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:29:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5dabf6a54d3c4e39a8e39ab5c9c95468
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1687-6113
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:29:32Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Hindawi Limited
record_format Article
series Dermatology Research and Practice
spelling doaj.art-5dabf6a54d3c4e39a8e39ab5c9c954682023-07-28T00:00:03ZengHindawi LimitedDermatology Research and Practice1687-61132023-01-01202310.1155/2023/1809109Effectiveness of Three Types of Moisturizers on Senile Dry Skin: A Randomized Controlled Pilot TrialMiku Aoki0Natsuki Hata1Junko Yotsuya2Division of NursingDepartment of NursingDivision of NursingBackground. For dry skin, the application of a hypoallergenic moisturizer twice daily is recommended in elderly individuals. However, it is not known which is the most effective and appropriate moisturizer among the commercially available moisturizers. Aims. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of the three widely used moisturizers for the treatment of senile dry skin. Patients/Methods. This interventional study involved elderly individuals aged >65 years who were living in a nursing home. The participants were randomly divided into the interventional (moisturizers A, B, and C) and conventional care groups. Moisturizers A, B, and C were applied on the skin of each member of the three intervention groups twice daily for 8 weeks. The water content of the stratum corneum and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were evaluated before and after the intervention. Changes in these parameters among the groups were compared using two-way analysis of variance and a posthoc test. Results. Moisturizers A, B, and C and conventional care groups comprised six, seven, five, and four participants, respectively. The water content of the stratum corneum was significantly higher in the moisturizer A p=0.01 and B p=0.047 groups than in the conventional care group. There was no significant difference in TEWL among the groups. Conclusions. In terms of the appearance of the skin, white powder and small scales were both reduced in group A. Taken together with the water content, this was considered a clinically significant change.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/1809109
spellingShingle Miku Aoki
Natsuki Hata
Junko Yotsuya
Effectiveness of Three Types of Moisturizers on Senile Dry Skin: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
Dermatology Research and Practice
title Effectiveness of Three Types of Moisturizers on Senile Dry Skin: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
title_full Effectiveness of Three Types of Moisturizers on Senile Dry Skin: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Three Types of Moisturizers on Senile Dry Skin: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Three Types of Moisturizers on Senile Dry Skin: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
title_short Effectiveness of Three Types of Moisturizers on Senile Dry Skin: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
title_sort effectiveness of three types of moisturizers on senile dry skin a randomized controlled pilot trial
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/1809109
work_keys_str_mv AT mikuaoki effectivenessofthreetypesofmoisturizersonseniledryskinarandomizedcontrolledpilottrial
AT natsukihata effectivenessofthreetypesofmoisturizersonseniledryskinarandomizedcontrolledpilottrial
AT junkoyotsuya effectivenessofthreetypesofmoisturizersonseniledryskinarandomizedcontrolledpilottrial