THE SOLVENCY II APPROACH ON THE CAPITAL CHARGE FOR THE NON-LIFE CATASTROPHIC RISK

This paper addresses a current issue: the assessment and the establishment of the capital charge for the non-life catastrophic risk (cat risk) in terms of Solvency II Directive. Firstly we’ll present several aspects on the conditions and the defining elements of Solvency II Directive implementation,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ciumas Cristina, Coca Ramona Alexandrina, Oniga Alexandra
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: University of Oradea 2014-07-01
Series:Annals of the University of Oradea: Economic Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2014/n1/096.pdf
_version_ 1811241699335208960
author Ciumas Cristina
Coca Ramona Alexandrina
Oniga Alexandra
author_facet Ciumas Cristina
Coca Ramona Alexandrina
Oniga Alexandra
author_sort Ciumas Cristina
collection DOAJ
description This paper addresses a current issue: the assessment and the establishment of the capital charge for the non-life catastrophic risk (cat risk) in terms of Solvency II Directive. Firstly we’ll present several aspects on the conditions and the defining elements of Solvency II Directive implementation, by positioning us in the underwriting risk module, cat risk being a component of it. Nowadays the cat risk is a concern for the insurance companies and in order to have an harmonized legislation on the insurance industry for all Member States of the European Union this was a sensitive topic being presented various approaches regarding the methods used for determining the level of the capital charge. We’ll present the main methods proposed in the Quantitative Impact Studies QIS4: standard approach, scenarios and personalized scenarios and also those proposed in QIS5: standardised scenarios and factor-based approach. Our purpose is to illustrate the situations when each alternative is most efficient to be used and also the steps taken from one quantitative impact study to another in order to have an accurate method of the cat risk assessment. Taking into account that these are standardised formulas, there are certain cases when the results are not consistent with the reality, especially for the insurers with a different structure of the insured portfolio, for example those having a large part of the insurance policies issued for a single line of business. In these cases it is recommended to use undertaking specific parameters (USP). Once presented these methods we’ll offer an example for the calculation of the capital charge for the earthquake risk using standardised scenarios for Natural Disaster Insurance Pool (PAID). In order to achieve this goal we’ll perform an analysis of the mandatory household insurance policies against natural disasters (PAD policies) in force in December 2013, these being grouped on CRESTA zones to determine the total insured value for each of the 41 zones in Romania. These values being calculated and using the technical parameters offered by an Annex of QIS 5 we obtained a value of around 227 million Euro for the earthquake cat capital requirement for PAID.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:40:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5dc9143246694f57a07d5297b66c0298
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1222-569X
1582-5450
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:40:20Z
publishDate 2014-07-01
publisher University of Oradea
record_format Article
series Annals of the University of Oradea: Economic Science
spelling doaj.art-5dc9143246694f57a07d5297b66c02982022-12-22T03:30:52ZdeuUniversity of OradeaAnnals of the University of Oradea: Economic Science1222-569X1582-54502014-07-01231874882THE SOLVENCY II APPROACH ON THE CAPITAL CHARGE FOR THE NON-LIFE CATASTROPHIC RISKCiumas Cristina0Coca Ramona Alexandrina1Oniga Alexandra2 Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj - Napoca, Romania,Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationBabes-Bolyai University, Cluj - Napoca, Romania,Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationBabes-Bolyai University, Cluj - Napoca, Romania,Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationThis paper addresses a current issue: the assessment and the establishment of the capital charge for the non-life catastrophic risk (cat risk) in terms of Solvency II Directive. Firstly we’ll present several aspects on the conditions and the defining elements of Solvency II Directive implementation, by positioning us in the underwriting risk module, cat risk being a component of it. Nowadays the cat risk is a concern for the insurance companies and in order to have an harmonized legislation on the insurance industry for all Member States of the European Union this was a sensitive topic being presented various approaches regarding the methods used for determining the level of the capital charge. We’ll present the main methods proposed in the Quantitative Impact Studies QIS4: standard approach, scenarios and personalized scenarios and also those proposed in QIS5: standardised scenarios and factor-based approach. Our purpose is to illustrate the situations when each alternative is most efficient to be used and also the steps taken from one quantitative impact study to another in order to have an accurate method of the cat risk assessment. Taking into account that these are standardised formulas, there are certain cases when the results are not consistent with the reality, especially for the insurers with a different structure of the insured portfolio, for example those having a large part of the insurance policies issued for a single line of business. In these cases it is recommended to use undertaking specific parameters (USP). Once presented these methods we’ll offer an example for the calculation of the capital charge for the earthquake risk using standardised scenarios for Natural Disaster Insurance Pool (PAID). In order to achieve this goal we’ll perform an analysis of the mandatory household insurance policies against natural disasters (PAD policies) in force in December 2013, these being grouped on CRESTA zones to determine the total insured value for each of the 41 zones in Romania. These values being calculated and using the technical parameters offered by an Annex of QIS 5 we obtained a value of around 227 million Euro for the earthquake cat capital requirement for PAID.http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2014/n1/096.pdfCRESTA zones, cat risk, Quantitative Impact Studies
spellingShingle Ciumas Cristina
Coca Ramona Alexandrina
Oniga Alexandra
THE SOLVENCY II APPROACH ON THE CAPITAL CHARGE FOR THE NON-LIFE CATASTROPHIC RISK
Annals of the University of Oradea: Economic Science
CRESTA zones, cat risk, Quantitative Impact Studies
title THE SOLVENCY II APPROACH ON THE CAPITAL CHARGE FOR THE NON-LIFE CATASTROPHIC RISK
title_full THE SOLVENCY II APPROACH ON THE CAPITAL CHARGE FOR THE NON-LIFE CATASTROPHIC RISK
title_fullStr THE SOLVENCY II APPROACH ON THE CAPITAL CHARGE FOR THE NON-LIFE CATASTROPHIC RISK
title_full_unstemmed THE SOLVENCY II APPROACH ON THE CAPITAL CHARGE FOR THE NON-LIFE CATASTROPHIC RISK
title_short THE SOLVENCY II APPROACH ON THE CAPITAL CHARGE FOR THE NON-LIFE CATASTROPHIC RISK
title_sort solvency ii approach on the capital charge for the non life catastrophic risk
topic CRESTA zones, cat risk, Quantitative Impact Studies
url http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2014/n1/096.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ciumascristina thesolvencyiiapproachonthecapitalchargeforthenonlifecatastrophicrisk
AT cocaramonaalexandrina thesolvencyiiapproachonthecapitalchargeforthenonlifecatastrophicrisk
AT onigaalexandra thesolvencyiiapproachonthecapitalchargeforthenonlifecatastrophicrisk
AT thesolvencyiiapproachonthecapitalchargeforthenonlifecatastrophicrisk
AT ciumascristina solvencyiiapproachonthecapitalchargeforthenonlifecatastrophicrisk
AT cocaramonaalexandrina solvencyiiapproachonthecapitalchargeforthenonlifecatastrophicrisk
AT onigaalexandra solvencyiiapproachonthecapitalchargeforthenonlifecatastrophicrisk
AT solvencyiiapproachonthecapitalchargeforthenonlifecatastrophicrisk