Contrasting Responses to Harvesting and Environmental Drivers of Fast and Slow Life History Species.

According to their main life history traits, organisms can be arranged in a continuum from fast (species with small body size, short lifespan and high fecundity) to slow (species with opposite characteristics). Life history determines the responses of organisms to natural and anthropogenic factors,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antoni Quetglas, Lucía Rueda, Diego Alvarez-Berastegui, Beatriz Guijarro, Enric Massutí
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4747561?pdf=render
_version_ 1818997780343947264
author Antoni Quetglas
Lucía Rueda
Diego Alvarez-Berastegui
Beatriz Guijarro
Enric Massutí
author_facet Antoni Quetglas
Lucía Rueda
Diego Alvarez-Berastegui
Beatriz Guijarro
Enric Massutí
author_sort Antoni Quetglas
collection DOAJ
description According to their main life history traits, organisms can be arranged in a continuum from fast (species with small body size, short lifespan and high fecundity) to slow (species with opposite characteristics). Life history determines the responses of organisms to natural and anthropogenic factors, as slow species are expected to be more sensitive than fast species to perturbations. Owing to their contrasting traits, cephalopods and elasmobranchs are typical examples of fast and slow strategies, respectively. We investigated the responses of these two contrasting strategies to fishing exploitation and environmental conditions (temperature, productivity and depth) using generalized additive models. Our results confirmed the foreseen contrasting responses of cephalopods and elasmobranchs to natural (environment) and anthropogenic (harvesting) influences. Even though a priori foreseen, we did expect neither the clear-cut differential responses between groups nor the homogeneous sensitivity to the same factors within the two taxonomic groups. Apart from depth, which affected both groups equally, cephalopods and elasmobranchs were exclusively affected by environmental conditions and fishing exploitation, respectively. Owing to its short, annual cycle, cephalopods do not have overlapping generations and consequently lack the buffering effects conferred by different age classes observed in multi-aged species such as elasmobranchs. We suggest that cephalopods are sensitive to short-term perturbations, such as seasonal environmental changes, because they lack this buffering effect but they are in turn not influenced by continuous, long-term moderate disturbances such as fishing because of its high population growth and turnover. The contrary would apply to elasmobranchs, whose multi-aged population structure would buffer the seasonal environmental effects, but they would display strong responses to uninterrupted harvesting due to its low population resilience. Besides providing empirical evidence to the theoretically predicted contrasting responses of cephalopods and elasmobranchs to disturbances, our results are useful for the sustainable exploitation of these resources.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T21:51:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5dc96a05a57542e7bb831173d9c0bc89
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T21:51:04Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-5dc96a05a57542e7bb831173d9c0bc892022-12-21T19:25:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e014877010.1371/journal.pone.0148770Contrasting Responses to Harvesting and Environmental Drivers of Fast and Slow Life History Species.Antoni QuetglasLucía RuedaDiego Alvarez-BerasteguiBeatriz GuijarroEnric MassutíAccording to their main life history traits, organisms can be arranged in a continuum from fast (species with small body size, short lifespan and high fecundity) to slow (species with opposite characteristics). Life history determines the responses of organisms to natural and anthropogenic factors, as slow species are expected to be more sensitive than fast species to perturbations. Owing to their contrasting traits, cephalopods and elasmobranchs are typical examples of fast and slow strategies, respectively. We investigated the responses of these two contrasting strategies to fishing exploitation and environmental conditions (temperature, productivity and depth) using generalized additive models. Our results confirmed the foreseen contrasting responses of cephalopods and elasmobranchs to natural (environment) and anthropogenic (harvesting) influences. Even though a priori foreseen, we did expect neither the clear-cut differential responses between groups nor the homogeneous sensitivity to the same factors within the two taxonomic groups. Apart from depth, which affected both groups equally, cephalopods and elasmobranchs were exclusively affected by environmental conditions and fishing exploitation, respectively. Owing to its short, annual cycle, cephalopods do not have overlapping generations and consequently lack the buffering effects conferred by different age classes observed in multi-aged species such as elasmobranchs. We suggest that cephalopods are sensitive to short-term perturbations, such as seasonal environmental changes, because they lack this buffering effect but they are in turn not influenced by continuous, long-term moderate disturbances such as fishing because of its high population growth and turnover. The contrary would apply to elasmobranchs, whose multi-aged population structure would buffer the seasonal environmental effects, but they would display strong responses to uninterrupted harvesting due to its low population resilience. Besides providing empirical evidence to the theoretically predicted contrasting responses of cephalopods and elasmobranchs to disturbances, our results are useful for the sustainable exploitation of these resources.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4747561?pdf=render
spellingShingle Antoni Quetglas
Lucía Rueda
Diego Alvarez-Berastegui
Beatriz Guijarro
Enric Massutí
Contrasting Responses to Harvesting and Environmental Drivers of Fast and Slow Life History Species.
PLoS ONE
title Contrasting Responses to Harvesting and Environmental Drivers of Fast and Slow Life History Species.
title_full Contrasting Responses to Harvesting and Environmental Drivers of Fast and Slow Life History Species.
title_fullStr Contrasting Responses to Harvesting and Environmental Drivers of Fast and Slow Life History Species.
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting Responses to Harvesting and Environmental Drivers of Fast and Slow Life History Species.
title_short Contrasting Responses to Harvesting and Environmental Drivers of Fast and Slow Life History Species.
title_sort contrasting responses to harvesting and environmental drivers of fast and slow life history species
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4747561?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniquetglas contrastingresponsestoharvestingandenvironmentaldriversoffastandslowlifehistoryspecies
AT luciarueda contrastingresponsestoharvestingandenvironmentaldriversoffastandslowlifehistoryspecies
AT diegoalvarezberastegui contrastingresponsestoharvestingandenvironmentaldriversoffastandslowlifehistoryspecies
AT beatrizguijarro contrastingresponsestoharvestingandenvironmentaldriversoffastandslowlifehistoryspecies
AT enricmassuti contrastingresponsestoharvestingandenvironmentaldriversoffastandslowlifehistoryspecies