Single opsin driven white noise ERGs in mice

PurposeElectroretinograms elicited by photopigment isolating white noise stimuli (wnERGs) in mice were measured. The dependency of rod- and cone-opsin-driven wnERGs on mean luminance was studied.MethodsTemporal white noise stimuli (containing all frequencies up to 20 Hz, equal amplitudes, random pha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nina Stallwitz, Anneka Joachimsthaler, Jan Kremers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1211329/full
_version_ 1827889606150848512
author Nina Stallwitz
Nina Stallwitz
Anneka Joachimsthaler
Anneka Joachimsthaler
Jan Kremers
author_facet Nina Stallwitz
Nina Stallwitz
Anneka Joachimsthaler
Anneka Joachimsthaler
Jan Kremers
author_sort Nina Stallwitz
collection DOAJ
description PurposeElectroretinograms elicited by photopigment isolating white noise stimuli (wnERGs) in mice were measured. The dependency of rod- and cone-opsin-driven wnERGs on mean luminance was studied.MethodsTemporal white noise stimuli (containing all frequencies up to 20 Hz, equal amplitudes, random phases) that modulated either rhodopsin, S-opsin or L*-opsin, using the double silent substitution technique, were used to record wnERGs in mice expressing a human L*-opsin instead of the native murine M-opsin. Responses were recorded at 4 mean luminances (MLs).Impulse response functions (IRFs) were obtained by cross-correlating the wnERG recordings with the corresponding modulation of the photopigment excitation elicited by the stimulus. So-called modulation transfer functions (MTFs) were obtained by performing a Fourier transform on the IRFs.Potentials of two repeated wnERG recordings at corresponding time points were plotted against each other. The correlation coefficient (r2repr) of the linear regression through these data was used to quantify reproducibility. Another correlation coefficient (r2ML) was used to quantify the correlations of the wnERGs obtained at different MLs with those at the highest (for cone isolating stimuli) or lowest (for rod isolating stimuli) ML.ResultsIRFs showed an initial negative (a-wave like) trough N1 and a subsequent positive (b-wave like) peak P1. No oscillatory potential-like components were observed. At 0.4 and 1.0 log cd/m2 ML robust L*- and S-opsin-driven IRFs were obtained that displayed similar latencies and dependencies on ML. L*-opsin-driven IRFs were 2.5–3 times larger than S-opsin-driven IRFs. Rhodopsin-driven IRFs were observed at −0.8 and − 0.2 log cd/m2 and decreased in amplitude with increasing ML. They displayed an additional pronounced late negativity (N2), which may be a correlate of retinal ganglion cell activity.R2repr and r2ML values increased for cones with increasing ML whereas they decreased for rods. For rhodopsin-driven MTFs at low MLs and L*-opsin-driven MTFs at high MLs amplitudes decreased with increasing frequency, with much faster decreasing amplitudes for rhodopsin. A delay was calculated from MTF phases showing larger delays for rhodopsin- vs. low delays for L*-opsin-driven responses.ConclusionOpsin-isolating wnERGs in mice show characteristics of different retinal cell types and their connected pathways.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:58:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5dded5fc55ad45979fd2e824d79a5a4b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:58:01Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-5dded5fc55ad45979fd2e824d79a5a4b2023-07-31T11:08:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2023-07-011710.3389/fnins.2023.12113291211329Single opsin driven white noise ERGs in miceNina Stallwitz0Nina Stallwitz1Anneka Joachimsthaler2Anneka Joachimsthaler3Jan Kremers4Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, GermanyAnimal Physiology, Department of Biology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, GermanyAnimal Physiology, Department of Biology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, GermanyPurposeElectroretinograms elicited by photopigment isolating white noise stimuli (wnERGs) in mice were measured. The dependency of rod- and cone-opsin-driven wnERGs on mean luminance was studied.MethodsTemporal white noise stimuli (containing all frequencies up to 20 Hz, equal amplitudes, random phases) that modulated either rhodopsin, S-opsin or L*-opsin, using the double silent substitution technique, were used to record wnERGs in mice expressing a human L*-opsin instead of the native murine M-opsin. Responses were recorded at 4 mean luminances (MLs).Impulse response functions (IRFs) were obtained by cross-correlating the wnERG recordings with the corresponding modulation of the photopigment excitation elicited by the stimulus. So-called modulation transfer functions (MTFs) were obtained by performing a Fourier transform on the IRFs.Potentials of two repeated wnERG recordings at corresponding time points were plotted against each other. The correlation coefficient (r2repr) of the linear regression through these data was used to quantify reproducibility. Another correlation coefficient (r2ML) was used to quantify the correlations of the wnERGs obtained at different MLs with those at the highest (for cone isolating stimuli) or lowest (for rod isolating stimuli) ML.ResultsIRFs showed an initial negative (a-wave like) trough N1 and a subsequent positive (b-wave like) peak P1. No oscillatory potential-like components were observed. At 0.4 and 1.0 log cd/m2 ML robust L*- and S-opsin-driven IRFs were obtained that displayed similar latencies and dependencies on ML. L*-opsin-driven IRFs were 2.5–3 times larger than S-opsin-driven IRFs. Rhodopsin-driven IRFs were observed at −0.8 and − 0.2 log cd/m2 and decreased in amplitude with increasing ML. They displayed an additional pronounced late negativity (N2), which may be a correlate of retinal ganglion cell activity.R2repr and r2ML values increased for cones with increasing ML whereas they decreased for rods. For rhodopsin-driven MTFs at low MLs and L*-opsin-driven MTFs at high MLs amplitudes decreased with increasing frequency, with much faster decreasing amplitudes for rhodopsin. A delay was calculated from MTF phases showing larger delays for rhodopsin- vs. low delays for L*-opsin-driven responses.ConclusionOpsin-isolating wnERGs in mice show characteristics of different retinal cell types and their connected pathways.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1211329/fullelectroretinography (ERG)mouse retinaphotopigmentsilent substitutiontemporal white noise (TWN)
spellingShingle Nina Stallwitz
Nina Stallwitz
Anneka Joachimsthaler
Anneka Joachimsthaler
Jan Kremers
Single opsin driven white noise ERGs in mice
Frontiers in Neuroscience
electroretinography (ERG)
mouse retina
photopigment
silent substitution
temporal white noise (TWN)
title Single opsin driven white noise ERGs in mice
title_full Single opsin driven white noise ERGs in mice
title_fullStr Single opsin driven white noise ERGs in mice
title_full_unstemmed Single opsin driven white noise ERGs in mice
title_short Single opsin driven white noise ERGs in mice
title_sort single opsin driven white noise ergs in mice
topic electroretinography (ERG)
mouse retina
photopigment
silent substitution
temporal white noise (TWN)
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1211329/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ninastallwitz singleopsindrivenwhitenoiseergsinmice
AT ninastallwitz singleopsindrivenwhitenoiseergsinmice
AT annekajoachimsthaler singleopsindrivenwhitenoiseergsinmice
AT annekajoachimsthaler singleopsindrivenwhitenoiseergsinmice
AT jankremers singleopsindrivenwhitenoiseergsinmice