Examining the impact of cue similarity and fear learning on perceptual tuning

Abstract Past research on the effects of associative aversive learning on discrimination acuity has shown mixed results, including increases, decreases, and no changes in discrimination ability. An animal study found that the type of learning experience determined the direction and extent of learnin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonas Zaman, Kenny Yu, Marta Andreatta, Matthias J. Wieser, Yannik Stegmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40166-w
_version_ 1797559901853057024
author Jonas Zaman
Kenny Yu
Marta Andreatta
Matthias J. Wieser
Yannik Stegmann
author_facet Jonas Zaman
Kenny Yu
Marta Andreatta
Matthias J. Wieser
Yannik Stegmann
author_sort Jonas Zaman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Past research on the effects of associative aversive learning on discrimination acuity has shown mixed results, including increases, decreases, and no changes in discrimination ability. An animal study found that the type of learning experience determined the direction and extent of learning-induced changes. The current preregistered web-based study aimed to translate these findings to humans. Experiment 1 (N = 245) compared changes in stimulus discrimination between simple learning (only one oriented grating cue), coarse differential conditioning (physically distinct cues), and fine differential conditioning (physically similar cues) as well as to their three respective control groups. The discrimination task consisted of a two-alternative-forced-choice task with oriented grating stimuli. During learning, a specific orientation was paired with unpleasant pictures. Our analysis using generative modeling demonstrated weak to moderate evidence that aversive learning did not alter discrimination acuity in any of the groups. In a follow-up experiment (N = 121), we replicated these findings despite successful learning trajectories in all three groups and a more detailed assessment of discrimination acuity. Contrary to prior assumptions, our findings indicate that aversive learning does not enhance perceptual discrimination, and the presence of additional safety cues does not appear to moderate this effect.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T17:51:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5de9f5fe91884a3096351e4945baf729
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T17:51:46Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-5de9f5fe91884a3096351e4945baf7292023-11-20T09:19:39ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-08-0113111210.1038/s41598-023-40166-wExamining the impact of cue similarity and fear learning on perceptual tuningJonas Zaman0Kenny Yu1Marta Andreatta2Matthias J. Wieser3Yannik Stegmann4Centre for the Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, KU LeuvenQuantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU LeuvenDepartment of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University RotterdamDepartment of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University RotterdamDepartment of Psychology (Experimental Clinical Psychology), University of WürzburgAbstract Past research on the effects of associative aversive learning on discrimination acuity has shown mixed results, including increases, decreases, and no changes in discrimination ability. An animal study found that the type of learning experience determined the direction and extent of learning-induced changes. The current preregistered web-based study aimed to translate these findings to humans. Experiment 1 (N = 245) compared changes in stimulus discrimination between simple learning (only one oriented grating cue), coarse differential conditioning (physically distinct cues), and fine differential conditioning (physically similar cues) as well as to their three respective control groups. The discrimination task consisted of a two-alternative-forced-choice task with oriented grating stimuli. During learning, a specific orientation was paired with unpleasant pictures. Our analysis using generative modeling demonstrated weak to moderate evidence that aversive learning did not alter discrimination acuity in any of the groups. In a follow-up experiment (N = 121), we replicated these findings despite successful learning trajectories in all three groups and a more detailed assessment of discrimination acuity. Contrary to prior assumptions, our findings indicate that aversive learning does not enhance perceptual discrimination, and the presence of additional safety cues does not appear to moderate this effect.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40166-w
spellingShingle Jonas Zaman
Kenny Yu
Marta Andreatta
Matthias J. Wieser
Yannik Stegmann
Examining the impact of cue similarity and fear learning on perceptual tuning
Scientific Reports
title Examining the impact of cue similarity and fear learning on perceptual tuning
title_full Examining the impact of cue similarity and fear learning on perceptual tuning
title_fullStr Examining the impact of cue similarity and fear learning on perceptual tuning
title_full_unstemmed Examining the impact of cue similarity and fear learning on perceptual tuning
title_short Examining the impact of cue similarity and fear learning on perceptual tuning
title_sort examining the impact of cue similarity and fear learning on perceptual tuning
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40166-w
work_keys_str_mv AT jonaszaman examiningtheimpactofcuesimilarityandfearlearningonperceptualtuning
AT kennyyu examiningtheimpactofcuesimilarityandfearlearningonperceptualtuning
AT martaandreatta examiningtheimpactofcuesimilarityandfearlearningonperceptualtuning
AT matthiasjwieser examiningtheimpactofcuesimilarityandfearlearningonperceptualtuning
AT yannikstegmann examiningtheimpactofcuesimilarityandfearlearningonperceptualtuning