Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment
Abstract Objectives To evaluate the correlation between ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessments in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients. Design Prospective, observational study. Setting Tertiary teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU) in Montevideo, Uruguay...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-08-01
|
Series: | The Ultrasound Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13089-020-00188-1 |
_version_ | 1831739349803204608 |
---|---|
author | Christian D. Yic Gabriel Prada Sergio I. Paz Leandro Moraes Julio C. Pontet Marcos E. Lasso Alberto Biestro |
author_facet | Christian D. Yic Gabriel Prada Sergio I. Paz Leandro Moraes Julio C. Pontet Marcos E. Lasso Alberto Biestro |
author_sort | Christian D. Yic |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Objectives To evaluate the correlation between ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessments in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients. Design Prospective, observational study. Setting Tertiary teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU) in Montevideo, Uruguay. Patients Twenty-six adults patients with age 18 or older admitted to the intensive care unit with and without neurologic pathology. A total of 212 pupillary measures were made between ultrasonographic pupillary assessment (UPA) and infrared pupillary assessment (IPA). Interventions This was a study that utilized non-invasive (minimal risk) ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessment in patients admitted to the ICU. Time between UPA and IPA in a single patient was consistently less than 3 min. Measurements and main results There was a strong positive association between UPA and IPA (right eye [OD]: r = de 0.926, p-value < 0.001; left eye [OS], r = 0.965, p-value < 0.001), also observed in the group of neurocritically ill patients (OD: r = 0.935, p-value < 0.001; OS: r = de 0.965, p-value < 0.001). Taking IPA as reference measure, the percent error for all subjects was 2.77% and 2.15% for OD and OS, respectively, and for neurocritically ill patients it was 3.21% and 2.44% for OD and OS, respectively. Conclusions Ultrasonographic pupillary assessment is strongly correlated with infrared pupillary assessment in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients. Ultrasonographic pupillary assessment is a quick, feasible, non-invasive method that allows accurate pupillary assessment, particularly neurologic function, in patients in whom a more precise measurement of the pupil is required or eye opening is not possible (e.g., periorbital edema due to traumatic brain injury). |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T13:38:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-5df77470a3dd4f2a96303637ffed673e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2524-8987 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T13:38:09Z |
publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | The Ultrasound Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-5df77470a3dd4f2a96303637ffed673e2022-12-21T19:02:06ZengSpringerOpenThe Ultrasound Journal2524-89872020-08-0112111010.1186/s13089-020-00188-1Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessmentChristian D. Yic0Gabriel Prada1Sergio I. Paz2Leandro Moraes3Julio C. Pontet4Marcos E. Lasso5Alberto Biestro6Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital de ClínicasDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo ClinicDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital PasteurDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital de ClínicasDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital PasteurDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital de ClínicasDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital de ClínicasAbstract Objectives To evaluate the correlation between ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessments in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients. Design Prospective, observational study. Setting Tertiary teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU) in Montevideo, Uruguay. Patients Twenty-six adults patients with age 18 or older admitted to the intensive care unit with and without neurologic pathology. A total of 212 pupillary measures were made between ultrasonographic pupillary assessment (UPA) and infrared pupillary assessment (IPA). Interventions This was a study that utilized non-invasive (minimal risk) ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessment in patients admitted to the ICU. Time between UPA and IPA in a single patient was consistently less than 3 min. Measurements and main results There was a strong positive association between UPA and IPA (right eye [OD]: r = de 0.926, p-value < 0.001; left eye [OS], r = 0.965, p-value < 0.001), also observed in the group of neurocritically ill patients (OD: r = 0.935, p-value < 0.001; OS: r = de 0.965, p-value < 0.001). Taking IPA as reference measure, the percent error for all subjects was 2.77% and 2.15% for OD and OS, respectively, and for neurocritically ill patients it was 3.21% and 2.44% for OD and OS, respectively. Conclusions Ultrasonographic pupillary assessment is strongly correlated with infrared pupillary assessment in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients. Ultrasonographic pupillary assessment is a quick, feasible, non-invasive method that allows accurate pupillary assessment, particularly neurologic function, in patients in whom a more precise measurement of the pupil is required or eye opening is not possible (e.g., periorbital edema due to traumatic brain injury).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13089-020-00188-1Ocular ultrasonographyOcular ultrasoundPupillometryPupillary assessmentTraumatic brain injuryBrain herniation |
spellingShingle | Christian D. Yic Gabriel Prada Sergio I. Paz Leandro Moraes Julio C. Pontet Marcos E. Lasso Alberto Biestro Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment The Ultrasound Journal Ocular ultrasonography Ocular ultrasound Pupillometry Pupillary assessment Traumatic brain injury Brain herniation |
title | Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment |
title_full | Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment |
title_fullStr | Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment |
title_short | Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment |
title_sort | comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment |
topic | Ocular ultrasonography Ocular ultrasound Pupillometry Pupillary assessment Traumatic brain injury Brain herniation |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13089-020-00188-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christiandyic comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment AT gabrielprada comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment AT sergioipaz comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment AT leandromoraes comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment AT juliocpontet comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment AT marcoselasso comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment AT albertobiestro comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment |