Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the correlation between ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessments in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients. Design Prospective, observational study. Setting Tertiary teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU) in Montevideo, Uruguay...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian D. Yic, Gabriel Prada, Sergio I. Paz, Leandro Moraes, Julio C. Pontet, Marcos E. Lasso, Alberto Biestro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-08-01
Series:The Ultrasound Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13089-020-00188-1
_version_ 1831739349803204608
author Christian D. Yic
Gabriel Prada
Sergio I. Paz
Leandro Moraes
Julio C. Pontet
Marcos E. Lasso
Alberto Biestro
author_facet Christian D. Yic
Gabriel Prada
Sergio I. Paz
Leandro Moraes
Julio C. Pontet
Marcos E. Lasso
Alberto Biestro
author_sort Christian D. Yic
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives To evaluate the correlation between ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessments in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients. Design Prospective, observational study. Setting Tertiary teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU) in Montevideo, Uruguay. Patients Twenty-six adults patients with age 18 or older admitted to the intensive care unit with and without neurologic pathology. A total of 212 pupillary measures were made between ultrasonographic pupillary assessment (UPA) and infrared pupillary assessment (IPA). Interventions This was a study that utilized non-invasive (minimal risk) ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessment in patients admitted to the ICU. Time between UPA and IPA in a single patient was consistently less than 3 min. Measurements and main results There was a strong positive association between UPA and IPA (right eye [OD]: r = de 0.926, p-value < 0.001; left eye [OS], r = 0.965, p-value < 0.001), also observed in the group of neurocritically ill patients (OD: r = 0.935, p-value < 0.001; OS: r = de 0.965, p-value < 0.001). Taking IPA as reference measure, the percent error for all subjects was 2.77% and 2.15% for OD and OS, respectively, and for neurocritically ill patients it was 3.21% and 2.44% for OD and OS, respectively. Conclusions Ultrasonographic pupillary assessment is strongly correlated with infrared pupillary assessment in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients. Ultrasonographic pupillary assessment is a quick, feasible, non-invasive method that allows accurate pupillary assessment, particularly neurologic function, in patients in whom a more precise measurement of the pupil is required or eye opening is not possible (e.g., periorbital edema due to traumatic brain injury).
first_indexed 2024-12-21T13:38:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5df77470a3dd4f2a96303637ffed673e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2524-8987
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T13:38:09Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Ultrasound Journal
spelling doaj.art-5df77470a3dd4f2a96303637ffed673e2022-12-21T19:02:06ZengSpringerOpenThe Ultrasound Journal2524-89872020-08-0112111010.1186/s13089-020-00188-1Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessmentChristian D. Yic0Gabriel Prada1Sergio I. Paz2Leandro Moraes3Julio C. Pontet4Marcos E. Lasso5Alberto Biestro6Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital de ClínicasDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo ClinicDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital PasteurDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital de ClínicasDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital PasteurDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital de ClínicasDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital de ClínicasAbstract Objectives To evaluate the correlation between ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessments in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients. Design Prospective, observational study. Setting Tertiary teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU) in Montevideo, Uruguay. Patients Twenty-six adults patients with age 18 or older admitted to the intensive care unit with and without neurologic pathology. A total of 212 pupillary measures were made between ultrasonographic pupillary assessment (UPA) and infrared pupillary assessment (IPA). Interventions This was a study that utilized non-invasive (minimal risk) ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessment in patients admitted to the ICU. Time between UPA and IPA in a single patient was consistently less than 3 min. Measurements and main results There was a strong positive association between UPA and IPA (right eye [OD]: r = de 0.926, p-value < 0.001; left eye [OS], r = 0.965, p-value < 0.001), also observed in the group of neurocritically ill patients (OD: r = 0.935, p-value < 0.001; OS: r = de 0.965, p-value < 0.001). Taking IPA as reference measure, the percent error for all subjects was 2.77% and 2.15% for OD and OS, respectively, and for neurocritically ill patients it was 3.21% and 2.44% for OD and OS, respectively. Conclusions Ultrasonographic pupillary assessment is strongly correlated with infrared pupillary assessment in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients. Ultrasonographic pupillary assessment is a quick, feasible, non-invasive method that allows accurate pupillary assessment, particularly neurologic function, in patients in whom a more precise measurement of the pupil is required or eye opening is not possible (e.g., periorbital edema due to traumatic brain injury).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13089-020-00188-1Ocular ultrasonographyOcular ultrasoundPupillometryPupillary assessmentTraumatic brain injuryBrain herniation
spellingShingle Christian D. Yic
Gabriel Prada
Sergio I. Paz
Leandro Moraes
Julio C. Pontet
Marcos E. Lasso
Alberto Biestro
Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment
The Ultrasound Journal
Ocular ultrasonography
Ocular ultrasound
Pupillometry
Pupillary assessment
Traumatic brain injury
Brain herniation
title Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment
title_full Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment
title_fullStr Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment
title_short Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment
title_sort comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment
topic Ocular ultrasonography
Ocular ultrasound
Pupillometry
Pupillary assessment
Traumatic brain injury
Brain herniation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13089-020-00188-1
work_keys_str_mv AT christiandyic comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment
AT gabrielprada comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment
AT sergioipaz comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment
AT leandromoraes comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment
AT juliocpontet comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment
AT marcoselasso comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment
AT albertobiestro comparisonofultrasonographicversusinfraredpupillaryassessment