Legal and illegal export of cultural heritage artefacts from developing countries: Protection of cultural heritage in South Africa

AbstractCultural heritage is an important part of the capital of developing countries that can be leveraged for sustainable development. However, it also needs protection as the rise in the illegal trade of cultural artefacts shows. South Africa as an example of a middle-income African country that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jen Snowball, Alan Collins, Craig Bickerton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Cogent Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311886.2023.2206345
_version_ 1797198295114711040
author Jen Snowball
Alan Collins
Craig Bickerton
author_facet Jen Snowball
Alan Collins
Craig Bickerton
author_sort Jen Snowball
collection DOAJ
description AbstractCultural heritage is an important part of the capital of developing countries that can be leveraged for sustainable development. However, it also needs protection as the rise in the illegal trade of cultural artefacts shows. South Africa as an example of a middle-income African country that seeks to promote cultural heritage for development. As part of the attempt to preserve cultural capital, the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) is tasked with the protection of cultural heritage that is of special cultural, historical, aesthetic or technical importance to the country, and is thus part of the “national estate”. SAHRA adjudicates applications for the permanent export of cultural artefacts, guided by national policy that defines the attributes of artefacts of national importance. There are also attempts to bypass SAHRA adjudication through illegal smuggling of important art and artefacts, which SAHRA also tracks through a database of artefacts reported stolen. This study analyses the way that SAHRA has applied the policy to make decisions about permanent export applications of cultural heritage artefacts, as well as the attributes of those artefacts reported stolen and thus lost to the national estate. Results showed that the SAHRA permit system seems to be providing effective protection for some of South Africa’s cultural heritage, but only 4% of applications were for art and artefacts representing black African cultures.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:46:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5e05fb174fbd426f9362609213e7c9e3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-1886
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T06:57:35Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Social Sciences
spelling doaj.art-5e05fb174fbd426f9362609213e7c9e32024-04-22T10:42:48ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Social Sciences2331-18862023-12-019110.1080/23311886.2023.2206345Legal and illegal export of cultural heritage artefacts from developing countries: Protection of cultural heritage in South AfricaJen Snowball0Alan Collins1Craig Bickerton2Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South AfricaProfessor of Economics, Department of Economics, Nottingham-Trent University, Nottingham, UKSenior Lecturer, Department of Economics, Nottingham-Trent University, Nottingham, UKAbstractCultural heritage is an important part of the capital of developing countries that can be leveraged for sustainable development. However, it also needs protection as the rise in the illegal trade of cultural artefacts shows. South Africa as an example of a middle-income African country that seeks to promote cultural heritage for development. As part of the attempt to preserve cultural capital, the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) is tasked with the protection of cultural heritage that is of special cultural, historical, aesthetic or technical importance to the country, and is thus part of the “national estate”. SAHRA adjudicates applications for the permanent export of cultural artefacts, guided by national policy that defines the attributes of artefacts of national importance. There are also attempts to bypass SAHRA adjudication through illegal smuggling of important art and artefacts, which SAHRA also tracks through a database of artefacts reported stolen. This study analyses the way that SAHRA has applied the policy to make decisions about permanent export applications of cultural heritage artefacts, as well as the attributes of those artefacts reported stolen and thus lost to the national estate. Results showed that the SAHRA permit system seems to be providing effective protection for some of South Africa’s cultural heritage, but only 4% of applications were for art and artefacts representing black African cultures.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311886.2023.2206345heritageexportillegalnational estatedevelopment
spellingShingle Jen Snowball
Alan Collins
Craig Bickerton
Legal and illegal export of cultural heritage artefacts from developing countries: Protection of cultural heritage in South Africa
Cogent Social Sciences
heritage
export
illegal
national estate
development
title Legal and illegal export of cultural heritage artefacts from developing countries: Protection of cultural heritage in South Africa
title_full Legal and illegal export of cultural heritage artefacts from developing countries: Protection of cultural heritage in South Africa
title_fullStr Legal and illegal export of cultural heritage artefacts from developing countries: Protection of cultural heritage in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Legal and illegal export of cultural heritage artefacts from developing countries: Protection of cultural heritage in South Africa
title_short Legal and illegal export of cultural heritage artefacts from developing countries: Protection of cultural heritage in South Africa
title_sort legal and illegal export of cultural heritage artefacts from developing countries protection of cultural heritage in south africa
topic heritage
export
illegal
national estate
development
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311886.2023.2206345
work_keys_str_mv AT jensnowball legalandillegalexportofculturalheritageartefactsfromdevelopingcountriesprotectionofculturalheritageinsouthafrica
AT alancollins legalandillegalexportofculturalheritageartefactsfromdevelopingcountriesprotectionofculturalheritageinsouthafrica
AT craigbickerton legalandillegalexportofculturalheritageartefactsfromdevelopingcountriesprotectionofculturalheritageinsouthafrica