Meta-analysis of the efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction for astigmatism correction after cyclotorsion compensation

AIM: To compare the efficacy of and without small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)with cyclotorsion compensation for astigmatism correction.METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane and CNKI, VIP, CBM, and Wan Fang Data were searched for clinically controlled studies from January 2010 to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhi-Feng Lu, Zi-Chen Wang, Jia-Jun Lu, Jia-Jia Zhou, Ying Yu, Shu Liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2023-05-01
Series:Guoji Yanke Zazhi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2023/5/202305016.pdf
_version_ 1797837841174102016
author Zhi-Feng Lu
Zi-Chen Wang
Jia-Jun Lu
Jia-Jia Zhou
Ying Yu
Shu Liang
author_facet Zhi-Feng Lu
Zi-Chen Wang
Jia-Jun Lu
Jia-Jia Zhou
Ying Yu
Shu Liang
author_sort Zhi-Feng Lu
collection DOAJ
description AIM: To compare the efficacy of and without small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)with cyclotorsion compensation for astigmatism correction.METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane and CNKI, VIP, CBM, and Wan Fang Data were searched for clinically controlled studies from January 2010 to August 2022, including an experimental group with cyclotorsion compensation during SMILE and a control group without cyclotorsion compensation during SMILE. After literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction by two researchers independently, the Meta-analysis of uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA), residual astigmatism, vector analysis indicators for measuring the astigmatism correction including absolute value of angle of error(|AE|)and magnitude error(ME), and post-operative total higher order aberrations, spherical aberration and coma was carried out with Stata 16.0 software.RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 846 eyes(442 in the experimental group, 404 in the control group)were finally included. The Meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences in the percentage of eyes with residual astigmatism ≥1.00D(OR=0.17, 95%CI: 0.06~0.49, P<0.01), |AE|(WMD=-1.56, 95%CI: -2.68~-0.45, P<0.01), the coma(WMD=0.06, 95%CI: -0.08~-0.04, P<0.01), and the total higher order aberrations(WMD=-0.04, 95%CI: -0.06~-0.02, P<0.01). However, there were no differences in the postoperative UDVA(WMD=0.00, 95%CI: -0.02~0.01, P=0.54), residual astigmatism(WMD=0.08, 95%CI: -0.02~0.18, P=0.10), ME(WMD=-0.01, 95%CI: -0.14~0.12, P=0.85), and the spherical aberration(WMD=0.03, 95%CI: -0.07~0.13, P=0.52).CONCLUSION: Cyclotorsion compensation in SMILE can reduce the angular error caused by eye rotation during astigmatism correction. It also decreases postoperative residual astigmatism. Overall, the SMILE with cyclotorsion compensation is superior in clinical efficacy of the precise correction of astigmatism.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:32:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5e0d19f6778e44dd9122bcff45d8a4dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1672-5123
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:32:15Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
record_format Article
series Guoji Yanke Zazhi
spelling doaj.art-5e0d19f6778e44dd9122bcff45d8a4dc2023-04-28T06:27:01ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)Guoji Yanke Zazhi1672-51232023-05-0123579780310.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2023.5.16202305016Meta-analysis of the efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction for astigmatism correction after cyclotorsion compensationZhi-Feng Lu0Zi-Chen Wang1Jia-Jun Lu2Jia-Jia Zhou3Ying Yu4Shu Liang5Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China; Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China; Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China; Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China; Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China; Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China; Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, ChinaAIM: To compare the efficacy of and without small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)with cyclotorsion compensation for astigmatism correction.METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane and CNKI, VIP, CBM, and Wan Fang Data were searched for clinically controlled studies from January 2010 to August 2022, including an experimental group with cyclotorsion compensation during SMILE and a control group without cyclotorsion compensation during SMILE. After literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction by two researchers independently, the Meta-analysis of uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA), residual astigmatism, vector analysis indicators for measuring the astigmatism correction including absolute value of angle of error(|AE|)and magnitude error(ME), and post-operative total higher order aberrations, spherical aberration and coma was carried out with Stata 16.0 software.RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 846 eyes(442 in the experimental group, 404 in the control group)were finally included. The Meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences in the percentage of eyes with residual astigmatism ≥1.00D(OR=0.17, 95%CI: 0.06~0.49, P<0.01), |AE|(WMD=-1.56, 95%CI: -2.68~-0.45, P<0.01), the coma(WMD=0.06, 95%CI: -0.08~-0.04, P<0.01), and the total higher order aberrations(WMD=-0.04, 95%CI: -0.06~-0.02, P<0.01). However, there were no differences in the postoperative UDVA(WMD=0.00, 95%CI: -0.02~0.01, P=0.54), residual astigmatism(WMD=0.08, 95%CI: -0.02~0.18, P=0.10), ME(WMD=-0.01, 95%CI: -0.14~0.12, P=0.85), and the spherical aberration(WMD=0.03, 95%CI: -0.07~0.13, P=0.52).CONCLUSION: Cyclotorsion compensation in SMILE can reduce the angular error caused by eye rotation during astigmatism correction. It also decreases postoperative residual astigmatism. Overall, the SMILE with cyclotorsion compensation is superior in clinical efficacy of the precise correction of astigmatism.http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2023/5/202305016.pdfsmall incision lenticule extractionastigmatismcyclotorsion compensationmeta analysis
spellingShingle Zhi-Feng Lu
Zi-Chen Wang
Jia-Jun Lu
Jia-Jia Zhou
Ying Yu
Shu Liang
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction for astigmatism correction after cyclotorsion compensation
Guoji Yanke Zazhi
small incision lenticule extraction
astigmatism
cyclotorsion compensation
meta analysis
title Meta-analysis of the efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction for astigmatism correction after cyclotorsion compensation
title_full Meta-analysis of the efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction for astigmatism correction after cyclotorsion compensation
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction for astigmatism correction after cyclotorsion compensation
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction for astigmatism correction after cyclotorsion compensation
title_short Meta-analysis of the efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction for astigmatism correction after cyclotorsion compensation
title_sort meta analysis of the efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction for astigmatism correction after cyclotorsion compensation
topic small incision lenticule extraction
astigmatism
cyclotorsion compensation
meta analysis
url http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2023/5/202305016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zhifenglu metaanalysisoftheefficacyofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionforastigmatismcorrectionaftercyclotorsioncompensation
AT zichenwang metaanalysisoftheefficacyofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionforastigmatismcorrectionaftercyclotorsioncompensation
AT jiajunlu metaanalysisoftheefficacyofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionforastigmatismcorrectionaftercyclotorsioncompensation
AT jiajiazhou metaanalysisoftheefficacyofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionforastigmatismcorrectionaftercyclotorsioncompensation
AT yingyu metaanalysisoftheefficacyofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionforastigmatismcorrectionaftercyclotorsioncompensation
AT shuliang metaanalysisoftheefficacyofsmallincisionlenticuleextractionforastigmatismcorrectionaftercyclotorsioncompensation