Comparison of the Pathological Findings by Endorectal Ultrasonography in Pre-operative Staging of Rectum Cancer
INTRODUCTION: Preoperative staging of rectum cancer is of great importance as it is decisive in choosing one of the many treatment options available today. Endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) may demonstrate the stage of rectal cancer, invasion of the tumor through the rectal wall and mesorectum, and...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Van Yuzuncu Yil University, School of Medicine
2022-04-01
|
Series: | Van Tıp Dergisi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=vtd&un=VTD-03083 |
_version_ | 1797426402447851520 |
---|---|
author | Muharrem Oner Nadir Adnan Hacım |
author_facet | Muharrem Oner Nadir Adnan Hacım |
author_sort | Muharrem Oner |
collection | DOAJ |
description | INTRODUCTION: Preoperative staging of rectum cancer is of great importance as it is decisive in choosing one of the many treatment options available today. Endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) may demonstrate the stage of rectal cancer, invasion of the tumor through the rectal wall and mesorectum, and the lymph node involvement. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of ERUS in rectal cancer staging according to pathology results. METHODS: In this study, the impact of preoperative staging with ERUS was investigated retrospectively in 40 patients with rectal tumors and compared with the final histopathological diagnosis based on the TNM staging. RESULTS: In our 3-year follow-up of patients, a comparison of ERUS outcomes with the final pathological diagnosis revealed that the correct stage was reached in 27 of 40 cases. The accuracy rate of ERUS in the differential diagnosis was 67.5%, and it was found to be significantly different from the pathological diagnoses. The total accuracy rate of ERUS in differential diagnosis of lymph node metastasis was found to be 61.5%, but there was no significant difference compared to pathological diagnoses. The sensitivity of ERUS was 71%, and specificity was 50%, but no significant difference was found compared to pathological diagnoses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: ERUS is a valuable method with high accuracy rates in determining the degree of invasion of the tumor and determining the lymph node involvement, which is the most crucial factor determining the treatment modality in rectum tumors. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T08:29:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-5e1ca162f6424035befcd75b913f1812 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2587-0351 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T08:29:43Z |
publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
publisher | Van Yuzuncu Yil University, School of Medicine |
record_format | Article |
series | Van Tıp Dergisi |
spelling | doaj.art-5e1ca162f6424035befcd75b913f18122023-12-02T20:22:26ZengVan Yuzuncu Yil University, School of MedicineVan Tıp Dergisi2587-03512022-04-0129214915410.5505/vtd.2022.03083VTD-03083Comparison of the Pathological Findings by Endorectal Ultrasonography in Pre-operative Staging of Rectum CancerMuharrem Oner0Nadir Adnan Hacım1Division of Surgical Oncology Department, Al-Zahra Hospital, DubaiBagcilar Training and Research Hospital, General Surgery Department, Istanbul, TurkeyINTRODUCTION: Preoperative staging of rectum cancer is of great importance as it is decisive in choosing one of the many treatment options available today. Endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) may demonstrate the stage of rectal cancer, invasion of the tumor through the rectal wall and mesorectum, and the lymph node involvement. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of ERUS in rectal cancer staging according to pathology results. METHODS: In this study, the impact of preoperative staging with ERUS was investigated retrospectively in 40 patients with rectal tumors and compared with the final histopathological diagnosis based on the TNM staging. RESULTS: In our 3-year follow-up of patients, a comparison of ERUS outcomes with the final pathological diagnosis revealed that the correct stage was reached in 27 of 40 cases. The accuracy rate of ERUS in the differential diagnosis was 67.5%, and it was found to be significantly different from the pathological diagnoses. The total accuracy rate of ERUS in differential diagnosis of lymph node metastasis was found to be 61.5%, but there was no significant difference compared to pathological diagnoses. The sensitivity of ERUS was 71%, and specificity was 50%, but no significant difference was found compared to pathological diagnoses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: ERUS is a valuable method with high accuracy rates in determining the degree of invasion of the tumor and determining the lymph node involvement, which is the most crucial factor determining the treatment modality in rectum tumors.https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=vtd&un=VTD-03083rectal cancerdiagnostic imagingtumor staging |
spellingShingle | Muharrem Oner Nadir Adnan Hacım Comparison of the Pathological Findings by Endorectal Ultrasonography in Pre-operative Staging of Rectum Cancer Van Tıp Dergisi rectal cancer diagnostic imaging tumor staging |
title | Comparison of the Pathological Findings by Endorectal Ultrasonography in Pre-operative Staging of Rectum Cancer |
title_full | Comparison of the Pathological Findings by Endorectal Ultrasonography in Pre-operative Staging of Rectum Cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Pathological Findings by Endorectal Ultrasonography in Pre-operative Staging of Rectum Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Pathological Findings by Endorectal Ultrasonography in Pre-operative Staging of Rectum Cancer |
title_short | Comparison of the Pathological Findings by Endorectal Ultrasonography in Pre-operative Staging of Rectum Cancer |
title_sort | comparison of the pathological findings by endorectal ultrasonography in pre operative staging of rectum cancer |
topic | rectal cancer diagnostic imaging tumor staging |
url | https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=vtd&un=VTD-03083 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muharremoner comparisonofthepathologicalfindingsbyendorectalultrasonographyinpreoperativestagingofrectumcancer AT nadiradnanhacım comparisonofthepathologicalfindingsbyendorectalultrasonographyinpreoperativestagingofrectumcancer |