The 27 February 2022 Lop Nor Earthquake: Detectability, Location, and Discrimination

A seismic event with mb 4.8 (Mw 4.2) was detected close to the Chinese Lop Nor nuclear test site on 27 February 2022. Waveforms recorded at regional and far regional distances in central Asia indicate greater likeness with previous earthquakes in the region than with historical nuclear tests. We inv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven J. Gibbons, Esteban J. Chaves, Mark Fisk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Seismological Society of America 2022-06-01
Series:The Seismic Record
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1785/0320220018
_version_ 1797347614712135680
author Steven J. Gibbons
Esteban J. Chaves
Mark Fisk
author_facet Steven J. Gibbons
Esteban J. Chaves
Mark Fisk
author_sort Steven J. Gibbons
collection DOAJ
description A seismic event with mb 4.8 (Mw 4.2) was detected close to the Chinese Lop Nor nuclear test site on 27 February 2022. Waveforms recorded at regional and far regional distances in central Asia indicate greater likeness with previous earthquakes in the region than with historical nuclear tests. We investigate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at regional and global stations, and find the best signals in central Asia and Alaska. Lower SNR at stations in China, Europe, and Australia is likely related to the radiation pattern. A joint probabilistic location of the 2022 event and well-constrained historical nuclear tests indicates an epicenter near 41.88° N and 88.10° E, about 25 km northwest of the tunnel portion of the test site. A moment tensor inversion using high-quality regional signals indicates a nearly deviatoric source with a 72% double couple and a reverse fault mechanism. The centroid depth is 20–25 km, consistent with depth phases recorded in Alaska. The observed faulting geometry and source composition for the 2022 Lop Nor event is consistent with previous earthquakes in the region and the spatial alignment of local geomorphological features, indicating tectonic and not anthropogenic origin.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:50:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5e1e35fb37144ae1a2a6276b9cb72a6a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2694-4006
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:50:20Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Seismological Society of America
record_format Article
series The Seismic Record
spelling doaj.art-5e1e35fb37144ae1a2a6276b9cb72a6a2024-01-24T13:27:04ZengSeismological Society of AmericaThe Seismic Record2694-40062022-06-012213714710.1785/032022001822018The 27 February 2022 Lop Nor Earthquake: Detectability, Location, and DiscriminationSteven J. Gibbons0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7822-0244Esteban J. Chaves1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5724-1513Mark Fisk2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1149-3854Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, NorwayVolcanological and Seismological Observatory of Costa Rica, Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa RicaLeidos Dynetics-Linc, Applied Science Division, Arlington, Virginia, U.S.A.A seismic event with mb 4.8 (Mw 4.2) was detected close to the Chinese Lop Nor nuclear test site on 27 February 2022. Waveforms recorded at regional and far regional distances in central Asia indicate greater likeness with previous earthquakes in the region than with historical nuclear tests. We investigate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at regional and global stations, and find the best signals in central Asia and Alaska. Lower SNR at stations in China, Europe, and Australia is likely related to the radiation pattern. A joint probabilistic location of the 2022 event and well-constrained historical nuclear tests indicates an epicenter near 41.88° N and 88.10° E, about 25 km northwest of the tunnel portion of the test site. A moment tensor inversion using high-quality regional signals indicates a nearly deviatoric source with a 72% double couple and a reverse fault mechanism. The centroid depth is 20–25 km, consistent with depth phases recorded in Alaska. The observed faulting geometry and source composition for the 2022 Lop Nor event is consistent with previous earthquakes in the region and the spatial alignment of local geomorphological features, indicating tectonic and not anthropogenic origin.https://doi.org/10.1785/0320220018
spellingShingle Steven J. Gibbons
Esteban J. Chaves
Mark Fisk
The 27 February 2022 Lop Nor Earthquake: Detectability, Location, and Discrimination
The Seismic Record
title The 27 February 2022 Lop Nor Earthquake: Detectability, Location, and Discrimination
title_full The 27 February 2022 Lop Nor Earthquake: Detectability, Location, and Discrimination
title_fullStr The 27 February 2022 Lop Nor Earthquake: Detectability, Location, and Discrimination
title_full_unstemmed The 27 February 2022 Lop Nor Earthquake: Detectability, Location, and Discrimination
title_short The 27 February 2022 Lop Nor Earthquake: Detectability, Location, and Discrimination
title_sort 27 february 2022 lop nor earthquake detectability location and discrimination
url https://doi.org/10.1785/0320220018
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenjgibbons the27february2022lopnorearthquakedetectabilitylocationanddiscrimination
AT estebanjchaves the27february2022lopnorearthquakedetectabilitylocationanddiscrimination
AT markfisk the27february2022lopnorearthquakedetectabilitylocationanddiscrimination
AT stevenjgibbons 27february2022lopnorearthquakedetectabilitylocationanddiscrimination
AT estebanjchaves 27february2022lopnorearthquakedetectabilitylocationanddiscrimination
AT markfisk 27february2022lopnorearthquakedetectabilitylocationanddiscrimination