Last Mile Logistics Life Cycle Assessment: A Comparative Analysis from Diesel Van to E-Cargo Bike

With the proliferation of e-commerce, the field of last-mile logistics has grown increasingly, highlighting the need to manage the environmental consequences of this phenomenon, especially to achieve decarbonization targets for cities and to improve citizens’ quality of life. Within this framework,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Temporelli, Paola Cristina Brambilla, Elisabetta Brivio, Pierpaolo Girardi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7817
_version_ 1797473506352431104
author Andrea Temporelli
Paola Cristina Brambilla
Elisabetta Brivio
Pierpaolo Girardi
author_facet Andrea Temporelli
Paola Cristina Brambilla
Elisabetta Brivio
Pierpaolo Girardi
author_sort Andrea Temporelli
collection DOAJ
description With the proliferation of e-commerce, the field of last-mile logistics has grown increasingly, highlighting the need to manage the environmental consequences of this phenomenon, especially to achieve decarbonization targets for cities and to improve citizens’ quality of life. Within this framework, the authors carried out a last-mile logistics life cycle assessment, to analyse and compare different logistics vehicle options performing the same service in an urban context: an electric four-wheel cargo bike, an electric van, a plug-in hybrid van, and a diesel van. The assessment shows that the e-cargo bike performs better for all the impact categories considered. The second-best option is the e-van, while the diesel van shows the worst environmental results. Focusing on decarbonization, the replacement of a diesel van with an electric one or with an e-cargo bike allows a reduction of 173 g CO<sub>2</sub> eq/km and 250 g CO<sub>2</sub> eq/km, respectively. Similar results are obtained for Photochemical Ozone Formation with associated emissions of 0.18, 0.31, 0.45 and 0.49 g NMVOC eq/km for the e-cargo bike, e-van, plug in hybrid van and diesel van, respectively. The only exceptions are Human Health impact categories, Acidification and Respiratory inorganics, for which the plug-in hybrid van performs worst, and Resource use, Mineral and Metals, for which the electric van performs worst.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T20:15:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5e319b9cdb6643899888edfd91980d24
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T20:15:27Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-5e319b9cdb6643899888edfd91980d242023-11-24T00:01:34ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732022-10-011520781710.3390/en15207817Last Mile Logistics Life Cycle Assessment: A Comparative Analysis from Diesel Van to E-Cargo BikeAndrea Temporelli0Paola Cristina Brambilla1Elisabetta Brivio2Pierpaolo Girardi3Ricerca Sistema Energetico—RSE Spa, Via R. Rubattino 54, 20134 Milan, ItalyRicerca Sistema Energetico—RSE Spa, Via R. Rubattino 54, 20134 Milan, ItalyRicerca Sistema Energetico—RSE Spa, Via R. Rubattino 54, 20134 Milan, ItalyRicerca Sistema Energetico—RSE Spa, Via R. Rubattino 54, 20134 Milan, ItalyWith the proliferation of e-commerce, the field of last-mile logistics has grown increasingly, highlighting the need to manage the environmental consequences of this phenomenon, especially to achieve decarbonization targets for cities and to improve citizens’ quality of life. Within this framework, the authors carried out a last-mile logistics life cycle assessment, to analyse and compare different logistics vehicle options performing the same service in an urban context: an electric four-wheel cargo bike, an electric van, a plug-in hybrid van, and a diesel van. The assessment shows that the e-cargo bike performs better for all the impact categories considered. The second-best option is the e-van, while the diesel van shows the worst environmental results. Focusing on decarbonization, the replacement of a diesel van with an electric one or with an e-cargo bike allows a reduction of 173 g CO<sub>2</sub> eq/km and 250 g CO<sub>2</sub> eq/km, respectively. Similar results are obtained for Photochemical Ozone Formation with associated emissions of 0.18, 0.31, 0.45 and 0.49 g NMVOC eq/km for the e-cargo bike, e-van, plug in hybrid van and diesel van, respectively. The only exceptions are Human Health impact categories, Acidification and Respiratory inorganics, for which the plug-in hybrid van performs worst, and Resource use, Mineral and Metals, for which the electric van performs worst.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7817e-logisticse-cargo bikelast mile logisticsurban logisticslife cycle assessmentenvironmental impacts
spellingShingle Andrea Temporelli
Paola Cristina Brambilla
Elisabetta Brivio
Pierpaolo Girardi
Last Mile Logistics Life Cycle Assessment: A Comparative Analysis from Diesel Van to E-Cargo Bike
Energies
e-logistics
e-cargo bike
last mile logistics
urban logistics
life cycle assessment
environmental impacts
title Last Mile Logistics Life Cycle Assessment: A Comparative Analysis from Diesel Van to E-Cargo Bike
title_full Last Mile Logistics Life Cycle Assessment: A Comparative Analysis from Diesel Van to E-Cargo Bike
title_fullStr Last Mile Logistics Life Cycle Assessment: A Comparative Analysis from Diesel Van to E-Cargo Bike
title_full_unstemmed Last Mile Logistics Life Cycle Assessment: A Comparative Analysis from Diesel Van to E-Cargo Bike
title_short Last Mile Logistics Life Cycle Assessment: A Comparative Analysis from Diesel Van to E-Cargo Bike
title_sort last mile logistics life cycle assessment a comparative analysis from diesel van to e cargo bike
topic e-logistics
e-cargo bike
last mile logistics
urban logistics
life cycle assessment
environmental impacts
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7817
work_keys_str_mv AT andreatemporelli lastmilelogisticslifecycleassessmentacomparativeanalysisfromdieselvantoecargobike
AT paolacristinabrambilla lastmilelogisticslifecycleassessmentacomparativeanalysisfromdieselvantoecargobike
AT elisabettabrivio lastmilelogisticslifecycleassessmentacomparativeanalysisfromdieselvantoecargobike
AT pierpaologirardi lastmilelogisticslifecycleassessmentacomparativeanalysisfromdieselvantoecargobike