O’Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusions

Abstract In this comment, we summarize several scientific concerns with the recently published systematic review from O’Connor and colleagues that examined the relationship between proximity to animal-feeding operations and health of individuals in nearby communities. The authors utilized a bias too...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keeve E. Nachman, Juleen Lam, Leah H. Schinasi, Tara C. Smith, Beth J. Feingold, Joan A. Casey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-08-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0575-7
_version_ 1819063337554542592
author Keeve E. Nachman
Juleen Lam
Leah H. Schinasi
Tara C. Smith
Beth J. Feingold
Joan A. Casey
author_facet Keeve E. Nachman
Juleen Lam
Leah H. Schinasi
Tara C. Smith
Beth J. Feingold
Joan A. Casey
author_sort Keeve E. Nachman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In this comment, we summarize several scientific concerns with the recently published systematic review from O’Connor and colleagues that examined the relationship between proximity to animal-feeding operations and health of individuals in nearby communities. The authors utilized a bias tool not designed for environmental health research, erroneously excluded important studies, and incorrectly interpreted others. As a result, the conclusions drawn in the review misrepresent the evidence from the published literature, limiting its value to policymakers, researchers, and the public.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T15:13:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5e3712ed1d624e8fbdb45a4c25395cdc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-4053
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T15:13:04Z
publishDate 2017-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj.art-5e3712ed1d624e8fbdb45a4c25395cdc2022-12-21T18:59:13ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532017-08-01611410.1186/s13643-017-0575-7O’Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusionsKeeve E. Nachman0Juleen Lam1Leah H. Schinasi2Tara C. Smith3Beth J. Feingold4Joan A. Casey5Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins UniversityProgram on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of OB/GYN & RS, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public HealthDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany School of Public Health, State University of New YorkSchool of Public Health, University of CaliforniaAbstract In this comment, we summarize several scientific concerns with the recently published systematic review from O’Connor and colleagues that examined the relationship between proximity to animal-feeding operations and health of individuals in nearby communities. The authors utilized a bias tool not designed for environmental health research, erroneously excluded important studies, and incorrectly interpreted others. As a result, the conclusions drawn in the review misrepresent the evidence from the published literature, limiting its value to policymakers, researchers, and the public.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0575-7
spellingShingle Keeve E. Nachman
Juleen Lam
Leah H. Schinasi
Tara C. Smith
Beth J. Feingold
Joan A. Casey
O’Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusions
Systematic Reviews
title O’Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusions
title_full O’Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusions
title_fullStr O’Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusions
title_full_unstemmed O’Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusions
title_short O’Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusions
title_sort o connor et al systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health critical flaws may compromise conclusions
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0575-7
work_keys_str_mv AT keeveenachman oconnoretalsystematicreviewregardinganimalfeedingoperationsandpublichealthcriticalflawsmaycompromiseconclusions
AT juleenlam oconnoretalsystematicreviewregardinganimalfeedingoperationsandpublichealthcriticalflawsmaycompromiseconclusions
AT leahhschinasi oconnoretalsystematicreviewregardinganimalfeedingoperationsandpublichealthcriticalflawsmaycompromiseconclusions
AT taracsmith oconnoretalsystematicreviewregardinganimalfeedingoperationsandpublichealthcriticalflawsmaycompromiseconclusions
AT bethjfeingold oconnoretalsystematicreviewregardinganimalfeedingoperationsandpublichealthcriticalflawsmaycompromiseconclusions
AT joanacasey oconnoretalsystematicreviewregardinganimalfeedingoperationsandpublichealthcriticalflawsmaycompromiseconclusions