“Subjective” and “objective’ insincerity in sociological surveys: Nonverbal manifestations

Insincerity of respondents in sociological research is a challenge affecting both quality of the sociological tool and the quality of the data obtained, especially features of the psychological interaction. Insincerity is information which respondents distort intentionally. However, there are two ty...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zh V Puzanova, T I Larina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2016-12-01
Series:RUDN journal of Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/14817
_version_ 1811233786908639232
author Zh V Puzanova
T I Larina
author_facet Zh V Puzanova
T I Larina
author_sort Zh V Puzanova
collection DOAJ
description Insincerity of respondents in sociological research is a challenge affecting both quality of the sociological tool and the quality of the data obtained, especially features of the psychological interaction. Insincerity is information which respondents distort intentionally. However, there are two types of such insincerity - ‘objective’, i.e. a protective strategy used to deliberately hide some information, and ‘subjective’, when a respondent is forced to provide irrelevant information due to misunderstanding the question or incompetence. Nonverbal manifestations inform of thoughts and sometimes motives of respondents’ answers. In the example given in the article the ‘objective’ insincerity prevails due to the sensitive topic, while in other types of similar surveys the ‘subjective’ insincerity usually takes place too. Insincerity is not an emotion, rather a complex of cognitive attitudes and processes in a form of respond to a stimuli, but insincerity is accompanied by emotions which are the main differentiating signs of types of insincerity. Using the technology for the analysis of respondents’ nonverbal reactions in sociological research, we can identify the type of insincerity. The authors provide examples of certain emotions as reactions to specific provocative questions under the experiment and make a conclusion about the possibilities to identify not only incorrect or ‘threatening’ questions, but also the types of insincerity when answering such questions.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:26:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5e378c89fcfe43899e25e79ebb59696d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2313-2272
2408-8897
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:26:28Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
record_format Article
series RUDN journal of Sociology
spelling doaj.art-5e378c89fcfe43899e25e79ebb59696d2022-12-22T03:35:13ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN journal of Sociology2313-22722408-88972016-12-0116485986914496“Subjective” and “objective’ insincerity in sociological surveys: Nonverbal manifestationsZh V Puzanova0T I Larina1<p>Российский университет дружбы народов</p><p>Российский университет дружбы народов</p>Insincerity of respondents in sociological research is a challenge affecting both quality of the sociological tool and the quality of the data obtained, especially features of the psychological interaction. Insincerity is information which respondents distort intentionally. However, there are two types of such insincerity - ‘objective’, i.e. a protective strategy used to deliberately hide some information, and ‘subjective’, when a respondent is forced to provide irrelevant information due to misunderstanding the question or incompetence. Nonverbal manifestations inform of thoughts and sometimes motives of respondents’ answers. In the example given in the article the ‘objective’ insincerity prevails due to the sensitive topic, while in other types of similar surveys the ‘subjective’ insincerity usually takes place too. Insincerity is not an emotion, rather a complex of cognitive attitudes and processes in a form of respond to a stimuli, but insincerity is accompanied by emotions which are the main differentiating signs of types of insincerity. Using the technology for the analysis of respondents’ nonverbal reactions in sociological research, we can identify the type of insincerity. The authors provide examples of certain emotions as reactions to specific provocative questions under the experiment and make a conclusion about the possibilities to identify not only incorrect or ‘threatening’ questions, but also the types of insincerity when answering such questions.http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/14817«субъективная» неискренность«объективная» неискренностьневербальные проявлениясоциологические опросысомнениенерешительностьраздражениестресс
spellingShingle Zh V Puzanova
T I Larina
“Subjective” and “objective’ insincerity in sociological surveys: Nonverbal manifestations
RUDN journal of Sociology
«субъективная» неискренность
«объективная» неискренность
невербальные проявления
социологические опросы
сомнение
нерешительность
раздражение
стресс
title “Subjective” and “objective’ insincerity in sociological surveys: Nonverbal manifestations
title_full “Subjective” and “objective’ insincerity in sociological surveys: Nonverbal manifestations
title_fullStr “Subjective” and “objective’ insincerity in sociological surveys: Nonverbal manifestations
title_full_unstemmed “Subjective” and “objective’ insincerity in sociological surveys: Nonverbal manifestations
title_short “Subjective” and “objective’ insincerity in sociological surveys: Nonverbal manifestations
title_sort subjective and objective insincerity in sociological surveys nonverbal manifestations
topic «субъективная» неискренность
«объективная» неискренность
невербальные проявления
социологические опросы
сомнение
нерешительность
раздражение
стресс
url http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/14817
work_keys_str_mv AT zhvpuzanova subjectiveandobjectiveinsincerityinsociologicalsurveysnonverbalmanifestations
AT tilarina subjectiveandobjectiveinsincerityinsociologicalsurveysnonverbalmanifestations