Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology

Research suggests that feedback in Emergency Medical Services (EMS) positively affects quality of care and professional development. However, the mechanisms by which feedback achieves its effects still need to be better understood across healthcare settings. This study aimed to understand how United...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caitlin Wilson, Gillian Janes, Rebecca Lawton, Jonathan Benn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/16/2229
_version_ 1797584626873532416
author Caitlin Wilson
Gillian Janes
Rebecca Lawton
Jonathan Benn
author_facet Caitlin Wilson
Gillian Janes
Rebecca Lawton
Jonathan Benn
author_sort Caitlin Wilson
collection DOAJ
description Research suggests that feedback in Emergency Medical Services (EMS) positively affects quality of care and professional development. However, the mechanisms by which feedback achieves its effects still need to be better understood across healthcare settings. This study aimed to understand how United Kingdom (UK) ambulance services provide feedback for EMS professionals and develop a programme theory of how feedback works within EMS, using a mixed-methods, realist evaluation framework. A national cross-sectional survey was conducted to identify feedback initiatives in UK ambulance services, followed by four in-depth case studies involving qualitative interviews and documentary analysis. We used qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics to analyse survey responses from 40 prehospital feedback initiatives, alongside retroductive analysis of 17 interviews and six documents from case study sites. Feedback initiatives mainly provided individual patient outcome feedback through “<i>pull</i>” initiatives triggered by staff requests. Challenges related to information governance were identified. Our programme theory of feedback to EMS professionals encompassed context (healthcare professional and organisational characteristics), mechanisms (feedback and implementation characteristics, psychological reasoning) and outcomes (implementation, staff and service outcomes). This study suggests that most UK ambulance services use a range of feedback initiatives and provides 24 empirically based testable hypotheses for future research.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T23:54:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5e4cf207ba0b45de94dcf463c86b6acc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9032
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T23:54:19Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Healthcare
spelling doaj.art-5e4cf207ba0b45de94dcf463c86b6acc2023-11-19T01:17:37ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322023-08-011116222910.3390/healthcare11162229Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation MethodologyCaitlin Wilson0Gillian Janes1Rebecca Lawton2Jonathan Benn3School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKFaculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UKSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKResearch suggests that feedback in Emergency Medical Services (EMS) positively affects quality of care and professional development. However, the mechanisms by which feedback achieves its effects still need to be better understood across healthcare settings. This study aimed to understand how United Kingdom (UK) ambulance services provide feedback for EMS professionals and develop a programme theory of how feedback works within EMS, using a mixed-methods, realist evaluation framework. A national cross-sectional survey was conducted to identify feedback initiatives in UK ambulance services, followed by four in-depth case studies involving qualitative interviews and documentary analysis. We used qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics to analyse survey responses from 40 prehospital feedback initiatives, alongside retroductive analysis of 17 interviews and six documents from case study sites. Feedback initiatives mainly provided individual patient outcome feedback through “<i>pull</i>” initiatives triggered by staff requests. Challenges related to information governance were identified. Our programme theory of feedback to EMS professionals encompassed context (healthcare professional and organisational characteristics), mechanisms (feedback and implementation characteristics, psychological reasoning) and outcomes (implementation, staff and service outcomes). This study suggests that most UK ambulance services use a range of feedback initiatives and provides 24 empirically based testable hypotheses for future research.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/16/2229ambulancesEmergency Medical Servicesfeedbackhealth services evaluationorganizational case studies
spellingShingle Caitlin Wilson
Gillian Janes
Rebecca Lawton
Jonathan Benn
Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology
Healthcare
ambulances
Emergency Medical Services
feedback
health services evaluation
organizational case studies
title Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology
title_full Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology
title_fullStr Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology
title_full_unstemmed Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology
title_short Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology
title_sort feedback for emergency ambulance staff a national review of current practice informed by realist evaluation methodology
topic ambulances
Emergency Medical Services
feedback
health services evaluation
organizational case studies
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/16/2229
work_keys_str_mv AT caitlinwilson feedbackforemergencyambulancestaffanationalreviewofcurrentpracticeinformedbyrealistevaluationmethodology
AT gillianjanes feedbackforemergencyambulancestaffanationalreviewofcurrentpracticeinformedbyrealistevaluationmethodology
AT rebeccalawton feedbackforemergencyambulancestaffanationalreviewofcurrentpracticeinformedbyrealistevaluationmethodology
AT jonathanbenn feedbackforemergencyambulancestaffanationalreviewofcurrentpracticeinformedbyrealistevaluationmethodology