Spatializing Emotions Besides Magnitudes: Is There a Left-to-Right Valence or Intensity Mapping?

The Spatial–Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC), namely the automatic association between smaller numbers and left space and between larger numbers and right space, is often attributed to a Mental Number Line (MNL), in which magnitudes would be placed left-to-right. Previous studies have...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Giulia Prete
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Symmetry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/5/775
_version_ 1797568606112841728
author Giulia Prete
author_facet Giulia Prete
author_sort Giulia Prete
collection DOAJ
description The Spatial–Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC), namely the automatic association between smaller numbers and left space and between larger numbers and right space, is often attributed to a Mental Number Line (MNL), in which magnitudes would be placed left-to-right. Previous studies have suggested that the MNL could be extended to emotional processing. In this study, participants were asked to carry out a parity judgment task (categorizing one to five digits as even or odd) and an emotional judgment task, in which emotional smilies were presented with four emotional expressions (very sad, sad, happy, very happy). Half of the sample was asked to categorize the emotional valence (positive or negative valence), the other half was asked to categorize the emotional intensity (lower or higher intensity). The results of the parity judgment task confirmed the expected SNARC effect. In the emotional judgment task, the performance of both subgroups was better for happy than for sad expressions. Importantly, a better performance was found only in the valence task for lower intensity stimuli categorized with the left hand and for higher intensity stimuli categorized with the right hand, but only for happy smilies. The present results show that neither emotional valence nor emotional intensity alone are spatialized left-to-right, suggesting that magnitudes and emotions are processed independently from one another, and that the mental representation of emotions could be more complex than the bi-dimentional left-to-right spatialization found for numbers.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:59:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5e5c532bfd61451cb7f7be8fee943969
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-8994
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:59:20Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Symmetry
spelling doaj.art-5e5c532bfd61451cb7f7be8fee9439692023-11-19T23:43:14ZengMDPI AGSymmetry2073-89942020-05-0112577510.3390/sym12050775Spatializing Emotions Besides Magnitudes: Is There a Left-to-Right Valence or Intensity Mapping?Giulia Prete0Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 29, I-66013 Chieti, ItalyThe Spatial–Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC), namely the automatic association between smaller numbers and left space and between larger numbers and right space, is often attributed to a Mental Number Line (MNL), in which magnitudes would be placed left-to-right. Previous studies have suggested that the MNL could be extended to emotional processing. In this study, participants were asked to carry out a parity judgment task (categorizing one to five digits as even or odd) and an emotional judgment task, in which emotional smilies were presented with four emotional expressions (very sad, sad, happy, very happy). Half of the sample was asked to categorize the emotional valence (positive or negative valence), the other half was asked to categorize the emotional intensity (lower or higher intensity). The results of the parity judgment task confirmed the expected SNARC effect. In the emotional judgment task, the performance of both subgroups was better for happy than for sad expressions. Importantly, a better performance was found only in the valence task for lower intensity stimuli categorized with the left hand and for higher intensity stimuli categorized with the right hand, but only for happy smilies. The present results show that neither emotional valence nor emotional intensity alone are spatialized left-to-right, suggesting that magnitudes and emotions are processed independently from one another, and that the mental representation of emotions could be more complex than the bi-dimentional left-to-right spatialization found for numbers.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/5/775spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC)emotionshemispheric asymmetryemotional valenceemotional intensitymental number line (MNL)
spellingShingle Giulia Prete
Spatializing Emotions Besides Magnitudes: Is There a Left-to-Right Valence or Intensity Mapping?
Symmetry
spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC)
emotions
hemispheric asymmetry
emotional valence
emotional intensity
mental number line (MNL)
title Spatializing Emotions Besides Magnitudes: Is There a Left-to-Right Valence or Intensity Mapping?
title_full Spatializing Emotions Besides Magnitudes: Is There a Left-to-Right Valence or Intensity Mapping?
title_fullStr Spatializing Emotions Besides Magnitudes: Is There a Left-to-Right Valence or Intensity Mapping?
title_full_unstemmed Spatializing Emotions Besides Magnitudes: Is There a Left-to-Right Valence or Intensity Mapping?
title_short Spatializing Emotions Besides Magnitudes: Is There a Left-to-Right Valence or Intensity Mapping?
title_sort spatializing emotions besides magnitudes is there a left to right valence or intensity mapping
topic spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC)
emotions
hemispheric asymmetry
emotional valence
emotional intensity
mental number line (MNL)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/5/775
work_keys_str_mv AT giuliaprete spatializingemotionsbesidesmagnitudesistherealefttorightvalenceorintensitymapping