An Magnetic Resonance Imaging–directed Targeted-plus-perilesional Biopsy Approach for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: “Less Is More”

Background: Considering that most men benefit diagnostically from increased sampling of index lesions, limiting systematic biopsy (SBx) to the region around the index lesion could potentially minimize overdetection while maintaining the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Ob...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marinus J. Hagens, M. Arjen Noordzij, Jan Willem Mazel, Auke Jager, Thierry N. Boellaard, Jeroen A.W. Tielbeek, Margot Henebiens, Ivo G. Schoots, Pim J. van Leeuwen, Henk G. van der Poel, Sybren P. Rynja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-09-01
Series:European Urology Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168322007376
_version_ 1818496956977119232
author Marinus J. Hagens
M. Arjen Noordzij
Jan Willem Mazel
Auke Jager
Thierry N. Boellaard
Jeroen A.W. Tielbeek
Margot Henebiens
Ivo G. Schoots
Pim J. van Leeuwen
Henk G. van der Poel
Sybren P. Rynja
author_facet Marinus J. Hagens
M. Arjen Noordzij
Jan Willem Mazel
Auke Jager
Thierry N. Boellaard
Jeroen A.W. Tielbeek
Margot Henebiens
Ivo G. Schoots
Pim J. van Leeuwen
Henk G. van der Poel
Sybren P. Rynja
author_sort Marinus J. Hagens
collection DOAJ
description Background: Considering that most men benefit diagnostically from increased sampling of index lesions, limiting systematic biopsy (SBx) to the region around the index lesion could potentially minimize overdetection while maintaining the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a hypothetical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-directed targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach. Design, setting, and participants: This single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively generated data included all biopsy-naïve men with unilateral MRI-positive lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category ≥3), undergoing both MRI-directed targeted biopsies and SBx. Grade group 2–5 cancers were considered csPCa. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The diagnostic performance of a targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach was compared with that of a targeted-plus-systematic biopsy approach. The primary outcome was the detection of csPCa. Secondary outcomes included the detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (ciPCa) and the number of total biopsy cores. Results and limitations: A total of 235 men were included in the analysis; csPCa and ciPCa were detected, respectively, in 95 (40.4%) and 86 (36.6%) of these 235 men. A targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach would have detected 92/95 (96.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 91.0–99.3%) csPCa cases. At the same time, detection of systematically found ciPCa would be reduced by 11/86 (12.8%; 95% CI 6.6–21.7%). If a targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach would have been performed, the number of biopsy cores per patient would have been reduced significantly (a mean difference of 5.2; 95% CI 4.9–5.6, p < 0.001). Conclusions: An MRI-directed targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach detected almost all csPCa cases, while limiting overdiagnosis and reducing the number of biopsy cores. Prospective clinical trials are needed to substantiate the withholding of nonperilesional SBx in men with unilateral lesion(s) on MRI. Patient summary: Limiting systematic biopsies to the proximity of the suspicious area on magnetic resonance imaging helps detect an equivalent number of aggressive cancers and fewer indolent cancers. These findings may help patients and physicians choose the best biopsy approach.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T18:39:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5e5c60038657464e85253be1f3d30026
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-1683
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T18:39:07Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series European Urology Open Science
spelling doaj.art-5e5c60038657464e85253be1f3d300262022-12-22T01:37:43ZengElsevierEuropean Urology Open Science2666-16832022-09-01436873An Magnetic Resonance Imaging–directed Targeted-plus-perilesional Biopsy Approach for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: “Less Is More”Marinus J. Hagens0M. Arjen Noordzij1Jan Willem Mazel2Auke Jager3Thierry N. Boellaard4Jeroen A.W. Tielbeek5Margot Henebiens6Ivo G. Schoots7Pim J. van Leeuwen8Henk G. van der Poel9Sybren P. Rynja10Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Corresponding author. Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel. +31 205 128 272.Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The NetherlandsProstate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The NetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsProstate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The NetherlandsBackground: Considering that most men benefit diagnostically from increased sampling of index lesions, limiting systematic biopsy (SBx) to the region around the index lesion could potentially minimize overdetection while maintaining the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a hypothetical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-directed targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach. Design, setting, and participants: This single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively generated data included all biopsy-naïve men with unilateral MRI-positive lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category ≥3), undergoing both MRI-directed targeted biopsies and SBx. Grade group 2–5 cancers were considered csPCa. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The diagnostic performance of a targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach was compared with that of a targeted-plus-systematic biopsy approach. The primary outcome was the detection of csPCa. Secondary outcomes included the detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (ciPCa) and the number of total biopsy cores. Results and limitations: A total of 235 men were included in the analysis; csPCa and ciPCa were detected, respectively, in 95 (40.4%) and 86 (36.6%) of these 235 men. A targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach would have detected 92/95 (96.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 91.0–99.3%) csPCa cases. At the same time, detection of systematically found ciPCa would be reduced by 11/86 (12.8%; 95% CI 6.6–21.7%). If a targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach would have been performed, the number of biopsy cores per patient would have been reduced significantly (a mean difference of 5.2; 95% CI 4.9–5.6, p < 0.001). Conclusions: An MRI-directed targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach detected almost all csPCa cases, while limiting overdiagnosis and reducing the number of biopsy cores. Prospective clinical trials are needed to substantiate the withholding of nonperilesional SBx in men with unilateral lesion(s) on MRI. Patient summary: Limiting systematic biopsies to the proximity of the suspicious area on magnetic resonance imaging helps detect an equivalent number of aggressive cancers and fewer indolent cancers. These findings may help patients and physicians choose the best biopsy approach.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168322007376Prostate biopsiesTransperinealCognitive fusionPerilesional systematic biopsies
spellingShingle Marinus J. Hagens
M. Arjen Noordzij
Jan Willem Mazel
Auke Jager
Thierry N. Boellaard
Jeroen A.W. Tielbeek
Margot Henebiens
Ivo G. Schoots
Pim J. van Leeuwen
Henk G. van der Poel
Sybren P. Rynja
An Magnetic Resonance Imaging–directed Targeted-plus-perilesional Biopsy Approach for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: “Less Is More”
European Urology Open Science
Prostate biopsies
Transperineal
Cognitive fusion
Perilesional systematic biopsies
title An Magnetic Resonance Imaging–directed Targeted-plus-perilesional Biopsy Approach for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: “Less Is More”
title_full An Magnetic Resonance Imaging–directed Targeted-plus-perilesional Biopsy Approach for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: “Less Is More”
title_fullStr An Magnetic Resonance Imaging–directed Targeted-plus-perilesional Biopsy Approach for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: “Less Is More”
title_full_unstemmed An Magnetic Resonance Imaging–directed Targeted-plus-perilesional Biopsy Approach for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: “Less Is More”
title_short An Magnetic Resonance Imaging–directed Targeted-plus-perilesional Biopsy Approach for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: “Less Is More”
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging directed targeted plus perilesional biopsy approach for prostate cancer diagnosis less is more
topic Prostate biopsies
Transperineal
Cognitive fusion
Perilesional systematic biopsies
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168322007376
work_keys_str_mv AT marinusjhagens anmagneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT marjennoordzij anmagneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT janwillemmazel anmagneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT aukejager anmagneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT thierrynboellaard anmagneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT jeroenawtielbeek anmagneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT margothenebiens anmagneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT ivogschoots anmagneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT pimjvanleeuwen anmagneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT henkgvanderpoel anmagneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT sybrenprynja anmagneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT marinusjhagens magneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT marjennoordzij magneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT janwillemmazel magneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT aukejager magneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT thierrynboellaard magneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT jeroenawtielbeek magneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT margothenebiens magneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT ivogschoots magneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT pimjvanleeuwen magneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT henkgvanderpoel magneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore
AT sybrenprynja magneticresonanceimagingdirectedtargetedplusperilesionalbiopsyapproachforprostatecancerdiagnosislessismore