Design impacts of citizen science. A comparative analysis of water monitoring projects
Citizen science is often promoted as having the capacity to enable change–from increasing data provision and knowledge product development, via behavioral change of citizens, to problem-solving. Likewise, researchers increasingly emphasize the role of project design in initiating these changes throu...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1186238/full |
| _version_ | 1797662054986809344 |
|---|---|
| author | Sabrina Kirschke Sabrina Kirschke Christy Bennett Armin Bigham Ghazani Dieter Kirschke Yeongju Lee Seyed Taha Loghmani Khouzani Shuvojit Nath |
| author_facet | Sabrina Kirschke Sabrina Kirschke Christy Bennett Armin Bigham Ghazani Dieter Kirschke Yeongju Lee Seyed Taha Loghmani Khouzani Shuvojit Nath |
| author_sort | Sabrina Kirschke |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Citizen science is often promoted as having the capacity to enable change–from increasing data provision and knowledge product development, via behavioral change of citizens, to problem-solving. Likewise, researchers increasingly emphasize the role of project design in initiating these changes through citizen science. However, respective claims are mostly based on single case studies and reviews, calling for a systematic comparative approach to understanding the effects of project design on change. Based on a survey of 85 water-related citizen science projects from 27 countries, we analyze the comparative effects of literature-based design principles on project impacts. Factor analysis first reveals three key impact factors which are ‘Data output’, ‘Citizen outcome’, and ‘Impact chain’. Regression analysis then shows that these impact factors are significantly influenced by several design factors, amongst which motivational factors are most prominent. The analysis also shows that design factors are most important for ‘Impact chain’, followed by ‘Citizen outcome’, and ‘Data output’. While design factors only partly explain the overall project effects, the regression results are rather stable and significant when including other potential influencing factors like project responsibility and funding. In sum, the results provide an empirically substantiated and differentiated understanding of citizen science impacts and how these are influenced by project design. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T18:54:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5e6548b9bccd44bd8831a11f543299a2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2296-665X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T18:54:34Z |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-5e6548b9bccd44bd8831a11f543299a22023-10-11T06:19:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2023-10-011110.3389/fenvs.2023.11862381186238Design impacts of citizen science. A comparative analysis of water monitoring projectsSabrina Kirschke0Sabrina Kirschke1Christy Bennett2Armin Bigham Ghazani3Dieter Kirschke4Yeongju Lee5Seyed Taha Loghmani Khouzani6Shuvojit Nath7United Nations University—Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES), Dresden, GermanyMuseum für Naturkunde—Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, GermanyTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyHumboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, GermanyUnited Nations University—Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES), Dresden, GermanyUnited Nations University—Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES), Dresden, GermanyUnited Nations University—Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES), Dresden, GermanyCitizen science is often promoted as having the capacity to enable change–from increasing data provision and knowledge product development, via behavioral change of citizens, to problem-solving. Likewise, researchers increasingly emphasize the role of project design in initiating these changes through citizen science. However, respective claims are mostly based on single case studies and reviews, calling for a systematic comparative approach to understanding the effects of project design on change. Based on a survey of 85 water-related citizen science projects from 27 countries, we analyze the comparative effects of literature-based design principles on project impacts. Factor analysis first reveals three key impact factors which are ‘Data output’, ‘Citizen outcome’, and ‘Impact chain’. Regression analysis then shows that these impact factors are significantly influenced by several design factors, amongst which motivational factors are most prominent. The analysis also shows that design factors are most important for ‘Impact chain’, followed by ‘Citizen outcome’, and ‘Data output’. While design factors only partly explain the overall project effects, the regression results are rather stable and significant when including other potential influencing factors like project responsibility and funding. In sum, the results provide an empirically substantiated and differentiated understanding of citizen science impacts and how these are influenced by project design.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1186238/fullcommunity-based monitoringfreshwaterimpact assessmentregression analysisSDG 6voluntary monitoring |
| spellingShingle | Sabrina Kirschke Sabrina Kirschke Christy Bennett Armin Bigham Ghazani Dieter Kirschke Yeongju Lee Seyed Taha Loghmani Khouzani Shuvojit Nath Design impacts of citizen science. A comparative analysis of water monitoring projects Frontiers in Environmental Science community-based monitoring freshwater impact assessment regression analysis SDG 6 voluntary monitoring |
| title | Design impacts of citizen science. A comparative analysis of water monitoring projects |
| title_full | Design impacts of citizen science. A comparative analysis of water monitoring projects |
| title_fullStr | Design impacts of citizen science. A comparative analysis of water monitoring projects |
| title_full_unstemmed | Design impacts of citizen science. A comparative analysis of water monitoring projects |
| title_short | Design impacts of citizen science. A comparative analysis of water monitoring projects |
| title_sort | design impacts of citizen science a comparative analysis of water monitoring projects |
| topic | community-based monitoring freshwater impact assessment regression analysis SDG 6 voluntary monitoring |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1186238/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sabrinakirschke designimpactsofcitizenscienceacomparativeanalysisofwatermonitoringprojects AT sabrinakirschke designimpactsofcitizenscienceacomparativeanalysisofwatermonitoringprojects AT christybennett designimpactsofcitizenscienceacomparativeanalysisofwatermonitoringprojects AT arminbighamghazani designimpactsofcitizenscienceacomparativeanalysisofwatermonitoringprojects AT dieterkirschke designimpactsofcitizenscienceacomparativeanalysisofwatermonitoringprojects AT yeongjulee designimpactsofcitizenscienceacomparativeanalysisofwatermonitoringprojects AT seyedtahaloghmanikhouzani designimpactsofcitizenscienceacomparativeanalysisofwatermonitoringprojects AT shuvojitnath designimpactsofcitizenscienceacomparativeanalysisofwatermonitoringprojects |