Automated Delineation of Microstands in Hemiboreal Mixed Forests Using Stereo GeoEye-1 Data

A microstand is a small forest area with a homogeneous tree species, height, and density composition. High-spatial-resolution GeoEye-1 multispectral (MS) images and GeoEye-1-based canopy height models (CHMs) allow delineating microstands automatically. This paper studied the potential benefits of tw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Linda Gulbe, Juris Zarins, Ints Mednieks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/6/1471
_version_ 1797442637522796544
author Linda Gulbe
Juris Zarins
Ints Mednieks
author_facet Linda Gulbe
Juris Zarins
Ints Mednieks
author_sort Linda Gulbe
collection DOAJ
description A microstand is a small forest area with a homogeneous tree species, height, and density composition. High-spatial-resolution GeoEye-1 multispectral (MS) images and GeoEye-1-based canopy height models (CHMs) allow delineating microstands automatically. This paper studied the potential benefits of two microstand segmentation workflows: (1) our modification of JSEG and (2) generic region merging (GRM) of the Orfeo Toolbox, both intended for the microstand border refinement and automated stand volume estimation in hemiboreal forests. Our modification of JSEG uses a CHM as the primary data source for segmentation by refining the results using MS data. Meanwhile, the CHM and multispectral data fusion were achieved as multiband segmentation for the GRM workflow. The accuracy was evaluated using several sets of metrics (unsupervised, supervised direct assessment, and system-level assessment). Metrics were calculated for a regular segment grid to check the benefits compared with the simple image patches. The metrics showed very similar results for both workflows. The most successful combinations in the workflow parameters retrieved over 75 % of the boundaries selected by a human interpreter. However, the impact of data fusion and parameter combinations on stand volume estimation accuracy was minimal, causing variations of the RMSE within approximately 7 m<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mn>3</mn></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>/ha.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T12:44:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5e7634223b5e46a488009d026adc4957
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T12:44:50Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-5e7634223b5e46a488009d026adc49572023-11-30T22:13:31ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922022-03-01146147110.3390/rs14061471Automated Delineation of Microstands in Hemiboreal Mixed Forests Using Stereo GeoEye-1 DataLinda Gulbe0Juris Zarins1Ints Mednieks2Institute of Electronics and Computer Science, Dzērbenes 14, LV-1006 Riga, LatviaLatvian State Forest Research Institute “Silava”, Rīgas 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, LatviaInstitute of Electronics and Computer Science, Dzērbenes 14, LV-1006 Riga, LatviaA microstand is a small forest area with a homogeneous tree species, height, and density composition. High-spatial-resolution GeoEye-1 multispectral (MS) images and GeoEye-1-based canopy height models (CHMs) allow delineating microstands automatically. This paper studied the potential benefits of two microstand segmentation workflows: (1) our modification of JSEG and (2) generic region merging (GRM) of the Orfeo Toolbox, both intended for the microstand border refinement and automated stand volume estimation in hemiboreal forests. Our modification of JSEG uses a CHM as the primary data source for segmentation by refining the results using MS data. Meanwhile, the CHM and multispectral data fusion were achieved as multiband segmentation for the GRM workflow. The accuracy was evaluated using several sets of metrics (unsupervised, supervised direct assessment, and system-level assessment). Metrics were calculated for a regular segment grid to check the benefits compared with the simple image patches. The metrics showed very similar results for both workflows. The most successful combinations in the workflow parameters retrieved over 75 % of the boundaries selected by a human interpreter. However, the impact of data fusion and parameter combinations on stand volume estimation accuracy was minimal, causing variations of the RMSE within approximately 7 m<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mn>3</mn></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>/ha.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/6/1471forest microstandssegmentationGeoEye-1 stereoJSEGgeneric region mergingdata fusion
spellingShingle Linda Gulbe
Juris Zarins
Ints Mednieks
Automated Delineation of Microstands in Hemiboreal Mixed Forests Using Stereo GeoEye-1 Data
Remote Sensing
forest microstands
segmentation
GeoEye-1 stereo
JSEG
generic region merging
data fusion
title Automated Delineation of Microstands in Hemiboreal Mixed Forests Using Stereo GeoEye-1 Data
title_full Automated Delineation of Microstands in Hemiboreal Mixed Forests Using Stereo GeoEye-1 Data
title_fullStr Automated Delineation of Microstands in Hemiboreal Mixed Forests Using Stereo GeoEye-1 Data
title_full_unstemmed Automated Delineation of Microstands in Hemiboreal Mixed Forests Using Stereo GeoEye-1 Data
title_short Automated Delineation of Microstands in Hemiboreal Mixed Forests Using Stereo GeoEye-1 Data
title_sort automated delineation of microstands in hemiboreal mixed forests using stereo geoeye 1 data
topic forest microstands
segmentation
GeoEye-1 stereo
JSEG
generic region merging
data fusion
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/6/1471
work_keys_str_mv AT lindagulbe automateddelineationofmicrostandsinhemiborealmixedforestsusingstereogeoeye1data
AT juriszarins automateddelineationofmicrostandsinhemiborealmixedforestsusingstereogeoeye1data
AT intsmednieks automateddelineationofmicrostandsinhemiborealmixedforestsusingstereogeoeye1data