Survey on the Presence of Bacterial and Parasitic Zoonotic Agents in the Feces of Wild Birds

Wild avifauna may act as fecal source of bacterial and parasitic pathogens for other birds and mammals. Most of these pathogens have a relevant impact on human and livestock health which may cause severe disease and economic loss. In the present study, the fecal samples collected from 121 wild birds...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valentina Virginia Ebani, Lisa Guardone, Fabrizio Bertelloni, Stefania Perrucci, Alessandro Poli, Francesca Mancianti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Veterinary Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/9/171
_version_ 1827681104697491456
author Valentina Virginia Ebani
Lisa Guardone
Fabrizio Bertelloni
Stefania Perrucci
Alessandro Poli
Francesca Mancianti
author_facet Valentina Virginia Ebani
Lisa Guardone
Fabrizio Bertelloni
Stefania Perrucci
Alessandro Poli
Francesca Mancianti
author_sort Valentina Virginia Ebani
collection DOAJ
description Wild avifauna may act as fecal source of bacterial and parasitic pathogens for other birds and mammals. Most of these pathogens have a relevant impact on human and livestock health which may cause severe disease and economic loss. In the present study, the fecal samples collected from 121 wild birds belonging to 15 species of the genera <i>Anas, Tadorna, Fulica, Arddea, Larus, Falco, Athene, Accipiter</i>, and <i>Columba</i> were submitted to bacteriological and molecular analyses to detect <i>Brucella</i> spp., <i>Coxiella burnetii</i>, <i>Mycobacterium</i> spp., <i>Salmonella</i> spp., <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp., <i>Giardia</i> spp., and microsporidia. Four (3.3%) animals were positive for one pathogen: one <i>Anas penelope</i> for <i>C. burnetii</i>, one <i>Larus michahellis</i> for <i>S. enterica</i> serovar Coeln, and two <i>Columba livia</i> for <i>Encephalitozoon hellem</i>. Although the prevalence rates found in the present survey were quite low, the obtained results confirm that wild birds would be the a potential fecal source of bacterial and parasitic zoonotic pathogens which sometimes can also represent a severe threat for farm animals.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T07:08:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5e7a0ea8475f4f51a426c33617fb4893
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2306-7381
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T07:08:38Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Veterinary Sciences
spelling doaj.art-5e7a0ea8475f4f51a426c33617fb48932023-11-22T15:35:40ZengMDPI AGVeterinary Sciences2306-73812021-08-018917110.3390/vetsci8090171Survey on the Presence of Bacterial and Parasitic Zoonotic Agents in the Feces of Wild BirdsValentina Virginia Ebani0Lisa Guardone1Fabrizio Bertelloni2Stefania Perrucci3Alessandro Poli4Francesca Mancianti5Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, ItalyWild avifauna may act as fecal source of bacterial and parasitic pathogens for other birds and mammals. Most of these pathogens have a relevant impact on human and livestock health which may cause severe disease and economic loss. In the present study, the fecal samples collected from 121 wild birds belonging to 15 species of the genera <i>Anas, Tadorna, Fulica, Arddea, Larus, Falco, Athene, Accipiter</i>, and <i>Columba</i> were submitted to bacteriological and molecular analyses to detect <i>Brucella</i> spp., <i>Coxiella burnetii</i>, <i>Mycobacterium</i> spp., <i>Salmonella</i> spp., <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp., <i>Giardia</i> spp., and microsporidia. Four (3.3%) animals were positive for one pathogen: one <i>Anas penelope</i> for <i>C. burnetii</i>, one <i>Larus michahellis</i> for <i>S. enterica</i> serovar Coeln, and two <i>Columba livia</i> for <i>Encephalitozoon hellem</i>. Although the prevalence rates found in the present survey were quite low, the obtained results confirm that wild birds would be the a potential fecal source of bacterial and parasitic zoonotic pathogens which sometimes can also represent a severe threat for farm animals.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/9/171wild avifaunazoonosis<i>Encephalitozoon</i><i>Salmonella</i><i>Coxiella burnetii</i>
spellingShingle Valentina Virginia Ebani
Lisa Guardone
Fabrizio Bertelloni
Stefania Perrucci
Alessandro Poli
Francesca Mancianti
Survey on the Presence of Bacterial and Parasitic Zoonotic Agents in the Feces of Wild Birds
Veterinary Sciences
wild avifauna
zoonosis
<i>Encephalitozoon</i>
<i>Salmonella</i>
<i>Coxiella burnetii</i>
title Survey on the Presence of Bacterial and Parasitic Zoonotic Agents in the Feces of Wild Birds
title_full Survey on the Presence of Bacterial and Parasitic Zoonotic Agents in the Feces of Wild Birds
title_fullStr Survey on the Presence of Bacterial and Parasitic Zoonotic Agents in the Feces of Wild Birds
title_full_unstemmed Survey on the Presence of Bacterial and Parasitic Zoonotic Agents in the Feces of Wild Birds
title_short Survey on the Presence of Bacterial and Parasitic Zoonotic Agents in the Feces of Wild Birds
title_sort survey on the presence of bacterial and parasitic zoonotic agents in the feces of wild birds
topic wild avifauna
zoonosis
<i>Encephalitozoon</i>
<i>Salmonella</i>
<i>Coxiella burnetii</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/9/171
work_keys_str_mv AT valentinavirginiaebani surveyonthepresenceofbacterialandparasiticzoonoticagentsinthefecesofwildbirds
AT lisaguardone surveyonthepresenceofbacterialandparasiticzoonoticagentsinthefecesofwildbirds
AT fabriziobertelloni surveyonthepresenceofbacterialandparasiticzoonoticagentsinthefecesofwildbirds
AT stefaniaperrucci surveyonthepresenceofbacterialandparasiticzoonoticagentsinthefecesofwildbirds
AT alessandropoli surveyonthepresenceofbacterialandparasiticzoonoticagentsinthefecesofwildbirds
AT francescamancianti surveyonthepresenceofbacterialandparasiticzoonoticagentsinthefecesofwildbirds