‘Constitutional Dialogue’: An Overview

It is clear that 'constitutional dialogue' often serves as a convenient metaphor, but how can we employ it in such a way that it advances contemporary research in public law? This article presents a structured literature review on the subject, draws out certain possible caveats and provide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Meuwese, Marnix Snel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2013-03-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.231/
_version_ 1818498012848062464
author Anne Meuwese
Marnix Snel
author_facet Anne Meuwese
Marnix Snel
author_sort Anne Meuwese
collection DOAJ
description It is clear that 'constitutional dialogue' often serves as a convenient metaphor, but how can we employ it in such a way that it advances contemporary research in public law? This article presents a structured literature review on the subject, draws out certain possible caveats and provides suggestions for how to forge ahead with developing and using the concept of 'constitutional dialogue'. We explore various theoretical approaches to 'constitutional dialogue' in relation to different institutional settings. The concept of constitutional dialogue can be applied in institutional settings beyond courts and legislatures and is increasingly being applied in such a way. As part of our exploration of the implications for legal research we propose distinguishing between the use of 'constitutional dialogue' as a 'lens' and as a 'method' and making a clear choice between empirical and normative analysis.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T18:52:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5ea317f2f62240878d712954a77342f0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1871-515X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T18:52:31Z
publishDate 2013-03-01
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
record_format Article
series Utrecht Law Review
spelling doaj.art-5ea317f2f62240878d712954a77342f02022-12-22T01:37:15ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2013-03-019212314010.18352/ulr.231222‘Constitutional Dialogue’: An OverviewAnne Meuwese0Marnix Snel1Tilburg UniversityTilburg UniversityIt is clear that 'constitutional dialogue' often serves as a convenient metaphor, but how can we employ it in such a way that it advances contemporary research in public law? This article presents a structured literature review on the subject, draws out certain possible caveats and provides suggestions for how to forge ahead with developing and using the concept of 'constitutional dialogue'. We explore various theoretical approaches to 'constitutional dialogue' in relation to different institutional settings. The concept of constitutional dialogue can be applied in institutional settings beyond courts and legislatures and is increasingly being applied in such a way. As part of our exploration of the implications for legal research we propose distinguishing between the use of 'constitutional dialogue' as a 'lens' and as a 'method' and making a clear choice between empirical and normative analysis.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.231/constitutional dialoguelegal methodologylegal theory
spellingShingle Anne Meuwese
Marnix Snel
‘Constitutional Dialogue’: An Overview
Utrecht Law Review
constitutional dialogue
legal methodology
legal theory
title ‘Constitutional Dialogue’: An Overview
title_full ‘Constitutional Dialogue’: An Overview
title_fullStr ‘Constitutional Dialogue’: An Overview
title_full_unstemmed ‘Constitutional Dialogue’: An Overview
title_short ‘Constitutional Dialogue’: An Overview
title_sort constitutional dialogue an overview
topic constitutional dialogue
legal methodology
legal theory
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.231/
work_keys_str_mv AT annemeuwese constitutionaldialogueanoverview
AT marnixsnel constitutionaldialogueanoverview