Safety and efficacy of the SeparGateTM balloon-guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SeparGate™ balloon-guiding catheter (BGC) for blocking flow and delivering devices in neurointerventional surgery. Method: This prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolled patients who received BGC adjuvant therapy to provide temporary bloo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huan Liu, Rufeng Jia, Yanyan He, Tengfei Zhou, Liangfu Zhu, Yonghong Ding, Juha Antero Hernesniemi, Tianxiao Li, Yingkun He
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2022-08-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360222000370
_version_ 1798036564856537088
author Huan Liu
Rufeng Jia
Yanyan He
Tengfei Zhou
Liangfu Zhu
Yonghong Ding
Juha Antero Hernesniemi
Tianxiao Li
Yingkun He
author_facet Huan Liu
Rufeng Jia
Yanyan He
Tengfei Zhou
Liangfu Zhu
Yonghong Ding
Juha Antero Hernesniemi
Tianxiao Li
Yingkun He
author_sort Huan Liu
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SeparGate™ balloon-guiding catheter (BGC) for blocking flow and delivering devices in neurointerventional surgery. Method: This prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolled patients who received BGC adjuvant therapy to provide temporary blood flow arrest of the supra-aortic arch arteries and their branch vessels in interventional therapy. The primary endpoint was immediate procedural success rate in flow arrest, device delivery, and withdrawal. The efficacy endpoints were intraoperative product performance, including rigidity, smoothness, fracture resistance of the catheter wall, catheter push performance, compatibility and radiopaque display, integrity, adhesion thrombus after withdrawal and balloon rupture. The safety endpoints were adverse and serious adverse events associated with the test device and serious adverse events resulting in death or serious health deterioration. Result: A total of 129 patients were included; of them, 128 were analyzed in the full analysis set (FAS) and per protocol set (PPS). Immediate procedural success was achieved in 97.7% of patients with FAS and PPS. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 94.6%, higher than the preset efficacy margin of 94%. Device-related adverse events occurred in 2 (1.6%) cases. One was mild adverse event of vasospasm, which resolved spontaneously. The other was serious adverse event of dissection aggravation, which was treated with stenting angioplasty. No device defects were observed. Conclusion: In neurointerventional surgery, the SeparGate™ BGC can be used to temporarily block the flow of the supra-aortic arch arteries and their branch vessels and guide the interventional device to the target vascular position.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:14:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5ec3218fb75b49a3be3378413178e81d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2096-3602
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:14:45Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Medicine
spelling doaj.art-5ec3218fb75b49a3be3378413178e81d2022-12-22T04:02:50ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Journal of Interventional Medicine2096-36022022-08-0153143147Safety and efficacy of the SeparGateTM balloon-guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trialHuan Liu0Rufeng Jia1Yanyan He2Tengfei Zhou3Liangfu Zhu4Yonghong Ding5Juha Antero Hernesniemi6Tianxiao Li7Yingkun He8Department of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, 450003, ChinaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, 450003, ChinaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, 450003, ChinaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, 450003, ChinaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, 450003, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA“Juha Hernesniemi” International Center for Neurosurgery, Henan Provincial People´s Hospital, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, 450003, China; Corresponding author. Department of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, No 7, Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, China.Department of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, 450003, China; Corresponding author. Department of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, No 7, Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, China.Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SeparGate™ balloon-guiding catheter (BGC) for blocking flow and delivering devices in neurointerventional surgery. Method: This prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolled patients who received BGC adjuvant therapy to provide temporary blood flow arrest of the supra-aortic arch arteries and their branch vessels in interventional therapy. The primary endpoint was immediate procedural success rate in flow arrest, device delivery, and withdrawal. The efficacy endpoints were intraoperative product performance, including rigidity, smoothness, fracture resistance of the catheter wall, catheter push performance, compatibility and radiopaque display, integrity, adhesion thrombus after withdrawal and balloon rupture. The safety endpoints were adverse and serious adverse events associated with the test device and serious adverse events resulting in death or serious health deterioration. Result: A total of 129 patients were included; of them, 128 were analyzed in the full analysis set (FAS) and per protocol set (PPS). Immediate procedural success was achieved in 97.7% of patients with FAS and PPS. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 94.6%, higher than the preset efficacy margin of 94%. Device-related adverse events occurred in 2 (1.6%) cases. One was mild adverse event of vasospasm, which resolved spontaneously. The other was serious adverse event of dissection aggravation, which was treated with stenting angioplasty. No device defects were observed. Conclusion: In neurointerventional surgery, the SeparGate™ BGC can be used to temporarily block the flow of the supra-aortic arch arteries and their branch vessels and guide the interventional device to the target vascular position.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360222000370SeparGateTM balloon guiding catheterSafety and efficacyNeurointerventional surgery
spellingShingle Huan Liu
Rufeng Jia
Yanyan He
Tengfei Zhou
Liangfu Zhu
Yonghong Ding
Juha Antero Hernesniemi
Tianxiao Li
Yingkun He
Safety and efficacy of the SeparGateTM balloon-guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial
Journal of Interventional Medicine
SeparGateTM balloon guiding catheter
Safety and efficacy
Neurointerventional surgery
title Safety and efficacy of the SeparGateTM balloon-guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial
title_full Safety and efficacy of the SeparGateTM balloon-guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of the SeparGateTM balloon-guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of the SeparGateTM balloon-guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial
title_short Safety and efficacy of the SeparGateTM balloon-guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial
title_sort safety and efficacy of the separgatetm balloon guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery a prospective multicenter single arm clinical trial
topic SeparGateTM balloon guiding catheter
Safety and efficacy
Neurointerventional surgery
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360222000370
work_keys_str_mv AT huanliu safetyandefficacyofthesepargatetmballoonguidingcatheterinneurointerventionalsurgeryaprospectivemulticentersinglearmclinicaltrial
AT rufengjia safetyandefficacyofthesepargatetmballoonguidingcatheterinneurointerventionalsurgeryaprospectivemulticentersinglearmclinicaltrial
AT yanyanhe safetyandefficacyofthesepargatetmballoonguidingcatheterinneurointerventionalsurgeryaprospectivemulticentersinglearmclinicaltrial
AT tengfeizhou safetyandefficacyofthesepargatetmballoonguidingcatheterinneurointerventionalsurgeryaprospectivemulticentersinglearmclinicaltrial
AT liangfuzhu safetyandefficacyofthesepargatetmballoonguidingcatheterinneurointerventionalsurgeryaprospectivemulticentersinglearmclinicaltrial
AT yonghongding safetyandefficacyofthesepargatetmballoonguidingcatheterinneurointerventionalsurgeryaprospectivemulticentersinglearmclinicaltrial
AT juhaanterohernesniemi safetyandefficacyofthesepargatetmballoonguidingcatheterinneurointerventionalsurgeryaprospectivemulticentersinglearmclinicaltrial
AT tianxiaoli safetyandefficacyofthesepargatetmballoonguidingcatheterinneurointerventionalsurgeryaprospectivemulticentersinglearmclinicaltrial
AT yingkunhe safetyandefficacyofthesepargatetmballoonguidingcatheterinneurointerventionalsurgeryaprospectivemulticentersinglearmclinicaltrial