A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research

Abstract Objective: Duodenoscopy-associated infections and outbreaks are reported globally despite strict adherence to duodenoscope reprocessing protocols. Therefore, new developments in the reprocessing procedure are needed. Design: We evaluated a novel dynamic flow model for an additional clea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maarten Heuvelmans, Willem Woudstra, Herman F. Wunderink, Jan F. Monkelbaan, Henny C. van der Mei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022-01-01
Series:Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2732494X22002947/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811157161174106112
author Maarten Heuvelmans
Willem Woudstra
Herman F. Wunderink
Jan F. Monkelbaan
Henny C. van der Mei
author_facet Maarten Heuvelmans
Willem Woudstra
Herman F. Wunderink
Jan F. Monkelbaan
Henny C. van der Mei
author_sort Maarten Heuvelmans
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective: Duodenoscopy-associated infections and outbreaks are reported globally despite strict adherence to duodenoscope reprocessing protocols. Therefore, new developments in the reprocessing procedure are needed. Design: We evaluated a novel dynamic flow model for an additional cleaning step between precleaning and manual cleaning in the reprocessing procedure. Methods: A parallel plate flow chamber with a fluorinated ethylene propylene bottom plate was used to mimic the duodenoscope channels. The flow chamber was inoculated with a suspension containing Klebsiella pneumoniae to simulate bacterial contamination during a duodenoscopic procedure. After inoculation the flow chamber was flushed with a detergent mimicking precleaning. Subsequently the flow chamber was subjected to different interventions: flow with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), flow with 2 commercial detergents, flow with sodium dodecyl sulfate with 3 different concentrations, and flow with microbubbles. Adhering bacteria were counted using phase-contrast microscopy throughout the experiment, and finally, bacterial viability was assessed. Results: During precleaning both PBS and 1% (v/v) Neodisher Mediclean Forte were able to desorb bacteria, but neither proved superior. After precleaning only sodium dodecyl sulfate could desorb bacteria. Conclusions: Flushing during precleaning is an essential step for reducing adhering luminal bacteria, and sodium dodecyl sulfate is a promising detergent for bacterial desorption from duodenoscope channels after precleaning.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:02:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5ec3239b98d747ddac80d1ae3b687ddf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2732-494X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:02:22Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
spelling doaj.art-5ec3239b98d747ddac80d1ae3b687ddf2023-03-09T12:28:17ZengCambridge University PressAntimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology2732-494X2022-01-01210.1017/ash.2022.294A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational researchMaarten Heuvelmans0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-7086Willem Woudstra1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7212-3443Herman F. Wunderink2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9491-0790Jan F. Monkelbaan3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9030-059XHenny C. van der Mei4Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands Abstract Objective: Duodenoscopy-associated infections and outbreaks are reported globally despite strict adherence to duodenoscope reprocessing protocols. Therefore, new developments in the reprocessing procedure are needed. Design: We evaluated a novel dynamic flow model for an additional cleaning step between precleaning and manual cleaning in the reprocessing procedure. Methods: A parallel plate flow chamber with a fluorinated ethylene propylene bottom plate was used to mimic the duodenoscope channels. The flow chamber was inoculated with a suspension containing Klebsiella pneumoniae to simulate bacterial contamination during a duodenoscopic procedure. After inoculation the flow chamber was flushed with a detergent mimicking precleaning. Subsequently the flow chamber was subjected to different interventions: flow with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), flow with 2 commercial detergents, flow with sodium dodecyl sulfate with 3 different concentrations, and flow with microbubbles. Adhering bacteria were counted using phase-contrast microscopy throughout the experiment, and finally, bacterial viability was assessed. Results: During precleaning both PBS and 1% (v/v) Neodisher Mediclean Forte were able to desorb bacteria, but neither proved superior. After precleaning only sodium dodecyl sulfate could desorb bacteria. Conclusions: Flushing during precleaning is an essential step for reducing adhering luminal bacteria, and sodium dodecyl sulfate is a promising detergent for bacterial desorption from duodenoscope channels after precleaning. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2732494X22002947/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Maarten Heuvelmans
Willem Woudstra
Herman F. Wunderink
Jan F. Monkelbaan
Henny C. van der Mei
A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
title A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
title_full A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
title_fullStr A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
title_full_unstemmed A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
title_short A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
title_sort dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2732494X22002947/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT maartenheuvelmans adynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT willemwoudstra adynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT hermanfwunderink adynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT janfmonkelbaan adynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT hennycvandermei adynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT maartenheuvelmans dynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT willemwoudstra dynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT hermanfwunderink dynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT janfmonkelbaan dynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT hennycvandermei dynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch