Forage senescence and disease influence elk pregnancy across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
Abstract For various temperate ungulate species, recent research has highlighted the potential for spring vegetation phenology (“green‐up”) to influence individual condition, with purported benefits to population productivity. However, few studies have been able to measure the benefit on vital rates...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Ecosphere |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4694 |
| _version_ | 1827397259375935488 |
|---|---|
| author | Owen R. Bidder Thomas Connor Juan M. Morales Gregory J. M. Rickbeil Jerod A. Merkle Rebecca K. Fuda Jared D. Rogerson Brandon M. Scurlock William H. Edwards Eric K. Cole Douglas E. McWhirter Alyson B. Courtemanch Sarah Dewey Matthew J. Kauffman Daniel R. MacNulty Johan T. duToit Daniel R. Stahler Arthur D. Middleton |
| author_facet | Owen R. Bidder Thomas Connor Juan M. Morales Gregory J. M. Rickbeil Jerod A. Merkle Rebecca K. Fuda Jared D. Rogerson Brandon M. Scurlock William H. Edwards Eric K. Cole Douglas E. McWhirter Alyson B. Courtemanch Sarah Dewey Matthew J. Kauffman Daniel R. MacNulty Johan T. duToit Daniel R. Stahler Arthur D. Middleton |
| author_sort | Owen R. Bidder |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract For various temperate ungulate species, recent research has highlighted the potential for spring vegetation phenology (“green‐up”) to influence individual condition, with purported benefits to population productivity. However, few studies have been able to measure the benefit on vital rates directly, and fewer still have investigated the comparative influence of other phenological periods on ungulate vital rates. In this study, we tracked phenological changes throughout the duration of the growing season and examined how their timing affected the probability of pregnancy in an ungulate population. We did this for elk (Cervus canadensis) across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) by sampling 1106 adult females in winter at 25 sites over a 13‐year period and assessing sources of variation in pregnancy using a Bayesian hierarchical model. Pregnancy rates were generally high across the GYE (82.4%), and the primary influences on probability of pregnancy were the timing of vegetation senescence (“brown‐down”) in autumn and exposure to the reproductive disease brucellosis. Earlier forage brown‐down in fall negatively influenced the probability of pregnancy of elk aged 6–9 years by an estimated 17.2% within the range (ca. 32 days) of observed brown‐down end dates. While summer habitat quality has been inferred to influence elk pregnancy previously, our findings specify the key influence of foraging conditions later in the seasonal cycle, immediately before the breeding season. The reproductive disease brucellosis was also an important factor, reducing the probability of pregnancy by 12.4% in elk in the 6‐ to 9‐year age class. Because pregnancy was tested before most disease‐induced abortions occur, the apparent mechanism for this effect is a prolonged reduction in fertility beyond the period of initial exposure in which fetal mortality is typically expected. Our results prompt greater scrutiny of the combined effects of late‐season phenology and disease on reproductive rates and population productivity in temperate ungulates. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:05:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5ed3894de7e247fb8a02b0a4b92537ad |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2150-8925 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:05:43Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecosphere |
| spelling | doaj.art-5ed3894de7e247fb8a02b0a4b92537ad2023-12-27T23:58:35ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252023-12-011412n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.4694Forage senescence and disease influence elk pregnancy across the Greater Yellowstone EcosystemOwen R. Bidder0Thomas Connor1Juan M. Morales2Gregory J. M. Rickbeil3Jerod A. Merkle4Rebecca K. Fuda5Jared D. Rogerson6Brandon M. Scurlock7William H. Edwards8Eric K. Cole9Douglas E. McWhirter10Alyson B. Courtemanch11Sarah Dewey12Matthew J. Kauffman13Daniel R. MacNulty14Johan T. duToit15Daniel R. Stahler16Arthur D. Middleton17Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California, Berkeley Berkeley California USADepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California, Berkeley Berkeley California USASchool of Biodiversity, One Health, and Veterinary Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow ScotlandDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California, Berkeley Berkeley California USADepartment of Zoology and Physiology University of Wyoming Laramie Wyoming USAWyoming Game and Fish Department Pinedale Wyoming USAWyoming Game and Fish Department Pinedale Wyoming USAWyoming Game and Fish Department Pinedale Wyoming USAWyoming Game and Fish Wildlife Health Laboratory Laramie Wyoming USANational Elk Refuge U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Jackson Wyoming USAWyoming Game and Fish Department Jackson Wyoming USAWyoming Game and Fish Department Jackson Wyoming USANational Park Service Grand Teton National Park Moose Wyoming USAU.S. Geological Survey, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology University of Wyoming Laramie Wyoming USADepartment of Wildland Resources Utah State University Logan Utah USADepartment of Wildland Resources Utah State University Logan Utah USAYellowstone Center for Resources National Park Service Yellowstone National Park Wyoming USADepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California, Berkeley Berkeley California USAAbstract For various temperate ungulate species, recent research has highlighted the potential for spring vegetation phenology (“green‐up”) to influence individual condition, with purported benefits to population productivity. However, few studies have been able to measure the benefit on vital rates directly, and fewer still have investigated the comparative influence of other phenological periods on ungulate vital rates. In this study, we tracked phenological changes throughout the duration of the growing season and examined how their timing affected the probability of pregnancy in an ungulate population. We did this for elk (Cervus canadensis) across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) by sampling 1106 adult females in winter at 25 sites over a 13‐year period and assessing sources of variation in pregnancy using a Bayesian hierarchical model. Pregnancy rates were generally high across the GYE (82.4%), and the primary influences on probability of pregnancy were the timing of vegetation senescence (“brown‐down”) in autumn and exposure to the reproductive disease brucellosis. Earlier forage brown‐down in fall negatively influenced the probability of pregnancy of elk aged 6–9 years by an estimated 17.2% within the range (ca. 32 days) of observed brown‐down end dates. While summer habitat quality has been inferred to influence elk pregnancy previously, our findings specify the key influence of foraging conditions later in the seasonal cycle, immediately before the breeding season. The reproductive disease brucellosis was also an important factor, reducing the probability of pregnancy by 12.4% in elk in the 6‐ to 9‐year age class. Because pregnancy was tested before most disease‐induced abortions occur, the apparent mechanism for this effect is a prolonged reduction in fertility beyond the period of initial exposure in which fetal mortality is typically expected. Our results prompt greater scrutiny of the combined effects of late‐season phenology and disease on reproductive rates and population productivity in temperate ungulates.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4694animal ecologydisease ecologyelkpopulation ecologywildlife behavior |
| spellingShingle | Owen R. Bidder Thomas Connor Juan M. Morales Gregory J. M. Rickbeil Jerod A. Merkle Rebecca K. Fuda Jared D. Rogerson Brandon M. Scurlock William H. Edwards Eric K. Cole Douglas E. McWhirter Alyson B. Courtemanch Sarah Dewey Matthew J. Kauffman Daniel R. MacNulty Johan T. duToit Daniel R. Stahler Arthur D. Middleton Forage senescence and disease influence elk pregnancy across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Ecosphere animal ecology disease ecology elk population ecology wildlife behavior |
| title | Forage senescence and disease influence elk pregnancy across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem |
| title_full | Forage senescence and disease influence elk pregnancy across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem |
| title_fullStr | Forage senescence and disease influence elk pregnancy across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem |
| title_full_unstemmed | Forage senescence and disease influence elk pregnancy across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem |
| title_short | Forage senescence and disease influence elk pregnancy across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem |
| title_sort | forage senescence and disease influence elk pregnancy across the greater yellowstone ecosystem |
| topic | animal ecology disease ecology elk population ecology wildlife behavior |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4694 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT owenrbidder foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT thomasconnor foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT juanmmorales foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT gregoryjmrickbeil foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT jerodamerkle foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT rebeccakfuda foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT jareddrogerson foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT brandonmscurlock foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT williamhedwards foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT erickcole foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT douglasemcwhirter foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT alysonbcourtemanch foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT sarahdewey foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT matthewjkauffman foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT danielrmacnulty foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT johantdutoit foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT danielrstahler foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem AT arthurdmiddleton foragesenescenceanddiseaseinfluenceelkpregnancyacrossthegreateryellowstoneecosystem |