Application of Economic Evaluation to Assess Feasibility for Reimbursement of Genomic Testing as Part of Personalized Medicine Interventions

Background: The incorporation of genomic testing into clinical practice constitutes an opportunity to improve patients’ lives, as it makes possible the implementation of innovative, individualized clinical interventions that maximize efficacy and/or minimize the risk of adverse drug reactions. In or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stavros Simeonidis, Stefania Koutsilieri, Athanassios Vozikis, David N. Cooper, Christina Mitropoulou, George P. Patrinos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2019.00830/full
_version_ 1811218097565073408
author Stavros Simeonidis
Stefania Koutsilieri
Athanassios Vozikis
David N. Cooper
Christina Mitropoulou
George P. Patrinos
George P. Patrinos
George P. Patrinos
author_facet Stavros Simeonidis
Stefania Koutsilieri
Athanassios Vozikis
David N. Cooper
Christina Mitropoulou
George P. Patrinos
George P. Patrinos
George P. Patrinos
author_sort Stavros Simeonidis
collection DOAJ
description Background: The incorporation of genomic testing into clinical practice constitutes an opportunity to improve patients’ lives, as it makes possible the implementation of innovative, individualized clinical interventions that maximize efficacy and/or minimize the risk of adverse drug reactions. In order to ensure equal access to genomic testing for all patients, the costs associated with these tests should be reimbursed by their respective national healthcare systems. Given that funding for the public health sector is decreasing in real terms, it is of paramount importance that the emerging interventions are thoroughly evaluated both in terms of their clinical effectiveness and their full economic cost.Objective: The aim of this study was to identify those genome-guided interventions that could be adopted and reimbursed by national healthcare systems. Further, we recorded the underlying factors determining the broad adoption of genome-guided interventions in clinical practice, in order to identify potential reimbursement criteria.Methods: We performed a systematic review of published (PubMed-listed) scientific articles on the economic evaluation of those individualized clinical interventions that include genomic tests. Information on genomic tests reimbursed by the US Medicare program was also included. Subsequently, we correlated the regulatory guidance given for the interventions collated in our systematic review with the corresponding economic evaluation results and policies of the Medicare program. Regulatory guidance information was collected from the PharmGKB online knowledgebase and the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC).Results: Most of the included studies constitute cost-utility analyses, in which the outcome of the interventions has been measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) whereas an estimate of the total cost has been based upon direct medical cost data. Favorable economic evaluation results, as well as concrete evidence demonstrating the clinical utility of pre-emptive genotyping, are considered as prerequisites for the broad adoption and reimbursement of the costs incurred during genomic testing. Indicatively, pre-emptive HLA-B*5701 and TPMT testing before administration of abacavir and azathioprine, respectively, is reimbursed by Medicare based on both economic and efficacy evidence. Likewise, the medical necessary screening for MMR and BRCA1/2 genes are reimbursed for high-risk populations.Conclusions: Our findings further underline the need for further cost-utility analyses within different national healthcare systems, in order to promote the reimbursement of the cost of innovative genome-guided therapeutic interventions.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:03:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5eea191d84f442bc8bbc95fcfdeb9d06
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-9812
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:03:41Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-5eea191d84f442bc8bbc95fcfdeb9d062022-12-22T03:42:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122019-08-011010.3389/fphar.2019.00830470729Application of Economic Evaluation to Assess Feasibility for Reimbursement of Genomic Testing as Part of Personalized Medicine InterventionsStavros Simeonidis0Stefania Koutsilieri1Athanassios Vozikis2David N. Cooper3Christina Mitropoulou4George P. Patrinos5George P. Patrinos6George P. Patrinos7Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, GreeceDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, GreeceEconomics Department, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, GreeceInstitute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United KingdomThe Golden Helix Foundation, London, United KingdomDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, GreeceZayed Center of Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab EmiratesDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab EmiratesBackground: The incorporation of genomic testing into clinical practice constitutes an opportunity to improve patients’ lives, as it makes possible the implementation of innovative, individualized clinical interventions that maximize efficacy and/or minimize the risk of adverse drug reactions. In order to ensure equal access to genomic testing for all patients, the costs associated with these tests should be reimbursed by their respective national healthcare systems. Given that funding for the public health sector is decreasing in real terms, it is of paramount importance that the emerging interventions are thoroughly evaluated both in terms of their clinical effectiveness and their full economic cost.Objective: The aim of this study was to identify those genome-guided interventions that could be adopted and reimbursed by national healthcare systems. Further, we recorded the underlying factors determining the broad adoption of genome-guided interventions in clinical practice, in order to identify potential reimbursement criteria.Methods: We performed a systematic review of published (PubMed-listed) scientific articles on the economic evaluation of those individualized clinical interventions that include genomic tests. Information on genomic tests reimbursed by the US Medicare program was also included. Subsequently, we correlated the regulatory guidance given for the interventions collated in our systematic review with the corresponding economic evaluation results and policies of the Medicare program. Regulatory guidance information was collected from the PharmGKB online knowledgebase and the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC).Results: Most of the included studies constitute cost-utility analyses, in which the outcome of the interventions has been measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) whereas an estimate of the total cost has been based upon direct medical cost data. Favorable economic evaluation results, as well as concrete evidence demonstrating the clinical utility of pre-emptive genotyping, are considered as prerequisites for the broad adoption and reimbursement of the costs incurred during genomic testing. Indicatively, pre-emptive HLA-B*5701 and TPMT testing before administration of abacavir and azathioprine, respectively, is reimbursed by Medicare based on both economic and efficacy evidence. Likewise, the medical necessary screening for MMR and BRCA1/2 genes are reimbursed for high-risk populations.Conclusions: Our findings further underline the need for further cost-utility analyses within different national healthcare systems, in order to promote the reimbursement of the cost of innovative genome-guided therapeutic interventions.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2019.00830/fulleconomic evaluationpricingreimbursementgenetic and genomic testspersonalized medicinequality of life
spellingShingle Stavros Simeonidis
Stefania Koutsilieri
Athanassios Vozikis
David N. Cooper
Christina Mitropoulou
George P. Patrinos
George P. Patrinos
George P. Patrinos
Application of Economic Evaluation to Assess Feasibility for Reimbursement of Genomic Testing as Part of Personalized Medicine Interventions
Frontiers in Pharmacology
economic evaluation
pricing
reimbursement
genetic and genomic tests
personalized medicine
quality of life
title Application of Economic Evaluation to Assess Feasibility for Reimbursement of Genomic Testing as Part of Personalized Medicine Interventions
title_full Application of Economic Evaluation to Assess Feasibility for Reimbursement of Genomic Testing as Part of Personalized Medicine Interventions
title_fullStr Application of Economic Evaluation to Assess Feasibility for Reimbursement of Genomic Testing as Part of Personalized Medicine Interventions
title_full_unstemmed Application of Economic Evaluation to Assess Feasibility for Reimbursement of Genomic Testing as Part of Personalized Medicine Interventions
title_short Application of Economic Evaluation to Assess Feasibility for Reimbursement of Genomic Testing as Part of Personalized Medicine Interventions
title_sort application of economic evaluation to assess feasibility for reimbursement of genomic testing as part of personalized medicine interventions
topic economic evaluation
pricing
reimbursement
genetic and genomic tests
personalized medicine
quality of life
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2019.00830/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stavrossimeonidis applicationofeconomicevaluationtoassessfeasibilityforreimbursementofgenomictestingaspartofpersonalizedmedicineinterventions
AT stefaniakoutsilieri applicationofeconomicevaluationtoassessfeasibilityforreimbursementofgenomictestingaspartofpersonalizedmedicineinterventions
AT athanassiosvozikis applicationofeconomicevaluationtoassessfeasibilityforreimbursementofgenomictestingaspartofpersonalizedmedicineinterventions
AT davidncooper applicationofeconomicevaluationtoassessfeasibilityforreimbursementofgenomictestingaspartofpersonalizedmedicineinterventions
AT christinamitropoulou applicationofeconomicevaluationtoassessfeasibilityforreimbursementofgenomictestingaspartofpersonalizedmedicineinterventions
AT georgeppatrinos applicationofeconomicevaluationtoassessfeasibilityforreimbursementofgenomictestingaspartofpersonalizedmedicineinterventions
AT georgeppatrinos applicationofeconomicevaluationtoassessfeasibilityforreimbursementofgenomictestingaspartofpersonalizedmedicineinterventions
AT georgeppatrinos applicationofeconomicevaluationtoassessfeasibilityforreimbursementofgenomictestingaspartofpersonalizedmedicineinterventions