Glyphosate does not substitute for glycine in proteins of actively dividing mammalian cells

Abstract Objectives Glyphosate (N-phosphonomethyl glycine) and its commercial herbicide formulations have been shown to exert toxicity via various mechanisms. It has been asserted that glyphosate substitutes for glycine in polypeptide chains leading to protein misfolding and toxicity. However, as no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael N. Antoniou, Armel Nicolas, Robin Mesnage, Martina Biserni, Francesco V. Rao, Cristina Vazquez Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-019-4534-3
_version_ 1818478885929484288
author Michael N. Antoniou
Armel Nicolas
Robin Mesnage
Martina Biserni
Francesco V. Rao
Cristina Vazquez Martin
author_facet Michael N. Antoniou
Armel Nicolas
Robin Mesnage
Martina Biserni
Francesco V. Rao
Cristina Vazquez Martin
author_sort Michael N. Antoniou
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives Glyphosate (N-phosphonomethyl glycine) and its commercial herbicide formulations have been shown to exert toxicity via various mechanisms. It has been asserted that glyphosate substitutes for glycine in polypeptide chains leading to protein misfolding and toxicity. However, as no direct evidence exists for glycine to glyphosate substitution in proteins, including in mammalian organisms, we tested this claim by conducting a proteomics analysis of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells grown in the presence of 100 mg/L glyphosate for 6 days. Protein extracts from three treated and three untreated cell cultures were analysed as one TMT-6plex labelled sample, to highlight a specific pattern (+/+/+/−/−/−) of reporter intensities for peptides bearing true glyphosate treatment induced-post translational modifications as well as allowing an investigation of the total proteome. Results Comparative statistical analysis of global proteome changes between glyphosate treated and non-treated samples did not show significant differences. Crucially, filtering of data to focus analysis on peptides potentially bearing glycine for glyphosate replacement revealed that the TMT reporter intensity pattern of all candidates showed conclusively that they are all false discoveries, with none displaying the expected TMT pattern for such a substitution. Thus, the assertion that glyphosate substitutes for glycine in protein polypeptide chains is incorrect.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T09:53:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5eee151be1554a3688b0dc715bf75442
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-0500
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T09:53:46Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Research Notes
spelling doaj.art-5eee151be1554a3688b0dc715bf754422022-12-22T01:53:34ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002019-08-011211710.1186/s13104-019-4534-3Glyphosate does not substitute for glycine in proteins of actively dividing mammalian cellsMichael N. Antoniou0Armel Nicolas1Robin Mesnage2Martina Biserni3Francesco V. Rao4Cristina Vazquez Martin5Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Gene Expression and Therapy Group, King’s College London, Guy’s HospitalDC BiosciencesDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Gene Expression and Therapy Group, King’s College London, Guy’s HospitalDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Gene Expression and Therapy Group, King’s College London, Guy’s HospitalDC BiosciencesDC BiosciencesAbstract Objectives Glyphosate (N-phosphonomethyl glycine) and its commercial herbicide formulations have been shown to exert toxicity via various mechanisms. It has been asserted that glyphosate substitutes for glycine in polypeptide chains leading to protein misfolding and toxicity. However, as no direct evidence exists for glycine to glyphosate substitution in proteins, including in mammalian organisms, we tested this claim by conducting a proteomics analysis of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells grown in the presence of 100 mg/L glyphosate for 6 days. Protein extracts from three treated and three untreated cell cultures were analysed as one TMT-6plex labelled sample, to highlight a specific pattern (+/+/+/−/−/−) of reporter intensities for peptides bearing true glyphosate treatment induced-post translational modifications as well as allowing an investigation of the total proteome. Results Comparative statistical analysis of global proteome changes between glyphosate treated and non-treated samples did not show significant differences. Crucially, filtering of data to focus analysis on peptides potentially bearing glycine for glyphosate replacement revealed that the TMT reporter intensity pattern of all candidates showed conclusively that they are all false discoveries, with none displaying the expected TMT pattern for such a substitution. Thus, the assertion that glyphosate substitutes for glycine in protein polypeptide chains is incorrect.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-019-4534-3GlyphosateGlycineProteome
spellingShingle Michael N. Antoniou
Armel Nicolas
Robin Mesnage
Martina Biserni
Francesco V. Rao
Cristina Vazquez Martin
Glyphosate does not substitute for glycine in proteins of actively dividing mammalian cells
BMC Research Notes
Glyphosate
Glycine
Proteome
title Glyphosate does not substitute for glycine in proteins of actively dividing mammalian cells
title_full Glyphosate does not substitute for glycine in proteins of actively dividing mammalian cells
title_fullStr Glyphosate does not substitute for glycine in proteins of actively dividing mammalian cells
title_full_unstemmed Glyphosate does not substitute for glycine in proteins of actively dividing mammalian cells
title_short Glyphosate does not substitute for glycine in proteins of actively dividing mammalian cells
title_sort glyphosate does not substitute for glycine in proteins of actively dividing mammalian cells
topic Glyphosate
Glycine
Proteome
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-019-4534-3
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelnantoniou glyphosatedoesnotsubstituteforglycineinproteinsofactivelydividingmammaliancells
AT armelnicolas glyphosatedoesnotsubstituteforglycineinproteinsofactivelydividingmammaliancells
AT robinmesnage glyphosatedoesnotsubstituteforglycineinproteinsofactivelydividingmammaliancells
AT martinabiserni glyphosatedoesnotsubstituteforglycineinproteinsofactivelydividingmammaliancells
AT francescovrao glyphosatedoesnotsubstituteforglycineinproteinsofactivelydividingmammaliancells
AT cristinavazquezmartin glyphosatedoesnotsubstituteforglycineinproteinsofactivelydividingmammaliancells