A Comparison of A Priori Synthetic Judgments and Hume’s Theory of Abstract Ideas
This essay is to find distinctive aspects of a priori synthetic statements, whose judgment depends upon categories of understanding, in comparison to Hume’s discussion of abstraction and meaning. Through logical analysis of statements containing Kant’s Categories, we will demonstrate that the catego...
Main Authors: | ali moradkhani, peyman pour ghannad |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
2010-09-01
|
Series: | حکمت و فلسفه |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_5811_2eeb7a1daec1437f404627e38022c446.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Hume’s Source of the “Impression-Idea” Distinction*
by: Marco Sgarbi
Published: (2012-11-01) -
KANT’TA SENTETİK A PRİORİ’NİN MATEMATİĞİN GERÇEKLİĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ
by: Abdulhamit Küçükaslan
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Problem syntetyczności sądów a priori w ujęciu Hermanna Lotzego
by: Wojciech HANUSZKIEWICZ
Published: (2012-12-01) -
The Inaccuracy of Sample-Based Confidence Intervals to Estimate A Priori Ones
by: David Trafimow, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
The Gilbertine priories of Alvingham and Bullington : their endowments and benefactors
by: Golding, BJ
Published: (1979)