Applying the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) to Nearshore Habitats in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico

Many countries have classification standards for their environmental resources including criteria for classifying coastal and marine ecosystems. Until 2012, the United States just had a nationwide protocol for classifying terrestrial and aquatic habitats with no national standard for marine and most...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kelly Kingon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-01-01
Series:Geosciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/8/1/22
_version_ 1828367768342233088
author Kelly Kingon
author_facet Kelly Kingon
author_sort Kelly Kingon
collection DOAJ
description Many countries have classification standards for their environmental resources including criteria for classifying coastal and marine ecosystems. Until 2012, the United States just had a nationwide protocol for classifying terrestrial and aquatic habitats with no national standard for marine and most coastal habitats. In 2012 the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) was implemented to address this need. In the past, coastal and marine classifications were developed at the regional or local level. Since its inception, the CMECS has not been applied in many geographic areas. My study was one of the first to apply the CMECS to the benthic habitats in the nearshore Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Sidescan sonar mapping and dive surveys were completed at 33 sites at depths 10–23 m. Hardbottom and sand habitats characterized the study area, and the underwater surveys revealed hard corals, sponges, and macroalgae as the dominant taxa on the hardbottom. The CMECS was applied to the overall study area rather than each individual site or groups of similar sites because habitat and environmental characteristics, primarily outside the context of the CMECS, appeared to influence the distribution of taxa across sites more than the CMECS geoform, substrate, and water column components. The CMECS worked well for classifying the entire study area, but was not adequate for classifying the complex fine-scale habitats and temporal variations observed; modifications to the CMECS could help resolve these issues.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T06:02:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5f101643945c4383a9dd027a98bf040c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3263
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T06:02:31Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Geosciences
spelling doaj.art-5f101643945c4383a9dd027a98bf040c2022-12-22T02:08:42ZengMDPI AGGeosciences2076-32632018-01-01812210.3390/geosciences8010022geosciences8010022Applying the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) to Nearshore Habitats in the Northeastern Gulf of MexicoKelly Kingon0Coastal and Marine Laboratory, Florida State University, St. Teresa, FL 32358, USAMany countries have classification standards for their environmental resources including criteria for classifying coastal and marine ecosystems. Until 2012, the United States just had a nationwide protocol for classifying terrestrial and aquatic habitats with no national standard for marine and most coastal habitats. In 2012 the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) was implemented to address this need. In the past, coastal and marine classifications were developed at the regional or local level. Since its inception, the CMECS has not been applied in many geographic areas. My study was one of the first to apply the CMECS to the benthic habitats in the nearshore Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Sidescan sonar mapping and dive surveys were completed at 33 sites at depths 10–23 m. Hardbottom and sand habitats characterized the study area, and the underwater surveys revealed hard corals, sponges, and macroalgae as the dominant taxa on the hardbottom. The CMECS was applied to the overall study area rather than each individual site or groups of similar sites because habitat and environmental characteristics, primarily outside the context of the CMECS, appeared to influence the distribution of taxa across sites more than the CMECS geoform, substrate, and water column components. The CMECS worked well for classifying the entire study area, but was not adequate for classifying the complex fine-scale habitats and temporal variations observed; modifications to the CMECS could help resolve these issues.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/8/1/22Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standardmarine habitat classificationGulf of Mexicohardbottom
spellingShingle Kelly Kingon
Applying the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) to Nearshore Habitats in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico
Geosciences
Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard
marine habitat classification
Gulf of Mexico
hardbottom
title Applying the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) to Nearshore Habitats in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico
title_full Applying the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) to Nearshore Habitats in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico
title_fullStr Applying the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) to Nearshore Habitats in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico
title_full_unstemmed Applying the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) to Nearshore Habitats in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico
title_short Applying the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) to Nearshore Habitats in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico
title_sort applying the coastal and marine ecological classification standard cmecs to nearshore habitats in the northeastern gulf of mexico
topic Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard
marine habitat classification
Gulf of Mexico
hardbottom
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/8/1/22
work_keys_str_mv AT kellykingon applyingthecoastalandmarineecologicalclassificationstandardcmecstonearshorehabitatsinthenortheasterngulfofmexico