Mid-level health providers for primary healthcare: a rapid evidence synthesis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Background: Healthcare services, in many countries, are increasingly being provided by cadres not trained as physicians, and these substitute health workers are referred to as mid-level health providers (MLHPs). The objective of this study was to rapidly synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandeep Moola, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Devaki Nambiar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2021-05-01
Series:F1000Research
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/9-616/v2
_version_ 1818437085835558912
author Sandeep Moola
Soumyadeep Bhaumik
Devaki Nambiar
author_facet Sandeep Moola
Soumyadeep Bhaumik
Devaki Nambiar
author_sort Sandeep Moola
collection DOAJ
description Background: Healthcare services, in many countries, are increasingly being provided by cadres not trained as physicians, and these substitute health workers are referred to as mid-level health providers (MLHPs). The objective of this study was to rapidly synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of MLHPs involved in the delivery of healthcare, with a perspective on low- and middle-income countries. Methods: The review team performed an overview of systematic reviews assessing various outcomes for participants receiving care from MLHPs. The team evaluated systematic reviews for methodological quality and certainty of the evidence. Also, the review team consulted relevant stakeholders in India. Results: The final report included seven systematic reviews, with six assessed as moderate to high methodological quality. Mortality outcomes concerning pregnancy and childbirth care services showed no significant differences in care provided by MLHPs when compared with doctors. Pregnancy care provided by midwives was found to improve the quality of care slightly. The risk of failure or incomplete abortion for surgical abortion procedures provided by MLHPs was twice when compared to the procedures provided by doctors. Moderate to high certainty evidence showed that initiation and maintenance of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected patients by a nurse or clinical officer slightly reduced mortality. High certainty evidence showed that chronic disease management by non-medical prescribers reduced some important physiological measures compared to medical prescribing by doctors. Conclusions: To date, this is the first rapid overview of the evidence on MLHPs. Low-quality evidence suggests that MLHPs might be suitable to deliver quality pregnancy care. Moderate and high-quality evidence from trials suggests that MLHPs are helpful for chronic disease management and initiation and maintenance of antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV/AIDS. However, the roles and subsequent training and regulation of MLHPs might be different for different care domains.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T17:19:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5f138fef0d7c4e699130c145dcac8009
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-1402
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T17:19:04Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
record_format Article
series F1000Research
spelling doaj.art-5f138fef0d7c4e699130c145dcac80092022-12-21T22:53:21ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022021-05-01910.12688/f1000research.24279.256486Mid-level health providers for primary healthcare: a rapid evidence synthesis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]Sandeep Moola0Soumyadeep Bhaumik1Devaki Nambiar2George Institute for Global Health, Vishakhapatnam, IndiaGeorge Institute for Global Health, Vishakhapatnam, IndiaGeorge Institute for Global Health, Vishakhapatnam, IndiaBackground: Healthcare services, in many countries, are increasingly being provided by cadres not trained as physicians, and these substitute health workers are referred to as mid-level health providers (MLHPs). The objective of this study was to rapidly synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of MLHPs involved in the delivery of healthcare, with a perspective on low- and middle-income countries. Methods: The review team performed an overview of systematic reviews assessing various outcomes for participants receiving care from MLHPs. The team evaluated systematic reviews for methodological quality and certainty of the evidence. Also, the review team consulted relevant stakeholders in India. Results: The final report included seven systematic reviews, with six assessed as moderate to high methodological quality. Mortality outcomes concerning pregnancy and childbirth care services showed no significant differences in care provided by MLHPs when compared with doctors. Pregnancy care provided by midwives was found to improve the quality of care slightly. The risk of failure or incomplete abortion for surgical abortion procedures provided by MLHPs was twice when compared to the procedures provided by doctors. Moderate to high certainty evidence showed that initiation and maintenance of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected patients by a nurse or clinical officer slightly reduced mortality. High certainty evidence showed that chronic disease management by non-medical prescribers reduced some important physiological measures compared to medical prescribing by doctors. Conclusions: To date, this is the first rapid overview of the evidence on MLHPs. Low-quality evidence suggests that MLHPs might be suitable to deliver quality pregnancy care. Moderate and high-quality evidence from trials suggests that MLHPs are helpful for chronic disease management and initiation and maintenance of antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV/AIDS. However, the roles and subsequent training and regulation of MLHPs might be different for different care domains.https://f1000research.com/articles/9-616/v2
spellingShingle Sandeep Moola
Soumyadeep Bhaumik
Devaki Nambiar
Mid-level health providers for primary healthcare: a rapid evidence synthesis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
F1000Research
title Mid-level health providers for primary healthcare: a rapid evidence synthesis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full Mid-level health providers for primary healthcare: a rapid evidence synthesis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr Mid-level health providers for primary healthcare: a rapid evidence synthesis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed Mid-level health providers for primary healthcare: a rapid evidence synthesis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short Mid-level health providers for primary healthcare: a rapid evidence synthesis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort mid level health providers for primary healthcare a rapid evidence synthesis version 2 peer review 2 approved
url https://f1000research.com/articles/9-616/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT sandeepmoola midlevelhealthprovidersforprimaryhealthcarearapidevidencesynthesisversion2peerreview2approved
AT soumyadeepbhaumik midlevelhealthprovidersforprimaryhealthcarearapidevidencesynthesisversion2peerreview2approved
AT devakinambiar midlevelhealthprovidersforprimaryhealthcarearapidevidencesynthesisversion2peerreview2approved