Different Coefficients and Exponents for Metabolic Body Weight in a Model to Estimate Individual Feed Intake for Growing-finishing Pigs

Estimation of feed intake (FI) for individual animals within a pen is needed in situations where more than one animal share a feeder during feeding trials. A partitioning method (PM) was previously published as a model to estimate the individual FI (IFI). Briefly, the IFI of a pig within the pen was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. A. Lee, C. Kong, O. Adeola, B. G. Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies 2016-12-01
Series:Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/ajas-29-12-1756.pdf
_version_ 1819241514472046592
author S. A. Lee
C. Kong
O. Adeola
B. G. Kim
author_facet S. A. Lee
C. Kong
O. Adeola
B. G. Kim
author_sort S. A. Lee
collection DOAJ
description Estimation of feed intake (FI) for individual animals within a pen is needed in situations where more than one animal share a feeder during feeding trials. A partitioning method (PM) was previously published as a model to estimate the individual FI (IFI). Briefly, the IFI of a pig within the pen was calculated by partitioning IFI into IFI for maintenance (IFIm) and IFI for growth. In the PM, IFIm is determined based on the metabolic body weight (BW), which is calculated using the coefficient of 106 and exponent of 0.75. Two simulation studies were conducted to test the hypothesis that the use of different coefficients and exponents for metabolic BW to calculate IFIm improves the accuracy of the estimates of IFI for pigs, and that PM is applied to pigs fed in group-housing systems. The accuracy of prediction represented by difference between actual and estimated IFI was compared using PM, ratio (RM), or averaging method (AM). In simulation studies 1 and 2, the PM estimated IFI better than the AM and RM during most of the periods (p<0.05). The use of 0.60 as the exponent and the coefficient of 197 to calculate metabolic BW did not improve the accuracy of the IFI estimates in both simulation studies 1 and 2. The results imply that the use of 197 kcal×kg BW0.60 as metabolizable energy for maintenance in PM does not improve the accuracy of IFI estimations compared with the use of 106 kcal×kg BW0.75 and that the PM estimates the IFI of pigs with greater accuracy compared with the averaging or ratio methods in group-housing systems.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T14:25:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5f222dc3ec514769a1e9939c5ae0c67c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1011-2367
1976-5517
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T14:25:07Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
record_format Article
series Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
spelling doaj.art-5f222dc3ec514769a1e9939c5ae0c67c2022-12-21T17:43:41ZengAsian-Australasian Association of Animal Production SocietiesAsian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences1011-23671976-55172016-12-0129121756176010.5713/ajas.16.042023621Different Coefficients and Exponents for Metabolic Body Weight in a Model to Estimate Individual Feed Intake for Growing-finishing PigsS. A. Lee0C. Kong1O. Adeola2B. G. Kim3 Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USAEstimation of feed intake (FI) for individual animals within a pen is needed in situations where more than one animal share a feeder during feeding trials. A partitioning method (PM) was previously published as a model to estimate the individual FI (IFI). Briefly, the IFI of a pig within the pen was calculated by partitioning IFI into IFI for maintenance (IFIm) and IFI for growth. In the PM, IFIm is determined based on the metabolic body weight (BW), which is calculated using the coefficient of 106 and exponent of 0.75. Two simulation studies were conducted to test the hypothesis that the use of different coefficients and exponents for metabolic BW to calculate IFIm improves the accuracy of the estimates of IFI for pigs, and that PM is applied to pigs fed in group-housing systems. The accuracy of prediction represented by difference between actual and estimated IFI was compared using PM, ratio (RM), or averaging method (AM). In simulation studies 1 and 2, the PM estimated IFI better than the AM and RM during most of the periods (p<0.05). The use of 0.60 as the exponent and the coefficient of 197 to calculate metabolic BW did not improve the accuracy of the IFI estimates in both simulation studies 1 and 2. The results imply that the use of 197 kcal×kg BW0.60 as metabolizable energy for maintenance in PM does not improve the accuracy of IFI estimations compared with the use of 106 kcal×kg BW0.75 and that the PM estimates the IFI of pigs with greater accuracy compared with the averaging or ratio methods in group-housing systems.http://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/ajas-29-12-1756.pdfFeed ConsumptionGroup-housingGrowth PerformanceMaintenance EnergySwine
spellingShingle S. A. Lee
C. Kong
O. Adeola
B. G. Kim
Different Coefficients and Exponents for Metabolic Body Weight in a Model to Estimate Individual Feed Intake for Growing-finishing Pigs
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Feed Consumption
Group-housing
Growth Performance
Maintenance Energy
Swine
title Different Coefficients and Exponents for Metabolic Body Weight in a Model to Estimate Individual Feed Intake for Growing-finishing Pigs
title_full Different Coefficients and Exponents for Metabolic Body Weight in a Model to Estimate Individual Feed Intake for Growing-finishing Pigs
title_fullStr Different Coefficients and Exponents for Metabolic Body Weight in a Model to Estimate Individual Feed Intake for Growing-finishing Pigs
title_full_unstemmed Different Coefficients and Exponents for Metabolic Body Weight in a Model to Estimate Individual Feed Intake for Growing-finishing Pigs
title_short Different Coefficients and Exponents for Metabolic Body Weight in a Model to Estimate Individual Feed Intake for Growing-finishing Pigs
title_sort different coefficients and exponents for metabolic body weight in a model to estimate individual feed intake for growing finishing pigs
topic Feed Consumption
Group-housing
Growth Performance
Maintenance Energy
Swine
url http://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/ajas-29-12-1756.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT salee differentcoefficientsandexponentsformetabolicbodyweightinamodeltoestimateindividualfeedintakeforgrowingfinishingpigs
AT ckong differentcoefficientsandexponentsformetabolicbodyweightinamodeltoestimateindividualfeedintakeforgrowingfinishingpigs
AT oadeola differentcoefficientsandexponentsformetabolicbodyweightinamodeltoestimateindividualfeedintakeforgrowingfinishingpigs
AT bgkim differentcoefficientsandexponentsformetabolicbodyweightinamodeltoestimateindividualfeedintakeforgrowingfinishingpigs