The politics of climate risk assessment

Abstract Almost 25 years ago, sociologist Anthony Giddens wrote that ‘risk and responsibility are in fact closely linked’1. Extending this to climate risk, this perspective paper argues that climate risk assessment is not just a scientific endeavour but also deeply political. As climate risks become...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johanna Hedlund
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-12-01
Series:npj Climate Action
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-023-00078-x
_version_ 1827399268872224768
author Johanna Hedlund
author_facet Johanna Hedlund
author_sort Johanna Hedlund
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Almost 25 years ago, sociologist Anthony Giddens wrote that ‘risk and responsibility are in fact closely linked’1. Extending this to climate risk, this perspective paper argues that climate risk assessment is not just a scientific endeavour but also deeply political. As climate risks become more complex and demand more science- and policy-driven integration across sectors and regions, assessments may involve significant political constraints that impede effective and just climate adaptation. Using a framework of integration challenges, this paper uncovers political constraints that may arise in developing integrated climate risk assessment. It argues that the framing and structuring of climate risk assessment may yield political constraints such as biases towards certain groups, sectoral incoherence, decisions not aiding the most exposed, distributional conflicts, and ambiguous responsibility in managing complex climate risks. Left unaddressed, such political constraints may hamper climate adaptation rather than enable progress.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:43:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5f352180b380438b9b4ae8aab7a8162c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2731-9814
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:43:22Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series npj Climate Action
spelling doaj.art-5f352180b380438b9b4ae8aab7a8162c2023-12-24T12:32:23ZengNature Portfolionpj Climate Action2731-98142023-12-01211510.1038/s44168-023-00078-xThe politics of climate risk assessmentJohanna Hedlund0Department of Earth System Science, Stanford UniversityAbstract Almost 25 years ago, sociologist Anthony Giddens wrote that ‘risk and responsibility are in fact closely linked’1. Extending this to climate risk, this perspective paper argues that climate risk assessment is not just a scientific endeavour but also deeply political. As climate risks become more complex and demand more science- and policy-driven integration across sectors and regions, assessments may involve significant political constraints that impede effective and just climate adaptation. Using a framework of integration challenges, this paper uncovers political constraints that may arise in developing integrated climate risk assessment. It argues that the framing and structuring of climate risk assessment may yield political constraints such as biases towards certain groups, sectoral incoherence, decisions not aiding the most exposed, distributional conflicts, and ambiguous responsibility in managing complex climate risks. Left unaddressed, such political constraints may hamper climate adaptation rather than enable progress.https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-023-00078-x
spellingShingle Johanna Hedlund
The politics of climate risk assessment
npj Climate Action
title The politics of climate risk assessment
title_full The politics of climate risk assessment
title_fullStr The politics of climate risk assessment
title_full_unstemmed The politics of climate risk assessment
title_short The politics of climate risk assessment
title_sort politics of climate risk assessment
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-023-00078-x
work_keys_str_mv AT johannahedlund thepoliticsofclimateriskassessment
AT johannahedlund politicsofclimateriskassessment