Direct oral anticoagulants versus low molecular weight heparins for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Abstract Background Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been included in guidelines for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) to be extended to suitable cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of using DOACs and low molecular weigh...
Main Authors: | Kaidireyahan Wumaier, Wenqian Li, Naifei Chen, Jiuwei Cui |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Thrombosis Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-021-00319-1 |
Similar Items
-
New Oral Anticoagulants Open New Horizons for Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism
by: Wumaier K, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Asymptomatic “breakthrough” thrombosis and anticoagulant “failure”: Keep calm and carry on
by: Sven R. Olson, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Direct oral anticoagulant versus low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: 2022 updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
by: Corinne Frere, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
by: Florian Moik, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01) -
The Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis According to the Current Literature
by: Petroula Nana, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)