Valuation of agrifood SMEs. Lessons to be learnt from the stock market

The European agrifood industry is mostly characterized by small and medium enterprises (SMEs); as in 2013, SMEs represented 99.13% of the total number of companies. The valuation of SMEs not listed in any stock market is a complex task since there is not enough information on comparable transactions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raül Vidal, Javier Ribal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) 2018-02-01
Series:Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/11668
_version_ 1827165782931406848
author Raül Vidal
Javier Ribal
author_facet Raül Vidal
Javier Ribal
author_sort Raül Vidal
collection DOAJ
description The European agrifood industry is mostly characterized by small and medium enterprises (SMEs); as in 2013, SMEs represented 99.13% of the total number of companies. The valuation of SMEs not listed in any stock market is a complex task since there is not enough information on comparable transactions. When applying discounted cash flow (DCF) models to value private agrifood companies, the capital structure and the cost of equity are two key parameters to be determined. The implications of these parameters in the value of the enterprise are not clear inasmuch as it is not possible to carry out a contrast due, precisely, to the lack of comparables. The main goal of this study is to determine the biases that those two parameters can introduce into the valuation process of an agrifood company. We have used the stock market as a framework wherein to apply a simple fundamental model to the companies of the European food industry in order to obtain three valuation multiples. By means of two bootstrap approaches, the bias induced in the multiples has been assessed for every year from 2002-2013. Results show that the use of the return on equity as cost of equity tends to undervaluation; the use of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) tends to a slight overvaluation, whereas using the total beta induces an undervaluation bias. Moreover, the capital structure shows little influence on the valuation multiples. The conclusions drawn from this paper can be useful for managers and shareholders of privately-held agrifood companies.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:26:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5f45ce66e6e04b2f990a0305e27ca852
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2171-9292
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-21T01:37:58Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
record_format Article
series Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
spelling doaj.art-5f45ce66e6e04b2f990a0305e27ca8522024-08-03T00:08:52ZengConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research2171-92922018-02-01154e0118e011810.5424/sjar/2017154-116682625Valuation of agrifood SMEs. Lessons to be learnt from the stock marketRaül Vidal0Javier Ribal1Institut Els Alfacs, Dept. Administration and Management. San Carles de la Ràpita (Tarragona)Universitat Politècnica de València, Dept. Economic and Social Sciences. Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 ValenciaThe European agrifood industry is mostly characterized by small and medium enterprises (SMEs); as in 2013, SMEs represented 99.13% of the total number of companies. The valuation of SMEs not listed in any stock market is a complex task since there is not enough information on comparable transactions. When applying discounted cash flow (DCF) models to value private agrifood companies, the capital structure and the cost of equity are two key parameters to be determined. The implications of these parameters in the value of the enterprise are not clear inasmuch as it is not possible to carry out a contrast due, precisely, to the lack of comparables. The main goal of this study is to determine the biases that those two parameters can introduce into the valuation process of an agrifood company. We have used the stock market as a framework wherein to apply a simple fundamental model to the companies of the European food industry in order to obtain three valuation multiples. By means of two bootstrap approaches, the bias induced in the multiples has been assessed for every year from 2002-2013. Results show that the use of the return on equity as cost of equity tends to undervaluation; the use of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) tends to a slight overvaluation, whereas using the total beta induces an undervaluation bias. Moreover, the capital structure shows little influence on the valuation multiples. The conclusions drawn from this paper can be useful for managers and shareholders of privately-held agrifood companies.http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/11668bootstrapcapital structureCAPMcompany valuationcost of equityprivate companies
spellingShingle Raül Vidal
Javier Ribal
Valuation of agrifood SMEs. Lessons to be learnt from the stock market
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
bootstrap
capital structure
CAPM
company valuation
cost of equity
private companies
title Valuation of agrifood SMEs. Lessons to be learnt from the stock market
title_full Valuation of agrifood SMEs. Lessons to be learnt from the stock market
title_fullStr Valuation of agrifood SMEs. Lessons to be learnt from the stock market
title_full_unstemmed Valuation of agrifood SMEs. Lessons to be learnt from the stock market
title_short Valuation of agrifood SMEs. Lessons to be learnt from the stock market
title_sort valuation of agrifood smes lessons to be learnt from the stock market
topic bootstrap
capital structure
CAPM
company valuation
cost of equity
private companies
url http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/11668
work_keys_str_mv AT raulvidal valuationofagrifoodsmeslessonstobelearntfromthestockmarket
AT javierribal valuationofagrifoodsmeslessonstobelearntfromthestockmarket