Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section under General or spinal anesthesia- retrospective study

Introduction: World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that the exact impacts of cesarean section on maternal and neonatal health are uncertain. This study was performed with aim to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes after vaginal delivery, cesarean section with general anesthesia or spinal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Karami, Sara Khademi, Zeinabsadat Fattahi Saravi, Reza Jouybar, Zahra Esmaeilinezhad, Elham Asadpour
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2020-06-01
Series:Majallah-i Zanān, Māmā̓ī va Nāzā̓ī-i Īrān
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijogi.mums.ac.ir/article_16284_c97ac23a619aee5989cc2d8e509a876a.pdf
_version_ 1797984768571211776
author Ali Karami
Sara Khademi
Zeinabsadat Fattahi Saravi
Reza Jouybar
Zahra Esmaeilinezhad
Elham Asadpour
author_facet Ali Karami
Sara Khademi
Zeinabsadat Fattahi Saravi
Reza Jouybar
Zahra Esmaeilinezhad
Elham Asadpour
author_sort Ali Karami
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that the exact impacts of cesarean section on maternal and neonatal health are uncertain. This study was performed with aim to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes after vaginal delivery, cesarean section with general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia. Methods: In this retrospective study, 122 medical records of women who underwent vaginal delivery and non-emergency cesarean section at Ghadir Mother and Child Hospital affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2015-2016 were divided into three groups of 36 subjects (vaginal delivery, cesarean section with general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia) were evaluated. Maternal heart rate and blood pressure, Apgar score, and fetal blood gas of umbilical cord were assessed. Data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 19) and One-way ANOVA test was used for parametric data between groups and repeated measure for evaluating the effect of time in the groups. P Results: Exact Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min showed no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.39 and P = 0.91, respectively). Fetal pH was higher in cesarean group with spinal anesthesia (P = 0.05) while PO2 and HCo3 were higher in cesarean group with general anesthesia (P = 0.04). Postpartum systolic blood pressure in women under spinal anesthesia and diastolic blood pressure in women under general anesthesia were significantly different with other two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: Postpartum systolic blood pressure was higher in women under spinal anesthesia and diastolic blood pressure was higher in women under general anesthesia than other groups. pH of the infant's blood was higher in the cesarean group with spinal anesthesia, and the oxygen and bicarbonate pressure in the umbilical cord blood of the infants was higher in the cesarean group with general anesthesia, but the Apgar score and carbon dioxide pressure did not differ between the groups.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:06:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5f4a9b3e5e9744ab92086eb17e41d59d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-2993
2008-2363
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-11T07:06:51Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Majallah-i Zanān, Māmā̓ī va Nāzā̓ī-i Īrān
spelling doaj.art-5f4a9b3e5e9744ab92086eb17e41d59d2022-12-22T04:38:22ZfasMashhad University of Medical SciencesMajallah-i Zanān, Māmā̓ī va Nāzā̓ī-i Īrān1680-29932008-23632020-06-01234152310.22038/ijogi.2020.1628416284Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section under General or spinal anesthesia- retrospective studyAli Karami0Sara Khademi1Zeinabsadat Fattahi Saravi2Reza Jouybar3Zahra Esmaeilinezhad4Elham Asadpour5Assistant professor, Department of Anesthesia, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.Physician, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.Assistant professor, Department of Anesthesia, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.Assistant professor, Department of Anesthesia, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.M.Sc. in Nutrition Sciences, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.Assistant professor of pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.Introduction: World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that the exact impacts of cesarean section on maternal and neonatal health are uncertain. This study was performed with aim to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes after vaginal delivery, cesarean section with general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia. Methods: In this retrospective study, 122 medical records of women who underwent vaginal delivery and non-emergency cesarean section at Ghadir Mother and Child Hospital affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2015-2016 were divided into three groups of 36 subjects (vaginal delivery, cesarean section with general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia) were evaluated. Maternal heart rate and blood pressure, Apgar score, and fetal blood gas of umbilical cord were assessed. Data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 19) and One-way ANOVA test was used for parametric data between groups and repeated measure for evaluating the effect of time in the groups. P Results: Exact Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min showed no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.39 and P = 0.91, respectively). Fetal pH was higher in cesarean group with spinal anesthesia (P = 0.05) while PO2 and HCo3 were higher in cesarean group with general anesthesia (P = 0.04). Postpartum systolic blood pressure in women under spinal anesthesia and diastolic blood pressure in women under general anesthesia were significantly different with other two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: Postpartum systolic blood pressure was higher in women under spinal anesthesia and diastolic blood pressure was higher in women under general anesthesia than other groups. pH of the infant's blood was higher in the cesarean group with spinal anesthesia, and the oxygen and bicarbonate pressure in the umbilical cord blood of the infants was higher in the cesarean group with general anesthesia, but the Apgar score and carbon dioxide pressure did not differ between the groups.https://ijogi.mums.ac.ir/article_16284_c97ac23a619aee5989cc2d8e509a876a.pdfapgarcesarean sectiongeneral anesthesiaspinal anesthesiavaginal delivery
spellingShingle Ali Karami
Sara Khademi
Zeinabsadat Fattahi Saravi
Reza Jouybar
Zahra Esmaeilinezhad
Elham Asadpour
Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section under General or spinal anesthesia- retrospective study
Majallah-i Zanān, Māmā̓ī va Nāzā̓ī-i Īrān
apgar
cesarean section
general anesthesia
spinal anesthesia
vaginal delivery
title Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section under General or spinal anesthesia- retrospective study
title_full Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section under General or spinal anesthesia- retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section under General or spinal anesthesia- retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section under General or spinal anesthesia- retrospective study
title_short Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section under General or spinal anesthesia- retrospective study
title_sort comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between vaginal delivery and cesarean section under general or spinal anesthesia retrospective study
topic apgar
cesarean section
general anesthesia
spinal anesthesia
vaginal delivery
url https://ijogi.mums.ac.ir/article_16284_c97ac23a619aee5989cc2d8e509a876a.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alikarami comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenvaginaldeliveryandcesareansectionundergeneralorspinalanesthesiaretrospectivestudy
AT sarakhademi comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenvaginaldeliveryandcesareansectionundergeneralorspinalanesthesiaretrospectivestudy
AT zeinabsadatfattahisaravi comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenvaginaldeliveryandcesareansectionundergeneralorspinalanesthesiaretrospectivestudy
AT rezajouybar comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenvaginaldeliveryandcesareansectionundergeneralorspinalanesthesiaretrospectivestudy
AT zahraesmaeilinezhad comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenvaginaldeliveryandcesareansectionundergeneralorspinalanesthesiaretrospectivestudy
AT elhamasadpour comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenvaginaldeliveryandcesareansectionundergeneralorspinalanesthesiaretrospectivestudy