TIPE PEMBUKTIAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU MATEMATIKA
The ability to prove formal mathematics is an important ability that must be mastered by undergraduate prospective mathematics teachers. However, students who are prospective mathematics teachers have difficulty in constructing proof in mathematics courses. Therefore, this study aims to explore the...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Indonesian |
Published: |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/3443 |
_version_ | 1818017111618879488 |
---|---|
author | Mu'jizatin Fadiana Yulaikah Yulaikah Lajianto Lajianto |
author_facet | Mu'jizatin Fadiana Yulaikah Yulaikah Lajianto Lajianto |
author_sort | Mu'jizatin Fadiana |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The ability to prove formal mathematics is an important ability that must be mastered by undergraduate prospective mathematics teachers. However, students who are prospective mathematics teachers have difficulty in constructing proof in mathematics courses. Therefore, this study aims to explore the tendency of mathematical proof methods for prospective mathematics teachers in second year lectures. The method used in this research is quantitative descriptive research. Participants in this study were 30 prospective mathematics teachers at a tertiary institution in Tuban, East Java. The research instrument is a simple task of compiling mathematical evidence. The results of the study were analyzed using the classification of types of proof by Miyazaki, namely classifying the types of deductive and inductive reasoning. The results showed that prospective mathematics teachers had a greater tendency to use deductive reasoning than using inductive reasoning. Type A proof is the most common type of proof. In addition, around 70% of prospective teachers still experience difficulties in compiling evidentiary tasks. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-14T07:21:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-5f4ebe1a3f124daebe2e6a1705a7baa3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2089-8703 2442-5419 |
language | Indonesian |
last_indexed | 2024-04-14T07:21:37Z |
publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro |
record_format | Article |
series | Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika |
spelling | doaj.art-5f4ebe1a3f124daebe2e6a1705a7baa32022-12-22T02:06:08ZindUniversitas Muhammadiyah MetroAksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika2089-87032442-54192021-04-0110135135810.24127/ajpm.v10i1.34431618TIPE PEMBUKTIAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU MATEMATIKAMu'jizatin Fadiana0Yulaikah YulaikahLajianto LajiantoUniversitas PGRI Ronggolawe TubanThe ability to prove formal mathematics is an important ability that must be mastered by undergraduate prospective mathematics teachers. However, students who are prospective mathematics teachers have difficulty in constructing proof in mathematics courses. Therefore, this study aims to explore the tendency of mathematical proof methods for prospective mathematics teachers in second year lectures. The method used in this research is quantitative descriptive research. Participants in this study were 30 prospective mathematics teachers at a tertiary institution in Tuban, East Java. The research instrument is a simple task of compiling mathematical evidence. The results of the study were analyzed using the classification of types of proof by Miyazaki, namely classifying the types of deductive and inductive reasoning. The results showed that prospective mathematics teachers had a greater tendency to use deductive reasoning than using inductive reasoning. Type A proof is the most common type of proof. In addition, around 70% of prospective teachers still experience difficulties in compiling evidentiary tasks.https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/3443deductive-inductive proofing, mathematical proof, prospective teachers |
spellingShingle | Mu'jizatin Fadiana Yulaikah Yulaikah Lajianto Lajianto TIPE PEMBUKTIAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU MATEMATIKA Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika deductive-inductive proofing, mathematical proof, prospective teachers |
title | TIPE PEMBUKTIAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU MATEMATIKA |
title_full | TIPE PEMBUKTIAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU MATEMATIKA |
title_fullStr | TIPE PEMBUKTIAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU MATEMATIKA |
title_full_unstemmed | TIPE PEMBUKTIAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU MATEMATIKA |
title_short | TIPE PEMBUKTIAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU MATEMATIKA |
title_sort | tipe pembuktian mahasiswa calon guru matematika |
topic | deductive-inductive proofing, mathematical proof, prospective teachers |
url | https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/3443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mujizatinfadiana tipepembuktianmahasiswacalongurumatematika AT yulaikahyulaikah tipepembuktianmahasiswacalongurumatematika AT lajiantolajianto tipepembuktianmahasiswacalongurumatematika |