The potential for bi-lateral agreements in medical tourism: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives from the UK and India

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Globalisation has prompted countries to evaluate their position on trade in health services. However, this is often done from a multi-lateral, rather than a regional or bi-lateral perspective. In a previous review, we concluded that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Smith Richard D, Chanda Rupa, Martínez Álvarez Melisa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-05-01
Series:Globalization and Health
Online Access:http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/7/1/11
_version_ 1818751624427864064
author Smith Richard D
Chanda Rupa
Martínez Álvarez Melisa
author_facet Smith Richard D
Chanda Rupa
Martínez Álvarez Melisa
author_sort Smith Richard D
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Globalisation has prompted countries to evaluate their position on trade in health services. However, this is often done from a multi-lateral, rather than a regional or bi-lateral perspective. In a previous review, we concluded that most of the issues raised could be better addressed from a bi-lateral relationship. We report here the results of a qualitative exercise to assess stakeholders' perceptions on the prospects for such a bi-lateral system, and its ability to address concerns associated with medical tourism.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>30 semi-structured interviews were carried out with stakeholders, 20 in India and 10 in the UK, to assess their views on the potential offered by a bi-lateral relationship on medical tourism between both countries. Issues discussed include data availability, origin of medical tourists, quality and continuity of care, regulation and litigation, barriers to medical tourism, policy changes needed, and prospects for such a bi-lateral relationship.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The majority of stakeholders were concerned about the quality of health services patients would receive abroad, regulation and litigation procedures, lack of continuity of care, and the effect of such trade on the healthcare available to the local population in India. However, when considering trade from a bi-lateral point of view, there was disagreement on how these issues would apply. There was further disagreement on the importance of the Diaspora and the validity of the UK's 'rule' that patients should not fly more than three hours to obtain care. Although the opinion on the prospects for an India-UK bi-lateral relationship was varied, there was no consensus on what policy changes would be needed for such a relationship to take place.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Whilst the literature review previously carried out suggested that a bi-lateral relationship would be best-placed to address the concerns regarding medical tourism, there was scepticism from the analysis provided in this paper based on the over-riding feeling that the political 'cost' involved was likely to be the major impediment. This makes the need for better evidence even more acute, as much of the current policy process could well be based on entrenched ideological positions, rather than secure evidence of impact.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-18T04:38:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5f63189d08144a49b67a1e53b4687b50
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1744-8603
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T04:38:32Z
publishDate 2011-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Globalization and Health
spelling doaj.art-5f63189d08144a49b67a1e53b4687b502022-12-21T21:20:47ZengBMCGlobalization and Health1744-86032011-05-01711110.1186/1744-8603-7-11The potential for bi-lateral agreements in medical tourism: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives from the UK and IndiaSmith Richard DChanda RupaMartínez Álvarez Melisa<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Globalisation has prompted countries to evaluate their position on trade in health services. However, this is often done from a multi-lateral, rather than a regional or bi-lateral perspective. In a previous review, we concluded that most of the issues raised could be better addressed from a bi-lateral relationship. We report here the results of a qualitative exercise to assess stakeholders' perceptions on the prospects for such a bi-lateral system, and its ability to address concerns associated with medical tourism.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>30 semi-structured interviews were carried out with stakeholders, 20 in India and 10 in the UK, to assess their views on the potential offered by a bi-lateral relationship on medical tourism between both countries. Issues discussed include data availability, origin of medical tourists, quality and continuity of care, regulation and litigation, barriers to medical tourism, policy changes needed, and prospects for such a bi-lateral relationship.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The majority of stakeholders were concerned about the quality of health services patients would receive abroad, regulation and litigation procedures, lack of continuity of care, and the effect of such trade on the healthcare available to the local population in India. However, when considering trade from a bi-lateral point of view, there was disagreement on how these issues would apply. There was further disagreement on the importance of the Diaspora and the validity of the UK's 'rule' that patients should not fly more than three hours to obtain care. Although the opinion on the prospects for an India-UK bi-lateral relationship was varied, there was no consensus on what policy changes would be needed for such a relationship to take place.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Whilst the literature review previously carried out suggested that a bi-lateral relationship would be best-placed to address the concerns regarding medical tourism, there was scepticism from the analysis provided in this paper based on the over-riding feeling that the political 'cost' involved was likely to be the major impediment. This makes the need for better evidence even more acute, as much of the current policy process could well be based on entrenched ideological positions, rather than secure evidence of impact.</p>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/7/1/11
spellingShingle Smith Richard D
Chanda Rupa
Martínez Álvarez Melisa
The potential for bi-lateral agreements in medical tourism: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives from the UK and India
Globalization and Health
title The potential for bi-lateral agreements in medical tourism: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives from the UK and India
title_full The potential for bi-lateral agreements in medical tourism: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives from the UK and India
title_fullStr The potential for bi-lateral agreements in medical tourism: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives from the UK and India
title_full_unstemmed The potential for bi-lateral agreements in medical tourism: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives from the UK and India
title_short The potential for bi-lateral agreements in medical tourism: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives from the UK and India
title_sort potential for bi lateral agreements in medical tourism a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives from the uk and india
url http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/7/1/11
work_keys_str_mv AT smithrichardd thepotentialforbilateralagreementsinmedicaltourismaqualitativestudyofstakeholderperspectivesfromtheukandindia
AT chandarupa thepotentialforbilateralagreementsinmedicaltourismaqualitativestudyofstakeholderperspectivesfromtheukandindia
AT martinezalvarezmelisa thepotentialforbilateralagreementsinmedicaltourismaqualitativestudyofstakeholderperspectivesfromtheukandindia
AT smithrichardd potentialforbilateralagreementsinmedicaltourismaqualitativestudyofstakeholderperspectivesfromtheukandindia
AT chandarupa potentialforbilateralagreementsinmedicaltourismaqualitativestudyofstakeholderperspectivesfromtheukandindia
AT martinezalvarezmelisa potentialforbilateralagreementsinmedicaltourismaqualitativestudyofstakeholderperspectivesfromtheukandindia