An integrated psychology of (animalistic) dehumanization requires a focus on human-animal relations
Relative to the study of prejudice and stereotyping, the systematic study of how we animalize outgroup members is a newcomer to the study of intergroup relations. With remarkable gains made in the last two decades, the field is now represented by distinct methods and approaches emphasized across cam...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622723000448 |
| _version_ | 1797391785393127424 |
|---|---|
| author | Gordon Hodson Kristof Dhont |
| author_facet | Gordon Hodson Kristof Dhont |
| author_sort | Gordon Hodson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Relative to the study of prejudice and stereotyping, the systematic study of how we animalize outgroup members is a newcomer to the study of intergroup relations. With remarkable gains made in the last two decades, the field is now represented by distinct methods and approaches emphasized across camps, with recent calls for conceptual integration (see this Special Issue). Our central contention is that the existing literature focuses too much on humans (and the psychological stripping away of humanness from targets) with insufficient attention to animals, particularly regarding how we think about and treat animals (i.e., human-animal relations). How and why we animalize other people is systematically linked to how we overvalue humans relative to other animals; dehumanization of other people carries its sting and clout because animals are disregarded or exploited as entities deserving less protection and fewer rights relative to humans. We argue that the dehumanization field would benefit from this perspective, including the introduction of novel interventions, but also that the spillover benefits would help us to better understand human nature and our future challenges. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T23:37:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5f6955462fa843469cd6955cba628c39 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2666-6227 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T23:37:43Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology |
| spelling | doaj.art-5f6955462fa843469cd6955cba628c392023-12-14T05:23:54ZengElsevierCurrent Research in Ecological and Social Psychology2666-62272023-01-015100131An integrated psychology of (animalistic) dehumanization requires a focus on human-animal relationsGordon Hodson0Kristof Dhont1Department of Psychology, Brock University, Canada; Corresponding author.School of Psychology, University of Kent, UKRelative to the study of prejudice and stereotyping, the systematic study of how we animalize outgroup members is a newcomer to the study of intergroup relations. With remarkable gains made in the last two decades, the field is now represented by distinct methods and approaches emphasized across camps, with recent calls for conceptual integration (see this Special Issue). Our central contention is that the existing literature focuses too much on humans (and the psychological stripping away of humanness from targets) with insufficient attention to animals, particularly regarding how we think about and treat animals (i.e., human-animal relations). How and why we animalize other people is systematically linked to how we overvalue humans relative to other animals; dehumanization of other people carries its sting and clout because animals are disregarded or exploited as entities deserving less protection and fewer rights relative to humans. We argue that the dehumanization field would benefit from this perspective, including the introduction of novel interventions, but also that the spillover benefits would help us to better understand human nature and our future challenges.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622723000448Animalistic dehumanizationHuman-animal relationsSpeciesism |
| spellingShingle | Gordon Hodson Kristof Dhont An integrated psychology of (animalistic) dehumanization requires a focus on human-animal relations Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology Animalistic dehumanization Human-animal relations Speciesism |
| title | An integrated psychology of (animalistic) dehumanization requires a focus on human-animal relations |
| title_full | An integrated psychology of (animalistic) dehumanization requires a focus on human-animal relations |
| title_fullStr | An integrated psychology of (animalistic) dehumanization requires a focus on human-animal relations |
| title_full_unstemmed | An integrated psychology of (animalistic) dehumanization requires a focus on human-animal relations |
| title_short | An integrated psychology of (animalistic) dehumanization requires a focus on human-animal relations |
| title_sort | integrated psychology of animalistic dehumanization requires a focus on human animal relations |
| topic | Animalistic dehumanization Human-animal relations Speciesism |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622723000448 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gordonhodson anintegratedpsychologyofanimalisticdehumanizationrequiresafocusonhumananimalrelations AT kristofdhont anintegratedpsychologyofanimalisticdehumanizationrequiresafocusonhumananimalrelations AT gordonhodson integratedpsychologyofanimalisticdehumanizationrequiresafocusonhumananimalrelations AT kristofdhont integratedpsychologyofanimalisticdehumanizationrequiresafocusonhumananimalrelations |