Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) performed with Propel and other mini-screws on the rate of tooth movement, pain/discomfort, periodontal health, anchorage loss, and root resorption in patients undergoing orthodontic re...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | Progress in Orthodontics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-020-00326-4 |
| _version_ | 1818120395408015360 |
|---|---|
| author | Cibelle Cristina Oliveira dos Santos Paulo Mecenas Mônica Lidia Santos de Castro Aragón David Normando |
| author_facet | Cibelle Cristina Oliveira dos Santos Paulo Mecenas Mônica Lidia Santos de Castro Aragón David Normando |
| author_sort | Cibelle Cristina Oliveira dos Santos |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) performed with Propel and other mini-screws on the rate of tooth movement, pain/discomfort, periodontal health, anchorage loss, and root resorption in patients undergoing orthodontic retraction compared to a control group. Materials and methods PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, LILACS, Google Scholar, Scopus, and OpenGrey were searched without restriction. A manual search was also carried out. Only randomized clinical trials (RCT) were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using RoB 2.0 and the certainty of evidence through the GRADE tool. Results Among the twelve RCTs reviewed, five used the Propel system. Overall, the RoB was classified as low (4), moderate (5), and high (3). Two RCTs with moderate and one with a low RoB using the Propel system reported mild increases on rate of tooth movement associated with MOPs. One RCT with a moderate and another with high RoB did not find a significant effect of Propel on orthodontic movement. Regarding tooth movement, a subgroup meta-analysis found no differences between control and Propel movement (95% CI = − 0.01 to 0.75) or other mini-screws (− 0.02 to 0.31) related to rate of tooth movement per month. There was no effect of MOPs on root resorption, periodontal health, anchorage loss, and a mild effect on pain and oral health related to quality of life regardless of mini-screw type. The level of certainty was graded as low for the rate of tooth movement and pain/discomfort, as moderate for anchorage loss, and high for root resorption. Conclusion A low certainty of evidence supports that MOPs performed with Propel seem to have no significant effect on the rate of tooth movement. Moreover, this intervention does not seem to cause an increase in root resorption, periodontal heath, pain/discomfort, or anchorage loss. Thus, the Propel system does not appear to produce different results from those observed for other mini-screws. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T05:25:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5f823911fbcc47769bc1795990554828 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2196-1042 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T05:25:25Z |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Progress in Orthodontics |
| spelling | doaj.art-5f823911fbcc47769bc17959905548282022-12-22T01:19:35ZengSpringerOpenProgress in Orthodontics2196-10422020-07-0121111510.1186/s40510-020-00326-4Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysisCibelle Cristina Oliveira dos Santos0Paulo Mecenas1Mônica Lidia Santos de Castro Aragón2David Normando3Post-graduation program of dentistry, Federal University of Pará (UFPA)Post-graduation program of dentistry, Federal University of Pará (UFPA)Post-graduation program of dentistry, Federal University of Pará (UFPA)Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Federal University of Pará (UFPA)Abstract Background The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) performed with Propel and other mini-screws on the rate of tooth movement, pain/discomfort, periodontal health, anchorage loss, and root resorption in patients undergoing orthodontic retraction compared to a control group. Materials and methods PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, LILACS, Google Scholar, Scopus, and OpenGrey were searched without restriction. A manual search was also carried out. Only randomized clinical trials (RCT) were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using RoB 2.0 and the certainty of evidence through the GRADE tool. Results Among the twelve RCTs reviewed, five used the Propel system. Overall, the RoB was classified as low (4), moderate (5), and high (3). Two RCTs with moderate and one with a low RoB using the Propel system reported mild increases on rate of tooth movement associated with MOPs. One RCT with a moderate and another with high RoB did not find a significant effect of Propel on orthodontic movement. Regarding tooth movement, a subgroup meta-analysis found no differences between control and Propel movement (95% CI = − 0.01 to 0.75) or other mini-screws (− 0.02 to 0.31) related to rate of tooth movement per month. There was no effect of MOPs on root resorption, periodontal health, anchorage loss, and a mild effect on pain and oral health related to quality of life regardless of mini-screw type. The level of certainty was graded as low for the rate of tooth movement and pain/discomfort, as moderate for anchorage loss, and high for root resorption. Conclusion A low certainty of evidence supports that MOPs performed with Propel seem to have no significant effect on the rate of tooth movement. Moreover, this intervention does not seem to cause an increase in root resorption, periodontal heath, pain/discomfort, or anchorage loss. Thus, the Propel system does not appear to produce different results from those observed for other mini-screws.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-020-00326-4Canine retractionTooth movement techniquesMicro-osteoperforationMOPsOrthodontics |
| spellingShingle | Cibelle Cristina Oliveira dos Santos Paulo Mecenas Mônica Lidia Santos de Castro Aragón David Normando Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis Progress in Orthodontics Canine retraction Tooth movement techniques Micro-osteoperforation MOPs Orthodontics |
| title | Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full | Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_short | Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_sort | effects of micro osteoperforations performed with propel system on tooth movement pain quality of life anchorage loss and root resorption a systematic review and meta analysis |
| topic | Canine retraction Tooth movement techniques Micro-osteoperforation MOPs Orthodontics |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-020-00326-4 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cibellecristinaoliveiradossantos effectsofmicroosteoperforationsperformedwithpropelsystemontoothmovementpainqualityoflifeanchoragelossandrootresorptionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT paulomecenas effectsofmicroosteoperforationsperformedwithpropelsystemontoothmovementpainqualityoflifeanchoragelossandrootresorptionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT monicalidiasantosdecastroaragon effectsofmicroosteoperforationsperformedwithpropelsystemontoothmovementpainqualityoflifeanchoragelossandrootresorptionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT davidnormando effectsofmicroosteoperforationsperformedwithpropelsystemontoothmovementpainqualityoflifeanchoragelossandrootresorptionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |