The priority of Democratic Egalitarianism
<p>In this paper, I will show that strict versions of Luck Egalitarianism and Democratic Egalitarianism are implausible since both claim that the object of egalitarian justice should single out one and only one value. On the contrary, weak versions are acceptable since they allow a plural comp...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
2016-04-01
|
| Series: | Revista de Filosofia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RESF/article/view/52108 |
| Summary: | <p>In this paper, I will show that strict versions of Luck Egalitarianism and Democratic Egalitarianism are implausible since both claim that the object of egalitarian justice should single out one and only one value. On the contrary, weak versions are acceptable since they allow a plural composition of the egalitarian justice object.</p><p>This plural understanding of the object of egalitarian justice demands the justification of normative priorities since each conception would justify conflictive demands. In this article I will make three arguments to justify the normative priority of Democratic Egalitarianism over Luck Egalitarianism: a purely instrumentalone, another concerning expressive meaning of public policies and one last argument will show why we need a division of egalitarian moral work.</p> |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0034-8244 1988-284X |