Development and validation of a screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) for use among university students
Abstract Background The screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) consists of a 5-item self-reported questionnaire on the key features of BPD from the DSM-5 using a 5-point Likert scale. This study investigated its validity and reliability in screening for BPD in university...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-020-02807-6 |
_version_ | 1819009950938038272 |
---|---|
author | Trustsavin Lohanan Thanakorn Leesawat Tinakon Wongpakaran Nahathai Wongpakaran Nuntaporn Karawekpanyawong Awirut Oon-Arom Pimolpun Kuntawong |
author_facet | Trustsavin Lohanan Thanakorn Leesawat Tinakon Wongpakaran Nahathai Wongpakaran Nuntaporn Karawekpanyawong Awirut Oon-Arom Pimolpun Kuntawong |
author_sort | Trustsavin Lohanan |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) consists of a 5-item self-reported questionnaire on the key features of BPD from the DSM-5 using a 5-point Likert scale. This study investigated its validity and reliability in screening for BPD in university students. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of university students in Thailand between November and December 2019. An online assessment gathered demographic data and results from the SI-Bord, the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Participants whose SI-Bord scores were ≥ 1 were randomly selected to be interviewed and assessed for a BPD diagnosis by four psychiatrists using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II) as a reference point. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.925 (95% CI, 0.805–0.979) ensured inter-rater reliability between the four psychiatrists. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the SI-Bord, as compared to that of the SCID-II, were determined to indicate the cut-off score. The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) was analyzed to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy. Results The study included 342 students aged 18–25 years (the mean age was 20.25 ± 1.4 years), 80.4% of whom were female. Among the 68 participants selected for an online interview, 16 were diagnosed with BPD. The cut-off score of the SI-Bord was > 9, as suggested by the Youden index, yielding a sensitivity of 56.3% and a specificity of 92.3%. It had a positive predictive value of 69.2% and negative predictive value of 87.3%. The SI-Bord had adequate discriminative power between cases and non-cases of BPD, with the area under the ROC curve being 0.83. Cronbach’s alpha for the SI-Bord was 0.76, indicating acceptable internal consistency. The SI-Bord score was positively correlated to PHQ-9 and PSS-10 scores (r = 0.67 and r = 0.69, p < 0.001, respectively) and negatively correlated to MSPSS (r = − 0.50, p < 0.001). The prevalence of BPD in the sample was 6.4%, according to the cut-off score > 9. Conclusion The SI-Bord demonstrated good reliability and validity for screening BPD in university students. However, a study in non-Thai and other population groups should be warranted. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T01:04:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-5fb624768ca24233bc9b274373e5e7ed |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-244X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T01:04:31Z |
publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Psychiatry |
spelling | doaj.art-5fb624768ca24233bc9b274373e5e7ed2022-12-21T19:21:05ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2020-08-012011910.1186/s12888-020-02807-6Development and validation of a screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) for use among university studentsTrustsavin Lohanan0Thanakorn Leesawat1Tinakon Wongpakaran2Nahathai Wongpakaran3Nuntaporn Karawekpanyawong4Awirut Oon-Arom5Pimolpun Kuntawong6Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityAbstract Background The screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) consists of a 5-item self-reported questionnaire on the key features of BPD from the DSM-5 using a 5-point Likert scale. This study investigated its validity and reliability in screening for BPD in university students. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of university students in Thailand between November and December 2019. An online assessment gathered demographic data and results from the SI-Bord, the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Participants whose SI-Bord scores were ≥ 1 were randomly selected to be interviewed and assessed for a BPD diagnosis by four psychiatrists using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II) as a reference point. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.925 (95% CI, 0.805–0.979) ensured inter-rater reliability between the four psychiatrists. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the SI-Bord, as compared to that of the SCID-II, were determined to indicate the cut-off score. The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) was analyzed to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy. Results The study included 342 students aged 18–25 years (the mean age was 20.25 ± 1.4 years), 80.4% of whom were female. Among the 68 participants selected for an online interview, 16 were diagnosed with BPD. The cut-off score of the SI-Bord was > 9, as suggested by the Youden index, yielding a sensitivity of 56.3% and a specificity of 92.3%. It had a positive predictive value of 69.2% and negative predictive value of 87.3%. The SI-Bord had adequate discriminative power between cases and non-cases of BPD, with the area under the ROC curve being 0.83. Cronbach’s alpha for the SI-Bord was 0.76, indicating acceptable internal consistency. The SI-Bord score was positively correlated to PHQ-9 and PSS-10 scores (r = 0.67 and r = 0.69, p < 0.001, respectively) and negatively correlated to MSPSS (r = − 0.50, p < 0.001). The prevalence of BPD in the sample was 6.4%, according to the cut-off score > 9. Conclusion The SI-Bord demonstrated good reliability and validity for screening BPD in university students. However, a study in non-Thai and other population groups should be warranted.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-020-02807-6Borderline personality disorderScreeningValidationInstrumentUndergraduate |
spellingShingle | Trustsavin Lohanan Thanakorn Leesawat Tinakon Wongpakaran Nahathai Wongpakaran Nuntaporn Karawekpanyawong Awirut Oon-Arom Pimolpun Kuntawong Development and validation of a screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) for use among university students BMC Psychiatry Borderline personality disorder Screening Validation Instrument Undergraduate |
title | Development and validation of a screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) for use among university students |
title_full | Development and validation of a screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) for use among university students |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) for use among university students |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) for use among university students |
title_short | Development and validation of a screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) for use among university students |
title_sort | development and validation of a screening instrument for borderline personality disorder si bord for use among university students |
topic | Borderline personality disorder Screening Validation Instrument Undergraduate |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-020-02807-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trustsavinlohanan developmentandvalidationofascreeninginstrumentforborderlinepersonalitydisordersibordforuseamonguniversitystudents AT thanakornleesawat developmentandvalidationofascreeninginstrumentforborderlinepersonalitydisordersibordforuseamonguniversitystudents AT tinakonwongpakaran developmentandvalidationofascreeninginstrumentforborderlinepersonalitydisordersibordforuseamonguniversitystudents AT nahathaiwongpakaran developmentandvalidationofascreeninginstrumentforborderlinepersonalitydisordersibordforuseamonguniversitystudents AT nuntapornkarawekpanyawong developmentandvalidationofascreeninginstrumentforborderlinepersonalitydisordersibordforuseamonguniversitystudents AT awirutoonarom developmentandvalidationofascreeninginstrumentforborderlinepersonalitydisordersibordforuseamonguniversitystudents AT pimolpunkuntawong developmentandvalidationofascreeninginstrumentforborderlinepersonalitydisordersibordforuseamonguniversitystudents |