Glocalization of bioethics

There appears to be a conflict between global bioethical principles and the local understanding and application of these principles, but this conflict has misleadingly been characterized through the east–west dichotomy. This dichotomy portrays bioethical principles as western and as alien to non-wes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Himani Bhakuni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:Global Bioethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/11287462.2022.2052603
_version_ 1818445559881531392
author Himani Bhakuni
author_facet Himani Bhakuni
author_sort Himani Bhakuni
collection DOAJ
description There appears to be a conflict between global bioethical principles and the local understanding and application of these principles, but this conflict has misleadingly been characterized through the east–west dichotomy. This dichotomy portrays bioethical principles as western and as alien to non-western cultures. In this paper, I present reasons to reject the east–west dichotomy. Using the discussion around the principle of informed consent as an example, I propose that while bioethical values are common, bioethical governance must display a certain flexibility akin to Aristotle’s metaphor about the Lesbian rule. Such flexibility combined with a deeper understanding of the lived experiences of bioethical subjects might lead to the purging of tensions between global and local, giving us Glocal Bioethics.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T19:33:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5fb937abfe9a41be9668556648636376
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1128-7462
1591-7398
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T19:33:46Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Global Bioethics
spelling doaj.art-5fb937abfe9a41be96685566486363762022-12-21T22:50:00ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Bioethics1128-74621591-73982022-12-01331657710.1080/11287462.2022.2052603Glocalization of bioethicsHimani Bhakuni0University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsThere appears to be a conflict between global bioethical principles and the local understanding and application of these principles, but this conflict has misleadingly been characterized through the east–west dichotomy. This dichotomy portrays bioethical principles as western and as alien to non-western cultures. In this paper, I present reasons to reject the east–west dichotomy. Using the discussion around the principle of informed consent as an example, I propose that while bioethical values are common, bioethical governance must display a certain flexibility akin to Aristotle’s metaphor about the Lesbian rule. Such flexibility combined with a deeper understanding of the lived experiences of bioethical subjects might lead to the purging of tensions between global and local, giving us Glocal Bioethics.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/11287462.2022.2052603Glocalizationglocal bioethicscultural differenceLesbian ruleinformed consent
spellingShingle Himani Bhakuni
Glocalization of bioethics
Global Bioethics
Glocalization
glocal bioethics
cultural difference
Lesbian rule
informed consent
title Glocalization of bioethics
title_full Glocalization of bioethics
title_fullStr Glocalization of bioethics
title_full_unstemmed Glocalization of bioethics
title_short Glocalization of bioethics
title_sort glocalization of bioethics
topic Glocalization
glocal bioethics
cultural difference
Lesbian rule
informed consent
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/11287462.2022.2052603
work_keys_str_mv AT himanibhakuni glocalizationofbioethics