The Proximal 5th Metatarsal Fracture: A Spectrum of Misunderstood Fractures

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Several different types of 5th metatarsal fractures exist and are treated with various methods of immobilization, weight bearing restrictions, and occasionally operative procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew T. Kingery MD, Manasa Kadiyala BS, Raymond J. Walls MD, FRCS(Tr&Orth), MFSEM, FAAOS, Philipp Leucht MD, Steven Rivero MD, Abhishek Ganta MD, Sanjit Konda MD, Kenneth A. Egol MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-12-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011423S00434
_version_ 1797375241393012736
author Matthew T. Kingery MD
Manasa Kadiyala BS
Raymond J. Walls MD, FRCS(Tr&Orth), MFSEM, FAAOS
Philipp Leucht MD
Steven Rivero MD
Abhishek Ganta MD
Sanjit Konda MD
Kenneth A. Egol MD
author_facet Matthew T. Kingery MD
Manasa Kadiyala BS
Raymond J. Walls MD, FRCS(Tr&Orth), MFSEM, FAAOS
Philipp Leucht MD
Steven Rivero MD
Abhishek Ganta MD
Sanjit Konda MD
Kenneth A. Egol MD
author_sort Matthew T. Kingery MD
collection DOAJ
description Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Several different types of 5th metatarsal fractures exist and are treated with various methods of immobilization, weight bearing restrictions, and occasionally operative procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between pseudo-Jones fractures (Zones 1 and 2 of the 5th MT base), True Jones fractures (Zone 3), and 5th MT shaft fractures. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to a single large, urban, academic medical center with any 5th MT fracture between 2012 and 2022. Inclusion criteria for this analysis included patient follow up until there was evidence of radiographic healing, clinical healing, or duration greater than one year following injury. Radiographs obtained at the initial presentation were reviewed and fracture patterns were categorized as either Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 3, or Shaft. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the effect of fracture type on the duration of healing when controlling for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and history of diabetes. 1,279 patients with 5th metatarsal fracture met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis (mean age 49.2 +/- 17.9 years). Overall, 5.2% were treated in a splint or cast, 67.5% in a CAM boot, 20.3% in a hard sole shoe, and 7.0% without immobilization. Results: 31.2% of patients were non-weight bearing, 8.1% partial weight bearing, and 60.7% weight bearing as tolerated. There was no difference in time to radiographic union (p=0.946) or time to clinical healing (p=0.520) between any of the fracture types. Similarly, there was no difference in the proportion of patients with incomplete radiographic healing at 6 months (p=0.310) and at 1 year after injury (p=0.552) based on the fracture type. Likewise, there was no difference in any clinical or radiographic healing parameter based on fracture type for patients treated operatively. Based on linear regression model, there was no difference in the time to clinical or radiographic healing when controlling for confounding factors. Conclusion: All commonly occurring 5th metatarsal fractures, including those of both the metatarsal base and the shaft, demonstrate similar times to clinical and radiographic healing.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:19:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5fba6ef75efc492bb14dbd622bc87a98
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2473-0114
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:19:25Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-5fba6ef75efc492bb14dbd622bc87a982023-12-26T21:04:14ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142023-12-01810.1177/2473011423S00434The Proximal 5th Metatarsal Fracture: A Spectrum of Misunderstood FracturesMatthew T. Kingery MDManasa Kadiyala BSRaymond J. Walls MD, FRCS(Tr&Orth), MFSEM, FAAOSPhilipp Leucht MDSteven Rivero MDAbhishek Ganta MDSanjit Konda MDKenneth A. Egol MDCategory: Midfoot/Forefoot; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Several different types of 5th metatarsal fractures exist and are treated with various methods of immobilization, weight bearing restrictions, and occasionally operative procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between pseudo-Jones fractures (Zones 1 and 2 of the 5th MT base), True Jones fractures (Zone 3), and 5th MT shaft fractures. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to a single large, urban, academic medical center with any 5th MT fracture between 2012 and 2022. Inclusion criteria for this analysis included patient follow up until there was evidence of radiographic healing, clinical healing, or duration greater than one year following injury. Radiographs obtained at the initial presentation were reviewed and fracture patterns were categorized as either Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 3, or Shaft. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the effect of fracture type on the duration of healing when controlling for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and history of diabetes. 1,279 patients with 5th metatarsal fracture met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis (mean age 49.2 +/- 17.9 years). Overall, 5.2% were treated in a splint or cast, 67.5% in a CAM boot, 20.3% in a hard sole shoe, and 7.0% without immobilization. Results: 31.2% of patients were non-weight bearing, 8.1% partial weight bearing, and 60.7% weight bearing as tolerated. There was no difference in time to radiographic union (p=0.946) or time to clinical healing (p=0.520) between any of the fracture types. Similarly, there was no difference in the proportion of patients with incomplete radiographic healing at 6 months (p=0.310) and at 1 year after injury (p=0.552) based on the fracture type. Likewise, there was no difference in any clinical or radiographic healing parameter based on fracture type for patients treated operatively. Based on linear regression model, there was no difference in the time to clinical or radiographic healing when controlling for confounding factors. Conclusion: All commonly occurring 5th metatarsal fractures, including those of both the metatarsal base and the shaft, demonstrate similar times to clinical and radiographic healing.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011423S00434
spellingShingle Matthew T. Kingery MD
Manasa Kadiyala BS
Raymond J. Walls MD, FRCS(Tr&Orth), MFSEM, FAAOS
Philipp Leucht MD
Steven Rivero MD
Abhishek Ganta MD
Sanjit Konda MD
Kenneth A. Egol MD
The Proximal 5th Metatarsal Fracture: A Spectrum of Misunderstood Fractures
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title The Proximal 5th Metatarsal Fracture: A Spectrum of Misunderstood Fractures
title_full The Proximal 5th Metatarsal Fracture: A Spectrum of Misunderstood Fractures
title_fullStr The Proximal 5th Metatarsal Fracture: A Spectrum of Misunderstood Fractures
title_full_unstemmed The Proximal 5th Metatarsal Fracture: A Spectrum of Misunderstood Fractures
title_short The Proximal 5th Metatarsal Fracture: A Spectrum of Misunderstood Fractures
title_sort proximal 5th metatarsal fracture a spectrum of misunderstood fractures
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011423S00434
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewtkingerymd theproximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT manasakadiyalabs theproximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT raymondjwallsmdfrcstrorthmfsemfaaos theproximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT philippleuchtmd theproximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT stevenriveromd theproximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT abhishekgantamd theproximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT sanjitkondamd theproximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT kennethaegolmd theproximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT matthewtkingerymd proximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT manasakadiyalabs proximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT raymondjwallsmdfrcstrorthmfsemfaaos proximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT philippleuchtmd proximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT stevenriveromd proximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT abhishekgantamd proximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT sanjitkondamd proximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures
AT kennethaegolmd proximal5thmetatarsalfractureaspectrumofmisunderstoodfractures