Differential attainment and recruitment to Intensive Care Medicine Training in the UK, 2018–2020

Abstract Background Differences exist among doctors in examination performance, clinical and academic career progression, and prevalence of performance assessment by professional regulatory bodies. Some of these differences have been reported in relation to individual characteristics. The purpose of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ascanio Tridente, Jack Parry-Jones, Shashi Chandrashekaraiah, Daniele Bryden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-09-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03732-w
_version_ 1828378377798549504
author Ascanio Tridente
Jack Parry-Jones
Shashi Chandrashekaraiah
Daniele Bryden
author_facet Ascanio Tridente
Jack Parry-Jones
Shashi Chandrashekaraiah
Daniele Bryden
author_sort Ascanio Tridente
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Differences exist among doctors in examination performance, clinical and academic career progression, and prevalence of performance assessment by professional regulatory bodies. Some of these differences have been reported in relation to individual characteristics. The purpose of this study is to establish whether any specific individual characteristics are associated with performance in selection for entry into specialty training in Intensive Care in the United Kingdom. Methods We evaluated data of 509 candidates from the national recruitment rounds of 2018/19 and 2019/20. The outcome evaluated was “success at interview". Variables reaching statistical significance at univariate logistic regression analysis were fed in the multivariable analysis to identify independent predictors of success, with additional exploratory analyses performed, where indicated. Results The candidates’ median age was 31.5 (interquartile range, IQR 30–33.7) years, 324 (63.7%) were male, 256 (50.3%) not married/in civil partnership, 6 (1.2%) pregnant. The majority (316, 62.1%) were White British, 99 (19.5%) of Asian background, other ethnicities represented less than 20% of the sample. Of the 509 candidates, 155 (30.5%) were Atheist, 140 (27.5%) Christian; most were heterosexual (440, 86.4%); 432 (84.9%) reported no disability, while 4 (0.8%) had a minor and 1 (0.2%) had a major disability; 432 (84.9%) candidates held a UK medical degree; 77 (15.1%) a non-UK degree. At univariate logistic regression analysis (LRA) multiple factors were found to be associated with a lower likelihood of success, the strongest being an international medical graduate (IMG, holding a non-UK medical degree); others were increasing age, male gender, being married, Asian or mixed ethnicity, specific religious beliefs (Buddhism, Islam and Hinduism). After feeding all factors significant at univariate analysis, the only two retained as independent predictors at multivariable regression were Asian ethnicity and holding a non-UK degree. Asian UK graduates success rate was 92.7%, comparable to the national average of 92.3%, the Asian IMGs success rate was significantly lower, at 45.5%. Conclusions As the imbalances seen within the candidates of Asian background are explained by considering the country of primary medical training, the variations in performance is likely to reflect differences in training systems and understanding of the UK NHS.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T08:26:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5fc895468ef844299124d4f647a5dba4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6920
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T08:26:04Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Education
spelling doaj.art-5fc895468ef844299124d4f647a5dba42022-12-22T02:04:04ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202022-09-012211910.1186/s12909-022-03732-wDifferential attainment and recruitment to Intensive Care Medicine Training in the UK, 2018–2020Ascanio Tridente0Jack Parry-Jones1Shashi Chandrashekaraiah2Daniele Bryden3Intensive Care Unit, Whiston Hospital, St Helens and Knowsley Teaching HospitalsIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of WalesIntensive Care Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Royal Preston HospitalIntensive Care Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustAbstract Background Differences exist among doctors in examination performance, clinical and academic career progression, and prevalence of performance assessment by professional regulatory bodies. Some of these differences have been reported in relation to individual characteristics. The purpose of this study is to establish whether any specific individual characteristics are associated with performance in selection for entry into specialty training in Intensive Care in the United Kingdom. Methods We evaluated data of 509 candidates from the national recruitment rounds of 2018/19 and 2019/20. The outcome evaluated was “success at interview". Variables reaching statistical significance at univariate logistic regression analysis were fed in the multivariable analysis to identify independent predictors of success, with additional exploratory analyses performed, where indicated. Results The candidates’ median age was 31.5 (interquartile range, IQR 30–33.7) years, 324 (63.7%) were male, 256 (50.3%) not married/in civil partnership, 6 (1.2%) pregnant. The majority (316, 62.1%) were White British, 99 (19.5%) of Asian background, other ethnicities represented less than 20% of the sample. Of the 509 candidates, 155 (30.5%) were Atheist, 140 (27.5%) Christian; most were heterosexual (440, 86.4%); 432 (84.9%) reported no disability, while 4 (0.8%) had a minor and 1 (0.2%) had a major disability; 432 (84.9%) candidates held a UK medical degree; 77 (15.1%) a non-UK degree. At univariate logistic regression analysis (LRA) multiple factors were found to be associated with a lower likelihood of success, the strongest being an international medical graduate (IMG, holding a non-UK medical degree); others were increasing age, male gender, being married, Asian or mixed ethnicity, specific religious beliefs (Buddhism, Islam and Hinduism). After feeding all factors significant at univariate analysis, the only two retained as independent predictors at multivariable regression were Asian ethnicity and holding a non-UK degree. Asian UK graduates success rate was 92.7%, comparable to the national average of 92.3%, the Asian IMGs success rate was significantly lower, at 45.5%. Conclusions As the imbalances seen within the candidates of Asian background are explained by considering the country of primary medical training, the variations in performance is likely to reflect differences in training systems and understanding of the UK NHS.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03732-wDifferential AttainmentIntensive Care Medicine TrainingDiscriminationBiasUnconscious BiasInternational Medical Graduate
spellingShingle Ascanio Tridente
Jack Parry-Jones
Shashi Chandrashekaraiah
Daniele Bryden
Differential attainment and recruitment to Intensive Care Medicine Training in the UK, 2018–2020
BMC Medical Education
Differential Attainment
Intensive Care Medicine Training
Discrimination
Bias
Unconscious Bias
International Medical Graduate
title Differential attainment and recruitment to Intensive Care Medicine Training in the UK, 2018–2020
title_full Differential attainment and recruitment to Intensive Care Medicine Training in the UK, 2018–2020
title_fullStr Differential attainment and recruitment to Intensive Care Medicine Training in the UK, 2018–2020
title_full_unstemmed Differential attainment and recruitment to Intensive Care Medicine Training in the UK, 2018–2020
title_short Differential attainment and recruitment to Intensive Care Medicine Training in the UK, 2018–2020
title_sort differential attainment and recruitment to intensive care medicine training in the uk 2018 2020
topic Differential Attainment
Intensive Care Medicine Training
Discrimination
Bias
Unconscious Bias
International Medical Graduate
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03732-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ascaniotridente differentialattainmentandrecruitmenttointensivecaremedicinetrainingintheuk20182020
AT jackparryjones differentialattainmentandrecruitmenttointensivecaremedicinetrainingintheuk20182020
AT shashichandrashekaraiah differentialattainmentandrecruitmenttointensivecaremedicinetrainingintheuk20182020
AT danielebryden differentialattainmentandrecruitmenttointensivecaremedicinetrainingintheuk20182020