Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Potato Growth, Yield, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies

Irrigation and nitrogen management are crucial for sustainable potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i> L.) production. A field experiment was conducted during the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons at Farmington, New Mexico, to evaluate the performance of two chip potato varieties (Lamoka and Waneta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bhimsen Shrestha, Blair L. Stringam, Murali K. Darapuneni, Kevin A. Lombard, Soumaila Sanogo, Charles Higgins, Koffi Djaman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-03-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/14/3/560
_version_ 1827307354663682048
author Bhimsen Shrestha
Blair L. Stringam
Murali K. Darapuneni
Kevin A. Lombard
Soumaila Sanogo
Charles Higgins
Koffi Djaman
author_facet Bhimsen Shrestha
Blair L. Stringam
Murali K. Darapuneni
Kevin A. Lombard
Soumaila Sanogo
Charles Higgins
Koffi Djaman
author_sort Bhimsen Shrestha
collection DOAJ
description Irrigation and nitrogen management are crucial for sustainable potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i> L.) production. A field experiment was conducted during the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons at Farmington, New Mexico, to evaluate the performance of two chip potato varieties (Lamoka and Waneta) under three irrigation regimes (full irrigation (FI), 20% deficit irrigation (DI) and 40% DI) and seven nitrogen fertilizer rates (0, 60, 115, 170, 220, 280, and 340 kg N/ha). The treatment combinations of irrigation regimes, nitrogen rates, and varieties were arranged in a split–split plot design with three replications as main plot, sub-plot, and sub-sub plot, respectively. The two-year results showed that irrigation regimes had the most significant effect on plant growth, physiology, and tuber yield of the potato varieties. For both Lamoka and Waneta, the plant height and canopy cover were lower under 40% DI than under 20% DI and FI treatments. The SPAD meter values were higher under 40% DI, followed by 20% DI and FI treatments, whereas the stomatal conductance was higher under FI, followed by 20% DI and 40% DI during both growing seasons. Regardless of nitrogen rates and variety, a 20% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced the total tuber yield by 4.5% and 22.1% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, while the 40% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced total tuber yield by 36.8% and 58.2% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, as compared to full irrigation. Shifting from full irrigation to 20% DI could save 711.2 to 1036.3 m<sup>3</sup>/ha of irrigation water. For Lamoka, the highest total tuber yield was obtained with 60 kg N/ha under 20% DI and 220 kg N/ha under FI in 2022 and 2023, respectively. For Waneta, the highest total tuber yield was obtained with 115 kg N/ha under 20% DI and 170 kg N/ha under FI in 2022 and 2023, respectively. Maximum water use efficiency (WUE) was obtained at 60 kg N/ha with 20% DI for both Lamoka and Waneta in 2022, while maximum WUE was obtained at 220 kg N/ha under FI for Lamoka and at 170 kg N/ha for Waneta in the 2023 season. The maximum nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) was achieved with 60 kg N/ha under 20% DI for both varieties during both growing seasons. Thus, for sustainable irrigation and nitrogen management, the application of a 20% deficit irrigation strategy with a lower nitrogen rate (60 to 170 kg N/ha) could be the best option to improve WUE and NUE with minimal tuber yield reduction. Our study suggested that 40% deficit irrigation would not be beneficial as compared to both full irrigation and 20% water-saving irrigation.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:38:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5fde7bee87b54c79b9e2c83056d373c6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:38:47Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-5fde7bee87b54c79b9e2c83056d373c62024-03-27T13:16:54ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952024-03-0114356010.3390/agronomy14030560Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Potato Growth, Yield, and Water and Nitrogen Use EfficienciesBhimsen Shrestha0Blair L. Stringam1Murali K. Darapuneni2Kevin A. Lombard3Soumaila Sanogo4Charles Higgins5Koffi Djaman6Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, 1780 E University Ave., Las Cruces, NM 88003, USADepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, 1780 E University Ave., Las Cruces, NM 88003, USADepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Rex E. Kirksey Agricultural Science Center at Tucumcari, 6502 Quay Road Am.5, Tucumcari, NM 88401, USADepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Agricultural Science Center at Farmington, Farmington, 300 Road 4063, Farmington, NM 87499, USADepartment of Entomology, Plant Pathology, and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, 1780 E University Ave., Las Cruces, NM 88003, USAHiggins Farms Inc., 4220 N. Crescent Ave., Farmington, NM 87401, USADepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Agricultural Science Center at Farmington, Farmington, 300 Road 4063, Farmington, NM 87499, USAIrrigation and nitrogen management are crucial for sustainable potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i> L.) production. A field experiment was conducted during the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons at Farmington, New Mexico, to evaluate the performance of two chip potato varieties (Lamoka and Waneta) under three irrigation regimes (full irrigation (FI), 20% deficit irrigation (DI) and 40% DI) and seven nitrogen fertilizer rates (0, 60, 115, 170, 220, 280, and 340 kg N/ha). The treatment combinations of irrigation regimes, nitrogen rates, and varieties were arranged in a split–split plot design with three replications as main plot, sub-plot, and sub-sub plot, respectively. The two-year results showed that irrigation regimes had the most significant effect on plant growth, physiology, and tuber yield of the potato varieties. For both Lamoka and Waneta, the plant height and canopy cover were lower under 40% DI than under 20% DI and FI treatments. The SPAD meter values were higher under 40% DI, followed by 20% DI and FI treatments, whereas the stomatal conductance was higher under FI, followed by 20% DI and 40% DI during both growing seasons. Regardless of nitrogen rates and variety, a 20% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced the total tuber yield by 4.5% and 22.1% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, while the 40% water-saving irrigation strategy reduced total tuber yield by 36.8% and 58.2% in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons, respectively, as compared to full irrigation. Shifting from full irrigation to 20% DI could save 711.2 to 1036.3 m<sup>3</sup>/ha of irrigation water. For Lamoka, the highest total tuber yield was obtained with 60 kg N/ha under 20% DI and 220 kg N/ha under FI in 2022 and 2023, respectively. For Waneta, the highest total tuber yield was obtained with 115 kg N/ha under 20% DI and 170 kg N/ha under FI in 2022 and 2023, respectively. Maximum water use efficiency (WUE) was obtained at 60 kg N/ha with 20% DI for both Lamoka and Waneta in 2022, while maximum WUE was obtained at 220 kg N/ha under FI for Lamoka and at 170 kg N/ha for Waneta in the 2023 season. The maximum nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) was achieved with 60 kg N/ha under 20% DI for both varieties during both growing seasons. Thus, for sustainable irrigation and nitrogen management, the application of a 20% deficit irrigation strategy with a lower nitrogen rate (60 to 170 kg N/ha) could be the best option to improve WUE and NUE with minimal tuber yield reduction. Our study suggested that 40% deficit irrigation would not be beneficial as compared to both full irrigation and 20% water-saving irrigation.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/14/3/560deficit irrigationnitrogenpotatoyieldwater use efficiency
spellingShingle Bhimsen Shrestha
Blair L. Stringam
Murali K. Darapuneni
Kevin A. Lombard
Soumaila Sanogo
Charles Higgins
Koffi Djaman
Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Potato Growth, Yield, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies
Agronomy
deficit irrigation
nitrogen
potato
yield
water use efficiency
title Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Potato Growth, Yield, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies
title_full Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Potato Growth, Yield, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies
title_fullStr Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Potato Growth, Yield, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Potato Growth, Yield, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies
title_short Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Potato Growth, Yield, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies
title_sort effect of irrigation and nitrogen management on potato growth yield and water and nitrogen use efficiencies
topic deficit irrigation
nitrogen
potato
yield
water use efficiency
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/14/3/560
work_keys_str_mv AT bhimsenshrestha effectofirrigationandnitrogenmanagementonpotatogrowthyieldandwaterandnitrogenuseefficiencies
AT blairlstringam effectofirrigationandnitrogenmanagementonpotatogrowthyieldandwaterandnitrogenuseefficiencies
AT muralikdarapuneni effectofirrigationandnitrogenmanagementonpotatogrowthyieldandwaterandnitrogenuseefficiencies
AT kevinalombard effectofirrigationandnitrogenmanagementonpotatogrowthyieldandwaterandnitrogenuseefficiencies
AT soumailasanogo effectofirrigationandnitrogenmanagementonpotatogrowthyieldandwaterandnitrogenuseefficiencies
AT charleshiggins effectofirrigationandnitrogenmanagementonpotatogrowthyieldandwaterandnitrogenuseefficiencies
AT koffidjaman effectofirrigationandnitrogenmanagementonpotatogrowthyieldandwaterandnitrogenuseefficiencies