Comparing the quality of crowdsourced data contributed by expert and non-experts.
There is currently a lack of in-situ environmental data for the calibration and validation of remotely sensed products and for the development and verification of models. Crowdsourcing is increasingly being seen as one potentially powerful way of increasing the supply of in-situ data but there are a...
Main Authors: | Linda See, Alexis Comber, Carl Salk, Steffen Fritz, Marijn van der Velde, Christoph Perger, Christian Schill, Ian McCallum, Florian Kraxner, Michael Obersteiner |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3729953?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Geo-Wiki.Org: The Use of Crowdsourcing to Improve Global Land Cover
by: Florian Kraxner, et al.
Published: (2009-08-01) -
An Exploration of Some Pitfalls of Thematic Map Assessment Using the New Map Tools Resource
by: Carl Salk, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Geography Geo-Wiki in the Classroom: Using Crowdsourcing to Enhance Geographical Teaching
by: Christoph Perger, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01) -
How many people need to classify the same image? A method for optimizing volunteer contributions in binary geographical classifications.
by: Carl Salk, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'
by: McCallum Ian, et al.
Published: (2009-08-01)