A bibliometric analysis of the Machiavellianism in domestic and foreign psychology

This study conducted bibliometric analysis of 214 national and 1847 foreign research papers in the Machiavellianism field, presenting the research status, evolution process and main research themes in a visual form to clarify the overall knowledge structure of Machiavellianism research. The results...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Filippou O.Yu.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2020-12-01
Series:Современная зарубежная психология
Subjects:
Online Access:https://psyjournals.ru/files/118510/jmfp_2020_n4_Filippou.pdf
_version_ 1818325689170919424
author Filippou O.Yu.
author_facet Filippou O.Yu.
author_sort Filippou O.Yu.
collection DOAJ
description This study conducted bibliometric analysis of 214 national and 1847 foreign research papers in the Machiavellianism field, presenting the research status, evolution process and main research themes in a visual form to clarify the overall knowledge structure of Machiavellianism research. The results of the study showed that between 2013 and 2019 there was a significant increase of interest among scholars the world around in issues related to the concept of Machiavellianism. The number of published research papers over the recent six years are roughly equal in the number of papers released between 1970 and 2012. Also, the dark triad, behavior and traits covered the largest number of keywords. In recent years, some new trends have emerged in Machiavellianism research. The interest of the world scientific community has mainly focused on the “dark” side of Machiavellianism. The dark dozen, sadism, moral disunity, cyberbullying, and depression reflect the current hot themes associated with Machiavellianism research. It has also become obvious that despite significant efforts to develop the study of Machiavellianism, the current research is not sufficient. In general, the results of the study contribute to understanding of the relationship between the concept of Machiavellianism and other concepts of psychology, expand knowledge about the evolution process of the Machiavellianism field and possible directions for future trends.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T11:48:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5fe67a5a9692468087117bd9f14ec070
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-4977
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-12-13T11:48:28Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
record_format Article
series Современная зарубежная психология
spelling doaj.art-5fe67a5a9692468087117bd9f14ec0702022-12-21T23:47:27ZrusMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationСовременная зарубежная психология2304-49772020-12-0112012810.17759/jmfp.2020090411A bibliometric analysis of the Machiavellianism in domestic and foreign psychologyFilippou O.Yu.0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9377-3250Psychologist of School № 2116This study conducted bibliometric analysis of 214 national and 1847 foreign research papers in the Machiavellianism field, presenting the research status, evolution process and main research themes in a visual form to clarify the overall knowledge structure of Machiavellianism research. The results of the study showed that between 2013 and 2019 there was a significant increase of interest among scholars the world around in issues related to the concept of Machiavellianism. The number of published research papers over the recent six years are roughly equal in the number of papers released between 1970 and 2012. Also, the dark triad, behavior and traits covered the largest number of keywords. In recent years, some new trends have emerged in Machiavellianism research. The interest of the world scientific community has mainly focused on the “dark” side of Machiavellianism. The dark dozen, sadism, moral disunity, cyberbullying, and depression reflect the current hot themes associated with Machiavellianism research. It has also become obvious that despite significant efforts to develop the study of Machiavellianism, the current research is not sufficient. In general, the results of the study contribute to understanding of the relationship between the concept of Machiavellianism and other concepts of psychology, expand knowledge about the evolution process of the Machiavellianism field and possible directions for future trends.https://psyjournals.ru/files/118510/jmfp_2020_n4_Filippou.pdfmachiavellianismbibliometric analysisсo-word analysissocial network analysis concept evolutiontendencieshistcitevosviewer
spellingShingle Filippou O.Yu.
A bibliometric analysis of the Machiavellianism in domestic and foreign psychology
Современная зарубежная психология
machiavellianism
bibliometric analysis
сo-word analysis
social network analysis concept evolution
tendencies
histcite
vosviewer
title A bibliometric analysis of the Machiavellianism in domestic and foreign psychology
title_full A bibliometric analysis of the Machiavellianism in domestic and foreign psychology
title_fullStr A bibliometric analysis of the Machiavellianism in domestic and foreign psychology
title_full_unstemmed A bibliometric analysis of the Machiavellianism in domestic and foreign psychology
title_short A bibliometric analysis of the Machiavellianism in domestic and foreign psychology
title_sort bibliometric analysis of the machiavellianism in domestic and foreign psychology
topic machiavellianism
bibliometric analysis
сo-word analysis
social network analysis concept evolution
tendencies
histcite
vosviewer
url https://psyjournals.ru/files/118510/jmfp_2020_n4_Filippou.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT filippouoyu abibliometricanalysisofthemachiavellianismindomesticandforeignpsychology
AT filippouoyu bibliometricanalysisofthemachiavellianismindomesticandforeignpsychology