Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique
This paper presents a comparison of surface morphology obtained after machining Inconel 718 by the conventional insert, by Wiper insert and by using the cutting insert made by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS). The shape of the special insert was obtained by employing Wire Electrical Discharge Machining...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Materials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/16/3/949 |
_version_ | 1797623984177545216 |
---|---|
author | Piotr Szablewski Stanisław Legutko Adrian Mróz Dariusz Garbiec Rafał Czajka Krzysztof Smak Bartłomiej Krawczyk |
author_facet | Piotr Szablewski Stanisław Legutko Adrian Mróz Dariusz Garbiec Rafał Czajka Krzysztof Smak Bartłomiej Krawczyk |
author_sort | Piotr Szablewski |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This paper presents a comparison of surface morphology obtained after machining Inconel 718 by the conventional insert, by Wiper insert and by using the cutting insert made by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS). The shape of the special insert was obtained by employing Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (WEDM). The paper focuses on the description of surface topography after turning in dry and wet conditions. The performed investigation included longitudinal turning tests of Inconel 718 performed in a range of variable feeds. Surface topography measurements have been performed with the application of Nanoscan 855. The performed analysis includes a parametric evaluation of the obtained surfaces. With the Wiper insert, the <i>Sa</i> surface roughness parameter was obtained below 0.6 µm in the whole range of used feed rates. The surface roughness parameter <i>Sa</i> measured on the surface after machining by special insert depends on the cutting conditions (wet and dry machining). After, the dry machining parameter <i>Sa</i>, similar to the Wiper insert, was below 0.6 µm in the whole range of used feed rates. Unfortunately, cutting Inconel 718 using special insert with feed rate <i>f</i> = 0.25 mm/rev and cooling generated a surface with <i>Sa</i> parameter over 2 times higher than for the same feed rate without cooling, while this parameter, after turning by conventional insert, increases over 4 times using feed rate <i>f</i> = 0.25 mm/rev compared to feed rate <i>f</i> = 0.05 mm/rev during machining with cooling. This ratio is lower for conventional insert in dry machining because of sticking, which arises at the smallest feed rate according to previous research. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T09:36:28Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-5feab7e13f7a410b9db6a14d92f9d93b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1996-1944 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T09:36:28Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Materials |
spelling | doaj.art-5feab7e13f7a410b9db6a14d92f9d93b2023-11-16T17:15:01ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442023-01-0116394910.3390/ma16030949Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS TechniquePiotr Szablewski0Stanisław Legutko1Adrian Mróz2Dariusz Garbiec3Rafał Czajka4Krzysztof Smak5Bartłomiej Krawczyk6Pratt & Whitney Kalisz, 4a Elektryczna Street, 62-800 Kalisz, PolandFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 3 Piotrowo Street, 60-965 Poznan, PolandInstitute of Gears Research Excellence Center, The President Stanislaw Wojciechowski Calisia University, 4 Nowy Świat Street, 62-800 Kalisz, PolandŁukasiewicz Research Network—Poznań Institute of Technology, 6 Ewarysta Estkowskiego St., 61-755 Poznan, PolandInstitute of Gears Research Excellence Center, The President Stanislaw Wojciechowski Calisia University, 4 Nowy Świat Street, 62-800 Kalisz, PolandPratt & Whitney Kalisz, 4a Elektryczna Street, 62-800 Kalisz, PolandPratt & Whitney Kalisz, 4a Elektryczna Street, 62-800 Kalisz, PolandThis paper presents a comparison of surface morphology obtained after machining Inconel 718 by the conventional insert, by Wiper insert and by using the cutting insert made by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS). The shape of the special insert was obtained by employing Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (WEDM). The paper focuses on the description of surface topography after turning in dry and wet conditions. The performed investigation included longitudinal turning tests of Inconel 718 performed in a range of variable feeds. Surface topography measurements have been performed with the application of Nanoscan 855. The performed analysis includes a parametric evaluation of the obtained surfaces. With the Wiper insert, the <i>Sa</i> surface roughness parameter was obtained below 0.6 µm in the whole range of used feed rates. The surface roughness parameter <i>Sa</i> measured on the surface after machining by special insert depends on the cutting conditions (wet and dry machining). After, the dry machining parameter <i>Sa</i>, similar to the Wiper insert, was below 0.6 µm in the whole range of used feed rates. Unfortunately, cutting Inconel 718 using special insert with feed rate <i>f</i> = 0.25 mm/rev and cooling generated a surface with <i>Sa</i> parameter over 2 times higher than for the same feed rate without cooling, while this parameter, after turning by conventional insert, increases over 4 times using feed rate <i>f</i> = 0.25 mm/rev compared to feed rate <i>f</i> = 0.05 mm/rev during machining with cooling. This ratio is lower for conventional insert in dry machining because of sticking, which arises at the smallest feed rate according to previous research.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/16/3/949Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS)Inconel 718Wiperdry machiningsurface quality |
spellingShingle | Piotr Szablewski Stanisław Legutko Adrian Mróz Dariusz Garbiec Rafał Czajka Krzysztof Smak Bartłomiej Krawczyk Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique Materials Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) Inconel 718 Wiper dry machining surface quality |
title | Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique |
title_full | Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique |
title_fullStr | Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique |
title_short | Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique |
title_sort | surface topography description after turning inconel 718 with a conventional wiper and special insert made by the sps technique |
topic | Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) Inconel 718 Wiper dry machining surface quality |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/16/3/949 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piotrszablewski surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique AT stanisławlegutko surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique AT adrianmroz surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique AT dariuszgarbiec surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique AT rafałczajka surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique AT krzysztofsmak surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique AT bartłomiejkrawczyk surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique |