Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial

Objective: To investigate the effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Retrolaminar Block (RLB) on intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients with Multiple Rib Fractures (MRFs). Methods: A total of 80 MRFs patients were randomly divided into the ESPB (Group E) and RLB (Group R) groups. A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yaoping Zhao, Yan Tao, Shaoqiang Zheng, Nan Cai, Long Cheng, Hao Xie, Geng Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-01-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421001548
_version_ 1818018030997733376
author Yaoping Zhao
Yan Tao
Shaoqiang Zheng
Nan Cai
Long Cheng
Hao Xie
Geng Wang
author_facet Yaoping Zhao
Yan Tao
Shaoqiang Zheng
Nan Cai
Long Cheng
Hao Xie
Geng Wang
author_sort Yaoping Zhao
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To investigate the effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Retrolaminar Block (RLB) on intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients with Multiple Rib Fractures (MRFs). Methods: A total of 80 MRFs patients were randomly divided into the ESPB (Group E) and RLB (Group R) groups. After general anesthesia, ESPB and RLB were performed under ultrasound guidance, respectively, together with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA). Results: Thirty-four cases in Group E and 33,cases in Group R showed unclear paravertebral spaces. The intraoperative dosage of remifentanil (mean ± SD) (392.8 ± 118.7 vs. 501.7 ± 190.0 μg) and postoperative morphine PCIA dosage, (7.35 ± 1.55 vs. 14.73 ± 2.18 mg) in Group R were significantly less than those in Group E; the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores in Group R at 2 (2.7 ± 1.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4), 4 (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 0.9), 12 (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 3.0 ± 0.8), and 24 hours (2.6 ± 1.0 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9) after surgery were significantly lower than those in Group E. Finally, the normal respiratory diaphragm activity (2.17 ± 0.22 vs. 2.05 ± 0.19), pH (median [IQR] (7.38 [7.31–7.45] vs. 7.36 [7.30–7.42]), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) (44 [35–49] vs. 42.5 [30–46]) after the operation in Group R were significantly better than those in Group E (p < 0.05). Conclusions: RLB was a more effective analgesic method than ESPB in the treatment of MRF.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T07:33:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5ff62cf7b98c4ea0a54e12d8fdfa3685
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0104-0014
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T07:33:55Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-5ff62cf7b98c4ea0a54e12d8fdfa36852022-12-22T02:05:44ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology0104-00142022-01-01721115121Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trialYaoping Zhao0Yan Tao1Shaoqiang Zheng2Nan Cai3Long Cheng4Hao Xie5Geng Wang6Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China; Corresponding author.Objective: To investigate the effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Retrolaminar Block (RLB) on intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients with Multiple Rib Fractures (MRFs). Methods: A total of 80 MRFs patients were randomly divided into the ESPB (Group E) and RLB (Group R) groups. After general anesthesia, ESPB and RLB were performed under ultrasound guidance, respectively, together with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA). Results: Thirty-four cases in Group E and 33,cases in Group R showed unclear paravertebral spaces. The intraoperative dosage of remifentanil (mean ± SD) (392.8 ± 118.7 vs. 501.7 ± 190.0 μg) and postoperative morphine PCIA dosage, (7.35 ± 1.55 vs. 14.73 ± 2.18 mg) in Group R were significantly less than those in Group E; the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores in Group R at 2 (2.7 ± 1.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4), 4 (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 0.9), 12 (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 3.0 ± 0.8), and 24 hours (2.6 ± 1.0 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9) after surgery were significantly lower than those in Group E. Finally, the normal respiratory diaphragm activity (2.17 ± 0.22 vs. 2.05 ± 0.19), pH (median [IQR] (7.38 [7.31–7.45] vs. 7.36 [7.30–7.42]), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) (44 [35–49] vs. 42.5 [30–46]) after the operation in Group R were significantly better than those in Group E (p < 0.05). Conclusions: RLB was a more effective analgesic method than ESPB in the treatment of MRF.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421001548Clinical trialRib fracturesNerve blockUltrasound imagingAnalgesia
spellingShingle Yaoping Zhao
Yan Tao
Shaoqiang Zheng
Nan Cai
Long Cheng
Hao Xie
Geng Wang
Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Clinical trial
Rib fractures
Nerve block
Ultrasound imaging
Analgesia
title Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
title_full Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
title_fullStr Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
title_short Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
title_sort effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures a randomized double blinded clinical trial
topic Clinical trial
Rib fractures
Nerve block
Ultrasound imaging
Analgesia
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421001548
work_keys_str_mv AT yaopingzhao effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT yantao effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT shaoqiangzheng effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT nancai effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT longcheng effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT haoxie effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT gengwang effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial