Perceived usefulness and ease of use of fundoscopy by medical students: a randomised crossover trial of six technologies (eFOCUS 1)

Abstract Background Fundoscopy outside ophthalmology is in decline, and the technical demands of the traditional direct ophthalmoscope examination are likely contributing. Alternative fundoscopy technologies are increasingly available, yet valid comparisons between fundoscopy technologies are lackin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. P. Dunn, C. J. Kang, S. Marks, J. L. Witherow, S. M. Dunn, P. R. Healey, A. J. White
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02469-8
_version_ 1818613509798232064
author H. P. Dunn
C. J. Kang
S. Marks
J. L. Witherow
S. M. Dunn
P. R. Healey
A. J. White
author_facet H. P. Dunn
C. J. Kang
S. Marks
J. L. Witherow
S. M. Dunn
P. R. Healey
A. J. White
author_sort H. P. Dunn
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Fundoscopy outside ophthalmology is in decline, and the technical demands of the traditional direct ophthalmoscope examination are likely contributing. Alternative fundoscopy technologies are increasingly available, yet valid comparisons between fundoscopy technologies are lacking. We aimed to assess medical students’ perceptions of usefulness and ease of use of traditional and contemporary fundus-viewing technologies including smartphone fundoscopy. Methods One hundred forty-six second-year medical students participated in a cross-sectional, randomised, cross-over study of fundoscopy methods. Medical students completed small group training sessions using six current fundoscopy technologies including: a non-mydriatic fundus camera; two types of direct fundoscopy; and three types of smartphone fundoscopy. A novel survey of perceived usefulness and ease of use was then completed by students. Results Repeated-measures ANOVA found students rated both the perceived usefulness (p< 0.001) and ease of use (p< 0.001) of smartphone fundoscopy significantly higher than both the non-mydriatic camera and direct fundoscopy. Conclusions Smartphone fundoscopy was found to be significantly more useful and easier to use than other modalities. Educators should optimise student access to novel fundoscopy technologies such as smartphone fundoscopy which may mitigate the technical challenges of fundoscopy and reinvigorate use of this valuable clinical examination.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T16:03:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5ff79577d81e425d9ad11077ebe00431
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6920
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T16:03:15Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Education
spelling doaj.art-5ff79577d81e425d9ad11077ebe004312022-12-21T22:25:25ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202021-01-012111910.1186/s12909-020-02469-8Perceived usefulness and ease of use of fundoscopy by medical students: a randomised crossover trial of six technologies (eFOCUS 1)H. P. Dunn0C. J. Kang1S. Marks2J. L. Witherow3S. M. Dunn4P. R. Healey5A. J. White6Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of SydneyFaculty of Medicine & Health, University of SydneyFaculty of Medicine & Health, University of SydneyDiscipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Services, Macquarie UniversityFaculty of Medicine & Health, University of SydneyFaculty of Medicine & Health, University of SydneyFaculty of Medicine & Health, University of SydneyAbstract Background Fundoscopy outside ophthalmology is in decline, and the technical demands of the traditional direct ophthalmoscope examination are likely contributing. Alternative fundoscopy technologies are increasingly available, yet valid comparisons between fundoscopy technologies are lacking. We aimed to assess medical students’ perceptions of usefulness and ease of use of traditional and contemporary fundus-viewing technologies including smartphone fundoscopy. Methods One hundred forty-six second-year medical students participated in a cross-sectional, randomised, cross-over study of fundoscopy methods. Medical students completed small group training sessions using six current fundoscopy technologies including: a non-mydriatic fundus camera; two types of direct fundoscopy; and three types of smartphone fundoscopy. A novel survey of perceived usefulness and ease of use was then completed by students. Results Repeated-measures ANOVA found students rated both the perceived usefulness (p< 0.001) and ease of use (p< 0.001) of smartphone fundoscopy significantly higher than both the non-mydriatic camera and direct fundoscopy. Conclusions Smartphone fundoscopy was found to be significantly more useful and easier to use than other modalities. Educators should optimise student access to novel fundoscopy technologies such as smartphone fundoscopy which may mitigate the technical challenges of fundoscopy and reinvigorate use of this valuable clinical examination.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02469-8FundoscopySmartphoneEducationNon mydriatic cameraDirect ophthalmoscope
spellingShingle H. P. Dunn
C. J. Kang
S. Marks
J. L. Witherow
S. M. Dunn
P. R. Healey
A. J. White
Perceived usefulness and ease of use of fundoscopy by medical students: a randomised crossover trial of six technologies (eFOCUS 1)
BMC Medical Education
Fundoscopy
Smartphone
Education
Non mydriatic camera
Direct ophthalmoscope
title Perceived usefulness and ease of use of fundoscopy by medical students: a randomised crossover trial of six technologies (eFOCUS 1)
title_full Perceived usefulness and ease of use of fundoscopy by medical students: a randomised crossover trial of six technologies (eFOCUS 1)
title_fullStr Perceived usefulness and ease of use of fundoscopy by medical students: a randomised crossover trial of six technologies (eFOCUS 1)
title_full_unstemmed Perceived usefulness and ease of use of fundoscopy by medical students: a randomised crossover trial of six technologies (eFOCUS 1)
title_short Perceived usefulness and ease of use of fundoscopy by medical students: a randomised crossover trial of six technologies (eFOCUS 1)
title_sort perceived usefulness and ease of use of fundoscopy by medical students a randomised crossover trial of six technologies efocus 1
topic Fundoscopy
Smartphone
Education
Non mydriatic camera
Direct ophthalmoscope
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02469-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hpdunn perceivedusefulnessandeaseofuseoffundoscopybymedicalstudentsarandomisedcrossovertrialofsixtechnologiesefocus1
AT cjkang perceivedusefulnessandeaseofuseoffundoscopybymedicalstudentsarandomisedcrossovertrialofsixtechnologiesefocus1
AT smarks perceivedusefulnessandeaseofuseoffundoscopybymedicalstudentsarandomisedcrossovertrialofsixtechnologiesefocus1
AT jlwitherow perceivedusefulnessandeaseofuseoffundoscopybymedicalstudentsarandomisedcrossovertrialofsixtechnologiesefocus1
AT smdunn perceivedusefulnessandeaseofuseoffundoscopybymedicalstudentsarandomisedcrossovertrialofsixtechnologiesefocus1
AT prhealey perceivedusefulnessandeaseofuseoffundoscopybymedicalstudentsarandomisedcrossovertrialofsixtechnologiesefocus1
AT ajwhite perceivedusefulnessandeaseofuseoffundoscopybymedicalstudentsarandomisedcrossovertrialofsixtechnologiesefocus1